Hackensack Meridian Health, Inc.
Volume 173 · 173 F.T.C. 996
Cite this decision
Hackensack Meridian Health, Inc., 173 F.T.C. 996 (2022). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v173-0029
Report an error in this record (decision id v173-0029)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH, INC., AND ENGLEWOOD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION Docket No. 9399. Order, April 7, 2022 Order setting deadline for Respondents to file any answer(s) to the Motion for Continuance to enable the Commission to issue a timely ruling on the Motion.
ORDER SETTING EXPEDITED RESPONSE DEADLINE On August 4, 2021, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted Complaint Counsel’s motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the proposed merger between Respondents Hackensack Meridian Health, Inc. and Englewood Healthcare Foundation until completion of this administrative proceeding. FTC v. Hackensack Meridian Health, Inc., No. 20- 18140, 2021 WL 4145062 (D.N.J. Aug. 4, 2021). The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s injunction on March 22, 2022. FTC v. Hackensack Meridian Health, Inc., No. 21- 2603, 2022 WL 840463 (3d Cir. Mar. 22, 2022). On March 31, 2022, Respondents notified Complaint Counsel that they were abandoning their transaction. On April 5, 2022, Respondents mutually terminated their merger agreement and withdrew their Hart-Scott-Rodino Notification and Report Forms.
That same day, Complaint Counsel and Respondents filed competing motions regarding appropriate next steps in this proceeding. Complaint Counsel moved to withdraw the matter from adjudication so that the Commission could evaluate whether further relief is warranted. Respondents moved to dismiss the Complaint on the basis that the administrative action is now moot and no further adjudicative proceedings are necessary, appropriate, or in the public interest. Additionally, Complaint Counsel filed an expedited motion for a 60-day continuance of the administrative proceeding, in which the evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin on April 22, 2022, to avoid the potentially unnecessary, significant expense to litigating and third parties of preparing for the hearing and complying with imminent prehearing deadlines while the Commission considers the other two motions (“Motion for Continuance”). According to Complaint Counsel, Respondents declined to join the motion for continuance because Respondents believe that this matter is moot and that dismissal is the only appropriate next step. Under Commission Rules 3.22(d) and 4.4(c), 16 C.F.R, §§ 3.22(d) & 4.4(c), Respondents' answer to the Motion for Continuance is due on April 18, 2022, "or such longer or shorter time as may be designated by the ... Commission." Delaying Commission action until after April 18 would subject the parties and third parties to the burdens and expense of complying with prehearing deadlines in the interim, including the submission of motions for in camera treatment and pretrial briefs. See Order Granting Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (Nov. 16, 2021). To enable the Commission to issue a timely ruling on the Motion for Continuance, we will order Respondents to file any answer(s) to the Motion for Continuance no later than 1:00 pm E.D.T. on April 8, 2022. HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH, INC. 997 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondents must file any answer(s) to Complaint Counsel's Expedited Motion for a 60-Day Continuance of Administrative Proceedings, filed on April 5, 2022, no later than 1:00 pm E.D.T. on April 8, 2022. By the Commission.
VOLUME 173 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.