Consumer Law Library

Bbdo Worldwide, Inc

Volume 121 · 121 F.T.C. 33

Citation
121 F.T.C. 33
Docket
C-3637
Complaint
1996-01-24
Decision
1996-01-24
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
advertising
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; recordkeeping; compliance_reporting; notice_to_customers
Order term (years)
20
Commission counsel
Anne V. Maher
Respondent counsel
Pro se
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisinghealth claims

Cite this decision

Bbdo Worldwide, Inc, 121 F.T.C. 33 (1996). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v121-0003

Report an error in this record (decision id v121-0003)

Order status: dismissed_no_order. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF BBDO WORLDWIDE, INC.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., INREGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SECS. 5 AND 12 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-3637. Complaint, Jan. 24, 1996--Decision, Jan. 24, 1996 This consent order prohibits, among other things, a New York advertising firm from misrepresenting the amount of fat, calories, or cholesterol in any frozen yogurt, any frozen sorbet, and most ice cream products. This action stems from the firm's role in developing certain advertisements for Haagen-Dazs frozen yogurt products.

Appearances For the Commission: Anne V. Maher.

For the respondent: Pro se.

COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that BBDO Worldwide, Inc., a corporation ("respondent"), has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, alleges:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent BBDO Worldwide, Inc. is a New York corporation, with its principal office or place of business at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY. PAR. 2. Respondent, at all times relevant to this complaint, was an advertising agency of Haagen-Dazs Company, Inc., and prepared and disseminated advertisements to promote the sale of Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt, a "food" within the meaning of Sections 12 and 15 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

PAR. 3. The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. PAR. 4. Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated advertisements for Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt, Complaint 121 F.T.C.

including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibits 1-3. These advertisements contain the following statements and depictions:

A. [In a 70-point type headline:] WHY IS HAAGEN-DAZS® FROZEN YOGURT BETTER THAN YOUR FIRST TRUE LOVE? [Depiction of "Honeymooners"] HAAGEN-DAZS IS STILL 98% FAT FREE*.

[In 15-point text below the headline: ] Imagine pineapple sorbet tantalizingly wrapped around a coconut frozen yogurt bar. And now imagine that this bar has 100 calories. Or imagine a pint of vanilla frozen yogurt swirled with heavenly raspberry sorbet. And that these and all the rest of our irresistible frozen yogurt and sorbet combinations are 98% fat free. But they're still totally Haagen-Dazs.

What could be better? [Depiction of frozen yogurt carton container and box of frozen yogurt bars] [In 8-point type at the bottom right side of the page:] *frozen yogurt and sorbet combinations (Exhibit 1) B. [In a 70-point type headline:] WHY IS HAAGEN-DAZS® FROZEN YOGURT BETTER THAN YOUR FIRST TRUE LOVE? [Depiction of "Honeymooners"] HAAGEN-DAZS IS STILL 98% FAT FREE*.

[In 20-point text below the headline:] Try new Raspberry Rendezvous™ and Orange Tango™ Frozen Yogurt. Both are 98% fat free and still totally Haagen-Dazs. [Depiction of frozen yogurt carton container] [In 8-point type at the bottom right side of the page:] *frozen yogurt and sorbet combinations (Exhibit 2) C. {In a 110-point type headline:] NOW DISAPPEARING AT A STORE NEAR YOU.

{Depiction of frozen yogurt bar] {In 15-point text below the headline:] Take a good look. This is what a Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt bar looks like. We thought we'd point that out, just in case you have some trouble finding them in your store. Because it seems that people are demanding them faster than we can supply them. Not that we're really surprised. After all, we're the ones who made them so irresistible in the first place -- with flavors like Raspberry & Vanilla, Peach, Strawberry Daiquiri and Pifia Colada. And each with just 1 gram of fat and 100 calories. So now that you know what they look like -- go ahead and try one. And you'll find out for yourself just how quickly they can disappear. (Exhibit 3) BBDO WORLDWIDE, INC. 35 33 Complaint PAR. 5. Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements referred to in paragraph four, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements attached as Exhibits 1 and 2, respondent has represented, directly or by implication, that Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt is 98% fat free. PAR. 6. In truth and if fact, in most cases Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt is not 98% fat free. Seven of the nine Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt flavors sold in cartons and three of the eight Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bar flavors contained more than two percent fat content at the time of dissemination of the advertisements referred to in paragraph four. Therefore, the representation set forth in paragraph five was, and is, false and misleading. PAR. 7. Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements referred to in paragraph four, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements attached as Exhibits 1 and 2, respondent has represented, directly or by implication, that Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt is low fat. PAR. 8. In truth and if fact, in most cases Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt is not low fat. Three of the nine Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt flavors sold in cartons and three of the eight Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bar flavors contained from eight to twelve grams of fat per serving at the time of dissemination of the advertisements referred to in paragraph four. In addition, four of the nine Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt flavors sold in cartons contained from four to six grams of fat per serving. Therefore, the representation set forth in paragraph seven was, and is, false and misleading. PAR. 9. Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements referred to in paragraph four, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisement attached as Exhibit 3, respondent has represented, directly or by implication, that Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bars contain one gram of fat per serving.

PAR. 10. In truth and in fact, in many cases Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bars contain more than one gram of fat per serving. Three of the eight Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bar flavors contained from eleven to twelve grams of fat per serving at the time of dissemination of the advertisements referred to in paragraph four. Therefore, the representation set forth in paragraph nine was, and is, false and misleading.

Complaint 121 F.T.C.

PAR. 11. Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements referred to in paragraph four, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisement attached as Exhibit 3, respondent has represented, directly or by implication, that Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bars are low fat. PAR. 12. In truth and in fact, in many cases Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bars are not low fat. Three of the eight Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bar flavors contained from eleven to twelve grams of fat per serving at the time of dissemination of the advertisements referred to in paragraph four. Therefore, the representation set forth in paragraph eleven was, and is, false and misleading. PAR. 13. Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements referred to in paragraph four, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisement attached as Exhibit 3, respondent has represented, directly or by implication, that Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bars contain 100 calories per serving. PAR. 14. In truth and in fact, in many cases Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bars contain more than 100 calories per serving. Three of the eight Haagen-Dazs Frozen Yogurt Bar flavors contained from 210 to 230 calories per serving at the time of dissemination of the advertisements referred to in paragraph four. Therefore, the representation set forth in paragraph thirteen was, and is, false and misleading.

PAR. 15. Respondent knew or should have known that the representations set forth in paragraphs five, seven, nine, eleven and thirteen were, and are, false and misleading. PAR. 16. The acts and practices of the respondent as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices and the making of false advertisements in or affecting commerce in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. BBDO WORLDWIDE, INC. 37 33 Complaint EXHIBIT 1 Imagine pineapple sorbet tantalizingly wrapped around a coconut frozen yogurt bar. And now imagine that this bar has 100 calories. Or imagine a pint of vanilla frozen yogurt swirled with heavenly raspberry sorbet. And that these and all the rest of our irresistible , frozen yogurt and sorbet combinations are 98% fat free. But they're still totally Haagen-Dazs. What could be better? HAAGEN-DAZS. IT’S BETTER THAN ANYTHING.

“frozen yogurt and sorbet combinations Complaint 121 F.T.C.

EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 2 naan eaaeaa a 4 Try new Raspberry Rendezvous’ and Orange SAVE $1.00 Tango" Frozen Yogurt. Both ON ANY FLA WAAGEN-DATY FROZEN FOGURT PINTS are 98% fat free and still 18023 totally Haagen-Dazs.

rpmeencence stocet Fat aatecrgann gq maagen Qars ice Cream Shoes ‘ . ‘ra7en wonut ard serbet comtinanons BBDO WORLDWIDE, INC. 39 33 Complaint EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 3 (reduced-size from 15"x25"

original) “ane a ZO0C OOK “MS 5 what a HaagenDars® Frozen Yogurt Sat Ocks he she HOUgN we ¢ DOING Tat Cul, US! 1 Case vou Mave some "oul! “Teg Mem NCU SOT Becarse | seems trat Dend e are TEemancing ‘Mem ‘asia’ (M3% we CBM SUDDIy ‘Ren Not that we fe ‘edt. Surce erg 2 ores aro Mace Me™ SO “esl OW IM! he Sl ace mA cry ecw aM Peg Tr add ANC Cath wD US! 1 Braet s “ey 00* se ~ 20 ynenc anc vy ore Ast. CSE" LS! Tow SUC y Mey fan s-suo0eer WAAGEN+DAZS. IT'S RETTER THAN ANYTHING, Decision and Order 121 F.T.C.

DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Bureau of Consumer Protection proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and The respondent, its attorneys, and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, or that the facts as alleged in such complaint, other than jurisdictional facts, are true and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission's Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondent has violated the said Act, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of a sixty (60) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34 of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings and enters the following order: 1. Respondent BBDO Worldwide, Inc. is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, with its office and principal place of business located at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, in the City of New York, State of New York.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

BBDO WORLDWIDE, INC. 41 33 Decision and Order ORDER It is ordered, That respondent BBDO Worldwide, Inc., a corporation, its successors and assigns, and its officers, agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with the manufacturing, labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any frozen yogurt, frozen sorbet or ice cream product (excluding all other food or confection products in which ice cream is an ingredient comprising less than fifty percent of the total weight of the involved product) in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from misrepresenting, in any manner, directly or by implication, through numerical or descriptive terms or any other means, the existence or amount of fat, saturated fat, cholesterol or calories in any such product. If any representation covered by this Part either directly or by implication conveys any nutrient content claim defined (for purposes of labeling) by any regulation promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration, compliance with this Part shall be governed by the qualifying amount for such defined claim as set forth in that regulation. II.

Nothing in this order shall prohibit respondent from making any representation that is specifically permitted in labeling for any frozen yogurt, frozen sorbet or ice cream by regulations promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration pursuant to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990.

Hil.

It is further ordered, That for three (3) years after the last date of dissemination of any representation covered by this order, respondent, or its successors and assigns, shall maintain and upon request make available to the Federal Trade Commission for inspection and copying:

Decision and Order 121 F.T.C.

1. All materials that were relied upon in disseminating such representation; and 2. All tests, reports, studies, surveys, demonstrations, or other evidence in its possession or control that contradict, qualify, or call into question such representation, or the basis relied upon for such representation, including complaints from consumers. IV.

It is further ordered, That respondent shall notify the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in the respondent such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries, or any other change in the respondent which may affect compliance obligations arising out of this order. V.

It is further ordered, That respondent shall, within thirty (30) days after service of this order, distribute a copy of this order to each of its operating divisions and to each of its officers, agents, representatives, or employees engaged in the preparation or placement of advertisements or other materials covered by this order. VI.

This order will terminate on January 24, 2016, or twenty years from the most recent date that the United States or the Federal Trade Commission files a complaint (with or without an accompanying consent decree) in federal court alleging any violation of the order, whichever comes later; provided, however, that the filing of such a complaint will not affect the duration of: A. Any paragraph in this order that terminates in less than twenty years; .

B. This order's application to any respondent that is not named as a defendant in such complaint; and C. This order if such complaint is filed after the order has terminated pursuant to this paragraph.

BBDO WORLDWIDE, INC. 43 33 Decision and Order Provided further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the respondent did not violate any provision of the order, and the dismissal or ruling is either not appealed or upheld on appeal, then the order will terminate according to this paragraph as though the complaint was never filed, except that the order will not terminate between the date such complaint is filed and the later of the deadline for appealing such dismissal or ruling and the date such dismissal or ruling is upheld on appeal.

VIL.

It is further ordered, That respondent shall, within sixty (60) days after service of this order, and at such other times as the Commission may require, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order.

Complaint 121 F.T.C.

← 121 F.T.C. 22 · 121 F.T.C. 44 →