Consumer Law Library

Traffic Jam Events, LLC.

Volume 172 · 172 F.T.C. 285

Citation
172 F.T.C. 285
Docket
9395
Decision
2021-08-24
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
consumer protection
Outcome
other
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Traffic Jam Events, LLC., 172 F.T.C. 285 (2021). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v172-0012

Report an error in this record (decision id v172-0012)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF TRAFFIC JAM EVENTS, LLC.

AND DAVID J. JEANSONNE II Docket No. 9395. Order, August 24, 2021 Order directing Respondents to provide expedited response to Complaint Counsel’s expedited motion to continue evidentiary hearing and prehearing deadlines.

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO PROVIDE EXPEDITED RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S EXPEDITED MOTION TO CONTINUE EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND PREHEARING DEADLINES On August 18, 2021, Complaint Counsel moved for a continuance of the date of the evidentiary hearing from September 14, 2021, to November 16, 2021, and corresponding adjustment of the deadlines for prehearing submissions, because the hearing and prehearing proceedings may be rendered moot be the Commission’s resolution of Complaint Counsel’s pending Motion for Summary Decision. Complaint Counsel’s Expedited Motion to Continue Evidentiary Hearing and Prehearing Deadlines (“Motion for Continuance”). Complaint Counsel requested expedited treatment of the Motion for Continuance because of the approaching hearing date and deadlines for pretrial submissions, beginning on August 30, 2021. Complaint Counsel stated, however, that Respondents’ counsel has not assented to continuing the hearing and indicated that Respondents may seek other relief. Under Commission Rules 3.22(d) and 4.3(c), Respondents normally would have ten days to respond to the Motion for Continuance, plus an additional day reflecting electronic service. Rule 3.22(d), however, authorizes the Commission to adjust the response period. To facilitate prompt resolution of the Motion for Continuance in the face of imminent prehearing deadline, we direct Respondents to provide an expedited response to Complaint Counsel’s expedited Motion for Continuance. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondents Traffic Jam Events, LLC. and David J. Jeansonne II shall submit their response (if any) to Complaint Counsel’s Expedited Motion to Continue Evidentiary Hearing and Prehearing Deadlines by no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon), August 25, 2021.

By the Commission.

VOLUME 172 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.

← 172 F.T.C. 284 · 172 F.T.C. 286 →