Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Epichouse, LLC

Volume 171 · 171 F.T.C. 316

Citation
171 F.T.C. 316
Docket
C-4736
Complaint
2021-02-02
Decision
2021-02-02
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
Cannabidiol products
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; redress; notice_to_customers; recordkeeping; compliance_reporting
Money (USD)
30000
Order term (years)
20
Separate statement / dissent
yes
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisinghealth claimsonline internet

Cite this decision

Epichouse, LLC, 171 F.T.C. 316 (2021). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v171-0009

Report an error in this record (decision id v171-0009)

Order status: active_until:2041-02-02. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF EPICHOUSE, LLC D/B/A FIRST CLASS HERBALIST CBD, COBALT SERUM, COBALT ENHANCE, AND COBALT CREAM, AND JOHN LE CONSENT ORDER, ETC. IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 5 AND 12 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket No. C-4736; File No. 202 3094 Complaint, February 2, 2021 – Decision, February 2, 2021 This consent order addresses Epichouse, LLC’s advertising for products containing cannabidiol, including First Class Herbalist CBD oil. The complaint alleges that Respondents violated Sections 5(a) and 12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act by disseminating false and unsubstantiated advertisements claiming that their CBD Products, among other things: are safe for all users; treat pain better than prescription medicine like OxyContin; prevent and treat numerous serious health conditions, including age-related cognitive decline, cancer, chronic pain, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and migraines; and are scientifically proven to improve many serious health conditions. The consent order prohibits Respondents from making any representation about the efficacy of any covered product, unless the representation is non-misleading, including that, at the time such representation is made, they possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates that the representation is true. Participants For the Commission: Keith Fentonmiller and Brady Williams. For the Respondents: Karl Kronenberger, Kronenberger Rosenfeld, LLP. COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Epichouse, LLC, a corporation, also doing business as First Class Herbalist CBD, Cobalt Serum, Cobalt Enhance, and Cobalt Cream, and John Le, individually and as an owner and officer of Epichouse, LLC (collectively, “Respondents”), have violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges: 1. Respondent Epichouse, LLC (“Epichouse”), also doing business as First Class Herbalist CBD, Cobalt Serum, Cobalt Enhance, and Cobalt Cream, is a Utah corporation with its principal place of business at 3370 Brock St., West Valley City, Utah 84119-2902. EPICHOUSE, LLC 317 Complaint 2. Respondent John Le is the sole owner and officer of Epichouse. Individually or in concert with others, he controlled or had the authority to control, or participated in the acts and practices alleged in this complaint. He resides in Midvale, Utah. 3. The acts and practices of Respondents alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as “commerce” as defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Respondents’ Marketing of CBD Products 4. Cannabidiol (“CBD”) is a substance naturally occurring in, and that can be extracted from, the hemp plant, cannabis sativa. Respondents advertised, promoted, offered for sale, sold, and distributed products containing CBD (“CBD Products”) that are intended for human use. These CBD Products are “food” and/or “drugs,” within the meaning of Sections 12 and 15 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

5. Through the website firstclassherbalistcbd.com, Respondents sold CBD Products in the form of oils, coffee, and edible “gummies,” and as a topical cream. Respondents sold their CBD Products to consumers throughout the United States under some or all of the following names: “CBD Oil;” “CBD Hemp Oil Drops;” “Herbalist Oils CBD Hemp Oil Drops;” “Pure Herbal CBD Hemp Oil Drops;” “CBD Coffee;” “CBD Gummies;” “Pure Herbal CBD Gummies;” “Full Spectrum CBD;” “CBD Pain Rub;” “Herbalist Oils CBD Pain Rub;” “CBD + Turmeric Drops;” “Pure Isolate CBD;” and “100% Pure CBD Oil.” Respondents charged consumers $39.99 to $79.95 for their CBD Products.

6. From approximately September 2019 through April 2020, Respondents disseminated or caused to be disseminated advertisements for CBD Products, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibits A through E. Respondents promoted CBD Products through a variety of means, including through their website firstclassherbalistcbd.com. These advertisements contained the following statements and depictions: a. CBD Oil:

VOLUME 171 Complaint # # # # # # THE SCIENCE OF CBD (CANNABIDOIL) [sic] …CBD Oil has been medically proven to positively regulate your ECS [endocannabinoid system] affecting issues such as anxiety, insomnia, chronic pain, hypertension and even cardiovascular issues. … Psychological Benefits: CBD is commonly used to address anxiety, and for patients who suffer through the misery of insomnia, studies suggest that CBD may help with both falling asleep and staying asleep…. [Exhibit A (www.firstclassherbalistcbd.com, identified by Respondents as EPIC00674)].

b. CBD + Turmeric Oil:

EPICHOUSE, LLC 319 Complaint # # # # # # THE SCIENCE OF CBD (CANNABIDOIL) [sic] CBD Oil has been shown to positively regulate your ECS addressing issues such as anxiety, insomnia, chronic pain, and inflammation. Here is what the ECS system is known to do:

• Body: Stimulates an anti-inflammatory response which helps reduce all forms of chronic aches and pains. . . .

• Brain: Helps positively regulate mood patterns which help reduce anxiety and stress. It also promotes better sleep cycles and in some cases may offer a safe remedy for depression and bipolar disorders. • Age: Inflammation is a natural killer responsible for all sorts of disease such as diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and more. . . . [Exhibit B (www.firstclassherbalistcbd.com, identified by Respondents as EPIC00682)].

c. CBD Coffee Products:

VOLUME 171 Complaint # # # CBD Oil Coffee works WITH your body to ELIMINATE YOUR PAIN FROM WITHIN. And it goes to work quickly. After over 20,000 clinical studies, it has been proven over and over again… arthritis pain… eliminated…. # # # # # # THE SCIENCE OF CBD (CANNABIDOIL) [sic] … CBD Oil has been medically proven to positively regulate your ECS addressing issues such as anxiety, insomnia, chronic pain, hypertension, and even cardiovascular issues.

EPICHOUSE, LLC 321 Complaint • Physical Benefits: Stimulates an anti-inflammatory response which helps reduce all forms of chronic aches and pains. . . . • Psychological Benefits: Helps positively regulate mood patterns which help reduce anxiety and stress. It also promotes better sleep cycles and in some cases may offer a safe remedy for depression and bipolar disorders.

• Neurological Benefits: Our CBD Oil’s positive impact on the neural system helps reduce age-related cognitive decline. It also helps support focus, alertness & memory recall while reducing the frequency of migraines and headaches.

# # # [Exhibit C (www.firstclassherbalistcbd.com, identified by Respondents as EPIC00662)].

d. CBD Pain Rub Products:

…Another study also indicated that when used topically, CBD could lower pain and inflammation due to arthritis. . . .

# # # THE SCIENCE OF CBD (CANNABIDOIL) [sic] VOLUME 171 Complaint … CBD Rub has been shown to positively regulate your ECS addressing issues such as anxiety, insomnia, chronic pain, and inflammation. Here is what the ECS system is known to do:

• Body: Stimulates an anti-inflammatory response which helps reduce all forms of chronic aches and pains. . . .

• Brain: Helps positively regulate mood patters which help reduce anxiety and stress. It also promotes better sleep cycles and in some cases may offer a safe remedy for depression and bipolar disorders. • Age: Inflammation is a natural killer responsible for all sorts of disease such as diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and more…. [Exhibit D (www.firstclassherbalistcbd.com, identified by Respondents as EPIC00680)].

e. CBD Gummy Products:

# # # THE SCIENCE OF CBD (CANNABIDOIL) [sic] CBD Oil has been shown to positively regulate your ECS addressing issues such as anxiety, insomnia, chronic pain and inflammation. Here is what the ECS system is known to do:

• Body: Stimulates an anti-inflammatory response which helps reduce all forms of chronic aches and pains. . . .

EPICHOUSE, LLC 323 Complaint • Brain: Helps positively regulate mood patters which help reduce anxiety and stress. It also promotes better sleep cycles and in some cases may offer a safe remedy for depression and bipolar disorders. • Age: Inflammation is a natural killer responsible for all sorts of disease such as diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and more…. [Exhibit E (www.firstclassherbalistcbd.com, identified by Respondents as EPIC00667)].

7. Respondents have not conducted any studies demonstrating that their CBD Products cure, treat, alleviate, or prevent diseases or health conditions. There are no competent and reliable human clinical studies in the scientific literature to substantiate that these products or their ingredients cure, treat, alleviate, or prevent the diseases or health conditions mentioned in the advertising excerpts set forth in Paragraph 6.

Count I False or Unsubstantiated Efficacy Claims 8. In connection with the advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of CBD Products, including through the means described in Paragraph 6 of this Complaint, Respondents have represented, directly or indirectly, expressly or by implication, that CBD Products:

a. treat, alleviate, or cure age-related cognitive decline; chronic pain, including neuropathic pain, pain from spinal cord injuries, and pain from diseases like arthritis; adult acne; Alzheimer’s disease; arthritis; autoimmune disorder; bipolar disorder; cancer; colitis; Crohn’s disease; depression; diabetes; endocrine disorders; heart disease; high blood pressure; migraines; multiple sclerosis; neurodegeneration; obesity; Parkinson’s disease; prostate problems; psoriasis; rheumatism; schizophrenia; and stroke;

b. prevent age-related cognitive decline, cancer, chronic pain, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and migraines;

c. can replace the need for prescription painkillers like oxycontin; and d. are safe for all consumers.

9. The representations set forth in Paragraph 8 are false or misleading, or were not substantiated at the time the representations were made. VOLUME 171 Complaint Count II False Establishment Claims 10. In connection with the advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of CBD Products, including through the means described in Paragraph 6 of this Complaint, Respondents have represented, directly or indirectly, expressly or by implication, that studies or scientific research prove that CBD Products:

a. improve alertness, focus, and memory recall;

b. treat, alleviate, or cure age-related cognitive decline; anxiety; bipolar disorder; cancer; chronic pain, including arthritis pain; depression; diabetes; heart disease; high blood pressure; inflammation; insomnia; and migraines; and c. prevent age-related cognitive decline; anxiety; chronic pain, including arthritis pain; cancer; diabetes; heart disease; hypertension; inflammation; insomnia; and migraines.

11. In fact, studies or scientific research do not prove that their CBD Products: a. improve alertness, focus, and memory recall;

b. treat, alleviate, or cure age-related cognitive decline; anxiety; bipolar disorder; cancer; chronic pain, including arthritis pain; depression; diabetes; heart disease; high blood pressure; inflammation; insomnia; and migraines; and c. prevent age-related cognitive decline; anxiety; chronic pain, including arthritis pain; cancer; diabetes; heart disease; hypertension; inflammation; insomnia; and migraines.

Therefore, the representations set forth in Paragraph 10 are false or misleading. Violations of Section 5 and 12 12. The acts and practices of Respondents as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices, and the making of false advertisements, in or affecting commerce in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. THEREFORE, the Federal Trade Commission this second day of February, 2021, has issued this Complaint against Respondents.

By the Commission.

EPICHOUSE, LLC 325 Complaint Exhibit A Vermin Due to ecreenaty hgh manda carrer there ip iretes epety of Martie Cth CIID im etoce as ct ere 3, S000) Sate. clive, 3 and Fret Name” (ant Nene’ 1002 Legal! © For Pain & Chronic Aches WHY IS FULL SPECTRUM CBD CEC) OF were WT sour bocly t ACORERS Pally FROM MUSTER Ared 4 yows to work quickly. Ate cow 20,006 clirine ches, Ffak See) power over ancl Oe ape _ The earriatinedte fresred 91 CO Mert 08 Droge aoe the SAME Gorpourtdte that reyutele tecod afal jako 24 fhe brat aevdd boty. paw! Gaye he carted stock: 2 CEO heerp Of Droge reteracts eett Spake [he network, of weeghors fant teaghar wetetiny par beset, dnyaee Yard) mre hare portent teeny pour bee ant Sentry peas younger FTC Cmplt. Exh. A-1 VOLUME 171 Complaint EPICHOUSE, LLC 327 Complaint THE SCIEN The siciccerrepeed epee (Oo) 1 un re te eatrg wearing. ffeernaten ret ere mm rected, te DCE be regeervatets ter re: o ret, COC Cot hes heaesppetaaly pree= t oomet wrens Bat a8 avery, Nee (ee ewe mae Ptereman thenetita; CIO muy ere etrONe pair. A eLaty ten tha Ee Marpraten due ts ae.

ty error CMD aTkua types of We're so confident that CBD Oil will work for you, that we are going to take on 100% of the risk and protect your purchase by ving you a full 2 months to try CBD Ol! out without risking a dime WEBSITE SECURE Scouse 156-251 SL tneryptaw * 5 “The eatererte race on cur watites hve not Sees exstostad by tw FIA dS Food & Drug Ad menatumas| Cus prodects ate oot erencted oo agrees cane or prwewt wry dimen tn. The mforwuation raw bey thie wwetnaite ar think cannery ls mat ow aubattute for 6 toe-to-toe conmunenion with your pipRicien. ant whould met be Oaatrued an inch! medica sowie. The imathmordats cry PRs webwite ore incivichae Comme fevd do wet guarentee that pce wil pot the veeve rwedta Due to ihe nature of tds protect and w protect he privacy of the nchwituahe, setust amen and photcgmions of fhe incfviduals derected in the joehmonais have been changed haivicharn ar remunemtect. 2 ee ee A are eee Serre rd Commun | fermacy Muley | Contact un | Mearurancy FTC Cmplt. Exh. A-3 VOLUME 171 Complaint Exhibit B EPICHOUSE, LLC 329 Complaint hoy 10 US. CBD OIL TO GET RESULTS + Of COD -- Past MOLE + YOUN MEAITH Fem the minte you tive you frat eropot = Your renufis wit OBO + Tumeric rane af = Win CBD) + TURMERIC, you ciwarys get (CRD + Turmeric - cawabinoite wil Seed lenge with contireeduse CED 6 900% = the preper done in your body, so pou least your pytiem - acting as raturel neue non-fat toening. & can be taken daly, (Qo00d af Gay long. Enjoy he powertui rather Krarmeriners to help relieve pain, reine has NO paychosctive popertion Pls, yor end additena berate of CHD with comet, romans good sheep, and promane satisfaction is 100% gueramnesc, superior absorption! comple body balance, THE SCIENCE OF FTC Cmplt. Exh. B-2 VOLUME 171 Complaint EPICHOUSE, LLC 331 Complaint Exhibit C Wearrarg Tse 19 sateerwniy high recta derranct them i lemmed supety of CHD Cote in stock ae of ser) ATA] MURR OF On STEP 1 - TELLUS o CBD Coffee! ="

POWERFUL NATURAL PAIN RELIEF = = “The Safest. Non-Addictive and Most Effective CBD Catfee is NOW Available to the Putlic!” = » improve Focus & Memory, Seloct Coveery «| Selprt Bian ~ Matural Energy Boast! inate * Does mat Show on Drug Test | te Coa ecco omy SGT Gstcunt ey Borns WHY IS FULL SPECTRUM CBD CUD Od Cutten weaves WETH yorer boxty te CLIMATE TIM UTNE Ang 4 goer a> work cuechly, Alter ov ctinécat alates, hee been peaeen co 19. fone (tet Ths errata Ove CED 1 v0 Name bitonchy event Hr rine ey wang PX FTC Cmplt. Exh. C-1 VOLUME 171 Complaint EPICHOUSE, LLC Complaint TRANSFORMING THOUSANDS OF LIVES 1 CUP AT A TIME...

arm hae 8 ght SBE Sten tee we et ae | hee 9 em} es ee ee pe ae ene pal Ae re Ne t Nareed Get Sy ew tah, Ae we anwerOr fr F vttee CE) Latin as ANE OA NNN MY A) Ae om A (Hamre rere one Dt of eoete wom Sh F cree te SOCK wr CD Carton a SON) Nv Fw OG Te RO OF OK Tak TR my MPR ee ee +z a ee arg in mame tery ape [aye sam NDNTORE em om a re [Se CA Cote ke ny MRA CEES HO Wee RRO Be, OT ee PK a Gee ed ok me Fy ba me > om Nr a RD mm ry ot i Medien iniciecensl beheeadines he tesnieenlatieLaaiehiel leceedhioechsial teal ~~.

Lee (et DS Cate, | hy te re al Sen errs 9 A al Pe ft te Ae ms RR pm ae ae ee Ae Be eS eS oS ay at YOR Coe Naf RN Pe ro, eA ey me et my ITE Met Free ct ew ge pe te ee ae ere ee re reney mete pe rem ey em lead Renae CR Comes TR RAT aN NAF ENTER PR ame Pm GHG”

ee ee ee em es res ey pa tae ae Cee rt nena me se aw eo et Se Oe TE P| IT Ne PY HR UR a oy A ete eee Sed me eon a ee et ree THE MOST POWERFUL CBD CBD COFFEE (S CHANGING LIVES...

2e-nm Que rs foo WEBSITE SECURE ern Pk at Te hme so eee os So fee ee.

== Te eet eee ot ae eters Seek ee roemamethg ie FTAALLE Fret 8 Sry Atte, Or ptt wy et ed el eeietaneeieemickntonmidoctannaiabionaeiaebitatenl CR er ne re re ee er ee en a ee ee Ce rr en ee ree in ee FTC Cmplt. Exh. C-3 VOLUME 171 Complaint Exhibit D EPICHOUSE, LLC 335 Complaint Hou 7o USE BD OIL TO GET RESULTS &@ Step 3 Entry Apply Cresm AL, FAST MELEE TRARSPOHM TOUR HEALTH From the renute you apely CED Pain Pu = Wor nenlts wih CBD Pain fb wit (in Horteatet Cte! Ful Specoun CBD cannabinoids wil food your nysten ~ improve wth continued use. GBD 100% 0 aim Mud, you aban get the proper dose ching 48 (ues seurn barserdters Rorhabdl forking. MN can be baba daty, if) your Dodk, #0 pou feel Quod af day baie satave pair, rufeve arsiety, promote = fhas NO paychoactee oroperten. Mum Jong. Emery the powerful rebet and ood sheep, nS promote Conptete bork you setiviecton & YOR queutteect. eddtonal Denes of CED wih sepercr balance abaoptan! THE SCIENCE OF FTC Cmplt. Exh. D-2 VOLUME 171 Complaint EPICHOUSE, LLC Complaint Exhibit E Get CBD The Easy Way...

CBD GUMMIES! POWERFUL & NATURAL Safe, Non-Habit Forming. Effective and Made with Pure CBD! © Powerful Reet Without The High! asccvee Heyy Needs WHERE TO SEND YOUR JAR deed ae ome STEP 1- TELLUS Yd rel Maen” | Law Marte Couey ret mee ‘Saiect Country = + Select Sas tees Cum Tp Cot 1 ~~ Phone Nuendse* Err Ad crenns* WHY IS CBD CD Oh withe WITH your bedy tm ANGHESS YOUN BYSTE UE Fn On FIITMAN, WIN the Tether #! tan oe CSD Pied, more art more ctracat Sues rou berg oeterim! every tty earrrebirmpite based ir Pur therteal C09 Oh texte coertoard fe Coiceamtty tenihg sturdier for bt us etapa), 6 ate weebsly being cliserved for 4s etter are bei Cemned #4 kn neon tar clrorke pain Ane Wraicatedd that car be used tremely. i pee! chaps, 1 Merton! O80 Gurveveae rruny fmevetit your artre eet Ihe teteork of peceptors houtd tthreughent your bedy, net. rit, oyses, garcs) FTC Cmplt. Exh. E-1 VOLUME 171 Complaint Gates 2+ We = Pchaumt 3 lars of COD Gaurrses EPICHOUSE, LLC Complaint TRANSFORMING THOUSANDS OF LIVES 1 BITE AT A TIME...

Onn, (Great protect! (inh they sok! @ by the bucket, it br tw ony thing chat netewes tte sciatic pain! have, as Od a6 he pain in my lower Sack, Dovered on Lane as arpectod. & Angela Ihave reardered (think ities probably the best naln seGef | Nave tried § matte ) Serko U 108 (ie Coen fer rtny Arve, Ferner! aeyiing Getter. (ewe everything aboot it! revl be patting as tor he row of ny We) bope As a long ene J if, My Grover caves eGeut thes 6 / wre 0 aay £2 2 pood @ecovery, (have nestle Aner pen after nee replecoment & ¢ actualy does hel relieve the paler 1 Cobre AB geod ox gece The relel ix there, My beck ines and hands are moving much more fuktly mom ym & Whersen anne the pain | Uteraily sal in oem, Works Great 17 Awe D.

love this for pain! Takes enay the pay bemediatety if goer to werk right avay and you cont need very feuck! Tle eras Irae oy fone mareited ont baer We're so confident that Pure Herbal CBD Gumunies will work for you, that we are going to take on 100% of the risk and protect your purchase c by giving you a full 2 months to try it out without risking a dime, WEBSITE SECURE we 286 bot SSA Enarpgtiow 08 ese.

FO rewire my phe mari ant mtbr ng wy rtormetem te contewen oe tfy Tt Py RUMEN A COMHET HN AOERGES Yd ROTA NE TeRTNG CO HERS ERE oF (tne Met aa ma aan eed enna ye aad Saas wm asp Nas} apy Rey | ho ine, ‘+The statenente trade on cos webs nes have mat hoon wralapind bry the FDA 11 8 Fond & Drug Adreveswation) Cu predeats are rat intersted te dagrais, cre Sl ante ees Fn the eet eis total Soha mnie ste eee bee fen e Enne Bs Rowe wea i metals me FTC Cmplt. Exh. E-3 VOLUME 171 Decision and Order DECISION The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the Respondents named in the caption. The Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection (“BCP”) prepared and furnished to Respondents a draft Complaint. BCP proposed to present the draft Complaint to the Commission for its consideration. If issued by the Commission, the draft Complaint would charge the Respondents with violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Respondents and BCP thereafter executed an Agreement Containing Consent Order (“Consent Agreement”). The Consent Agreement includes: 1) statements by Respondents that they neither admit nor deny any of the allegations in the Complaint, except as specifically stated in this Decision and Order, and that only for purposes of this action, they admit the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction; and 2) waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission’s Rules.

The Commission considered the matter and determined that it had reason to believe that Respondents have violated the Federal Trade Commission Act, and that a Complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect. The Commission accepted the executed Consent Agreement and placed it on the public record for a period of 30 days for the receipt and consideration of public comments. The Commission duly considered any comments received from interested persons pursuant to Section 2.34 of its Rules, 16 C.F.R. § 2.34. Now, in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Rule 2.34, the Commission issues its Complaint, makes the following Findings, and issues the following Order: Findings 1. The Respondents are:

a. Respondent Epichouse, LLC (“Epichouse”), also doing business as First Class Herbalist CBD, Cobalt Serum, Cobalt Enhance, and Cobalt Cream, a Utah corporation with its principal office or place of business at 3370 Brock St., West Valley City, Utah 84119-2902.

b. Respondent John Le, the sole owner and officer of Epichouse. Individually or in concert with others, he controlled or had the authority to control, or participated in the acts and practices alleged in this complaint. He resides in Midvale, Utah.

2. The Commission has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and over the Respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest. EPICHOUSE, LLC 341 Decision and Order ORDER DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Order, the following definitions apply: A. “CBD Product” means any Dietary Supplement, Food, or Drug containing cannabidiol.

B. “Covered Product(s)” means any Dietary Supplement, Food, or Drug, including but not limited to CBD Products sold or marketed by Respondents. C. “Dietary Supplement” means (1) any product labeled as a dietary supplement or otherwise represented as a dietary supplement; or (2) any pill, tablet, capsule, powder, softgel, gelcap, liquid, or other similar form containing one or more ingredients that are a vitamin, mineral, herb or other botanical, amino acid, probiotic, or other dietary substance for use by humans to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake, or a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract, or combination of any ingredient described above, that is intended to be ingested, and is not represented to be used as a conventional Food or as a sole item of a meal or the diet.

D. “Drug” means (1) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopoeia, official Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; (2) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in humans or other animals; (3) articles (other than Food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of humans or other animals; and (4) articles intended for use as a component of any article specified in (1), (2), or (3); but does not include devices or their components, parts, or accessories. E. “Essentially Equivalent Product” means a product that contains the identical ingredients, except for inactive ingredients (e.g., binders, colors, fillers, excipients) in the same form and dosage, and with the same route of administration (e.g., orally, sublingually), as the Covered Product; provided that the Covered Product may contain additional ingredients if reliable scientific evidence generally accepted by experts in the field indicates that the amount and combination of additional ingredients is unlikely to impede or inhibit the effectiveness of the ingredients in the Essentially Equivalent Product. F. “Food” means (1) any article used for food or drink for humans or other animals; (2) chewing gum; and (3) any article used for components of any such article. G. “Respondent” means the Individual Respondent and the Corporate Respondent, individually, collectively, or in any combination.

VOLUME 171 Decision and Order 1. “Corporate Respondent” means Epichouse, LLC, a limited liability company, also doing business as First Class Herbalist CBD, Cobalt Serum, Cobalt Enhance, and Cobalt Cream, and its successors and assigns. 2. “Individual Respondent” means John Le.

PROVISIONS I. PROHIBITED REPRESENTATIONS: HEALTH-RELATED CLAIMS REQUIRING HUMAN CLINICAL TESTING FOR SUBSTANTIATION IT IS ORDERED that Respondents, Respondents’ officers, agents, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with the manufacturing, labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any Covered Product, must not make, or assist others in making, expressly or by implication, any representation that such product:

A. treats, alleviates, or cures age-related cognitive decline, neurodegeneration, or prostate problems;

B. prevents age-related cognitive decline, pain, hypertension, or migraines; C. treats, alleviates, or cures any disease, including but not limited to adult acne; Alzheimer’s disease; arthritis, autoimmune disorder; bipolar disorder; cancer; pain, including neuropathic pain, pain from spinal cord injuries, and pain from diseases like arthritis; colitis; Crohn’s disease; depression; diabetes; endocrine disorders; heart disease; high blood pressure; migraines; multiple sclerosis; obesity; Parkinson’s disease; psoriasis; rheumatism; strokes; or schizophrenia; D. replaces the need for prescription painkillers like oxycontin; or E. is safe for all consumers;

unless the representation is non-misleading, and, at the time of making such representation, Respondents, Respondents’ officers, agents, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence substantiating that the representation is true. For purposes of this Section, competent and reliable scientific evidence must consist of human clinical testing of the Covered Product or of an Essentially Equivalent Product, that is sufficient in quality and quantity based on standards generally accepted by experts in the relevant disease, condition, or function to which the representation relates, when considered in light of the entire body of relevant and reliable scientific evidence, to substantiate that the representation is true. Such testing must be: (1) randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled; and (2) conducted by researchers qualified by training and experience to conduct such testing. In addition, all underlying or supporting data and documents generally accepted by experts in the field as relevant to an assessment of such EPICHOUSE, LLC 343 Decision and Order testing as described in the Section entitled Preservation of Records Relating to Competent and Reliable Human Clinical Tests or Studies must be available for inspection and production to the Commission. Persons covered by this Section have the burden of proving that a product satisfies the definition of Essentially Equivalent Product.

II. PROHIBITED REPRESENTATIONS: OTHER HEALTH-RELATED CLAIMS IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents, Respondents’ officers, agents, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with the manufacturing, labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any Covered Product must not make, or assist others in making, expressly or by implication, any representation, other than representations covered under the Provision of this Order entitled Prohibited Representations: Health-Related Claims Requiring Human Clinical Testing For Substantiation, about the health benefits, performance, efficacy, safety, or side effects of any Covered Product, unless the representation is non-misleading, and, at the time of making such representation, they possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that is sufficient in quality and quantity based on standards generally accepted by experts in the relevant disease, condition, or function to which the representation relates, when considered in light of the entire body of relevant and reliable scientific evidence, to substantiate that the representation is true.

For purposes of this Provision, “competent and reliable scientific evidence” means tests, analyses, research, or studies (1) that have been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by experts in the relevant disease, condition, or function to which the representation relates; (2) that are generally accepted by such experts to yield accurate and reliable results; and (3) that are randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled human clinical testing of the Covered Product, or of an Essentially Equivalent Product, when such experts would generally require such human clinical testing to substantiate that the representation is true. In addition, when such tests or studies are human clinical tests or studies, all underlying or supporting data and documents generally accepted by experts in the field as relevant to an assessment of such testing as set forth in the Section entitled Preservation of Records Relating to Competent and Reliable Human Clinical Tests or Studies must be available for inspection and production to the Commission. Persons covered by this Provision have the burden of proving that a product satisfies the definition of Essentially Equivalent Product.

III.PRESERVATION OF RECORDS RELATING TO COMPETENT AND RELIABLE HUMAN CLINICAL TESTS OR STUDIES IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, with regard to any human clinical test or study (“test”) upon which Respondents rely to substantiate any claim covered by this Order, Respondents must secure and preserve all underlying or supporting data and documents generally accepted by experts in the field as relevant to an assessment of the test, including: VOLUME 171 Decision and Order A. all protocols and protocol amendments, reports, articles, write-ups, or other accounts of the results of the test, and drafts of such documents reviewed by the test sponsor or any other person not employed by the research entity; B. all documents referring or relating to recruitment; randomization; instructions, including oral instructions, to participants; and participant compliance; C. documents sufficient to identify all test participants, including any participants who did not complete the test, and all communications with any participants relating to the test; all raw data collected from participants enrolled in the test, including any participants who did not complete the test; source documents for such data; any data dictionaries; and any case report forms; D. all documents referring or relating to any statistical analysis of any test data, including any pretest analysis, intent-to-treat analysis, or between-group analysis performed on any test data; and E. all documents referring or relating to the sponsorship of the test, including all communications and contracts between any sponsor and the test’s researchers. Provided, however, the preceding preservation requirement does not apply to a reliably reported test, unless the test was conducted, controlled, or sponsored, in whole or in part by: (1) any Respondent; (2) any Respondent’s officers, agents, representatives, or employees; (3) any other person or entity in active concert or participation with any Respondent; (4) any person or entity affiliated with or acting on behalf of any Respondent; (5) any supplier of any ingredient contained in the product at issue to any of the foregoing or to the product’s manufacturer; or (6) the supplier or manufacturer of such product.

For purposes of this Provision, “reliably reported test” means a report of the test has been published in a peer-reviewed journal, and such published report provides sufficient information about the test for experts in the relevant field to assess the reliability of the results. For any test conducted, controlled, or sponsored, in whole or in part, by Respondents, Respondents must establish and maintain reasonable procedures to protect the confidentiality, security, and integrity of any personal information collected from or about participants. These procedures must be documented in writing and must contain administrative, technical, and physical safeguards appropriate to Corporate Respondents’ size and complexity, the nature and scope of Respondents’ activities, and the sensitivity of the personal information collected from or about the participants.

IV. PROHIBITED REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING TESTS, STUDIES, OR OTHER RESEARCH IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents, Respondents’ officers, agents, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection EPICHOUSE, LLC 345 Decision and Order with the manufacturing, labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any product must not misrepresent, in any manner, expressly or by implication: A. that any Covered Product is clinically proven to: 1. improve alertness, focus, or memory recall;

2. treat, alleviate, or cure age-related cognitive decline; anxiety; bipolar disorder; cancer; pain, including arthritis pain; depression; diabetes; heart disease; high blood pressure; inflammation; insomnia; and migraines; or 3. prevent age-related cognitive decline; anxiety; pain, including arthritis pain; cancer; diabetes; heart disease; hypertension; inflammation; insomnia; or migraines;

B. that the performance or benefits of a Covered Product are scientifically or clinically proven or otherwise established; or C. the existence, contents, validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of any test, study, or other research.

V. FDA-APPROVED CLAIMS IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that nothing in this Order prohibits Respondents, Respondents’ officers, agents, employees, and attorneys, or all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them from:

A. for any Drug, making a representation that is approved in labeling for such Drug under any tentative final or final monograph promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration, or under any new drug application approved by the Food and Drug Administration; and B. for any product, making a representation that is specifically authorized for use in labeling for such product by regulations promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration pursuant to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 or permitted under Sections 303-304 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997.

VI. MONETARY RELIEF IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

A. Respondents must pay to the Commission $30,000.00, which Respondents stipulate their undersigned counsel holds in escrow for no purpose other than payment to the Commission.

VOLUME 171 Decision and Order B. Such payment must be made within 8 days of the effective date of this Order by electronic fund transfer in accordance with instructions provided by a representative of the Commission.

VII. ADDITIONAL MONETARY PROVISIONS IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

A. Respondents relinquish dominion and all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in all assets transferred pursuant to this Order and may not seek the return of any assets.

B. The facts alleged in the Complaint will be taken as true, without further proof, in any subsequent civil litigation by or on behalf of the Commission to enforce its rights to any payment pursuant to this Order, such as a nondischargeability complaint in any bankruptcy case.

C. The facts alleged in the Complaint establish all elements necessary to sustain an action by or on behalf of the Commission pursuant to Section 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), and this Order will have collateral estoppel effect for such purposes.

D. All money paid to the Commission pursuant to this Order may be deposited into a fund administered by the Commission or its designee to be used for equitable relief, including consumer redress and any attendant expenses for the administration of any redress fund. If a representative of the Commission decides that direct redress to consumers is wholly or partially impracticable or money remains after redress is completed, the Commission may apply any remaining money for such other equitable relief (including consumer information remedies) as it determines to be reasonably related to Respondents’ practices alleged in the Complaint. Any money not used for such equitable relief is to be deposited to the U.S. Treasury as disgorgement. Respondents have no right to challenge any actions pursuant to this Provision.

VIII. NOTICES TO CUSTOMERS IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents must notify customers as follows: E. Respondents must identify all consumers who purchased CBD Products on or after September 1, 2019 (“eligible customers”).

1. Such eligible customers, and their contact information, must be identified to the extent such information is in Respondents’ possession, custody or control, including from third parties such as resellers; EPICHOUSE, LLC 347 Decision and Order 2. Eligible customers include those identified at any time, including after Respondents’ execution of the Agreement through the eligibility period, which runs for 1 year after the issuance date of the Order. F. Respondents must send a notice via electronic mail to all identified eligible customers:

1. The notice must be in the form shown in Attachment A. 2. The subject line of the email notice must state, “About Your Purchase from First Class Herbalist CBD.”

3. The email of the notice must not include any other attachments. G. Respondents must notify all eligible customers within 45 days after the issuance date of this Order and any eligible customers identified thereafter within 30 days of their identification.

H. Respondents must report on their notification program under penalty of perjury: 1. Respondents must submit a report within 90 days after the issuance date of this Order summarizing their compliance to date, including the total number of eligible customers identified and notified.

2. If a representative of the Commission requests any information regarding the program, including any of the underlying customer data, Respondents must submit it within 10 days of the request.

3. Failure to provide required notices or any requested information will be treated as a continuing failure to obey this Order.

IX. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS OF THE ORDER IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents obtain acknowledgments of receipt of this Order:

A. Each Respondent, within 10 days after the effective date of this Order, must submit to the Commission an acknowledgment of receipt of this Order sworn under penalty of perjury.

B. For 10 years after the issuance date of this Order, the Individual Respondent for any business that such Respondent, individually or collectively with any other Respondent, is the majority owner or controls directly or indirectly, and each Corporate Respondent, must deliver a copy of this Order to: (1) all principals, officers, directors, and LLC managers and members; (2) all employees having managerial responsibilities for labeling, manufacturing, advertising, marketing, VOLUME 171 Decision and Order promotion, distribution, offering for sale, or sale of any Covered Product and all agents and representatives who participate in labeling, manufacturing, advertising, marketing, promotion, distribution, offering for sale, or sale of any Covered Product; and (3) any business entity resulting from any change in structure as set forth in the Provision titled Compliance Reports and Notices. Delivery must occur within 10 days after the effective date of this Order for current personnel. For all others, delivery must occur before they assume their responsibilities. C. From the individual or entity to which a Respondent delivered a copy of this Order, that Respondent must obtain, within 30 days, a signed and dated acknowledgment of receipt of this Order.

X. COMPLIANCE REPORTS AND NOTICES IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents make timely submissions to the Commission:

A. Sixty days after the issuance date of this Order, each Respondent must submit a compliance report, sworn under penalty of perjury, in which: 1. Each Respondent must: (a) identify the primary physical, postal, and email address and telephone number, as designated points of contact, which representatives of the Commission, may use to communicate with Respondent; (b) identify all of that Respondent’s businesses by all of their names, telephone numbers, and physical, postal, email, and Internet addresses; (c) describe the activities of each business, including the goods and services offered, the means of advertising, marketing, and sales, and the involvement of any other Respondent (which Individual Respondent must describe if he knows or should know due to his own involvement); (d) describe in detail whether and how that Respondent is in compliance with each Provision of this Order, including a discussion of all of the changes the Respondent made to comply with the Order; and (e) provide a copy of each Acknowledgment of the Order obtained pursuant to this Order, unless previously submitted to the Commission.

2. Additionally, the Individual Respondent must: (a) identify all his telephone numbers and all his physical, postal, email and Internet addresses, including all residences; (b) identify all his business activities, including any business for which such Respondent performs services whether as an employee or otherwise and any entity in which such Respondent has any ownership interest; and (c) describe in detail such Respondent’s involvement in each such business activity, including title, role, responsibilities, participation, authority, control, and any ownership. EPICHOUSE, LLC 349 Decision and Order B. For 10 years after the issuance date of this Order, each Respondent must submit a compliance notice, sworn under penalty of perjury, within 14 days of any change in the following:

1. Each Respondent must report any change in: (a) any designated point of contact; or (b) the structure of any Corporate Respondent or any entity that Respondent has any ownership interest in or controls directly or indirectly that may affect compliance obligations arising under this Order, including: creation, merger, sale, or dissolution of the entity or any subsidiary, parent, or affiliate that engages in any acts or practices subject to this Order.

2. Additionally, the Individual Respondent must submit notice of any change in: (a) name, including alias or fictitious name, or residence address; or (b) title or role in any business activity, including (i) any business for which such Respondent performs services whether as an employee or otherwise and (ii) any entity in which such Respondent has any ownership interest and over which Respondents have direct or indirect control. For each such business activity, also identify its name, physical address, and any Internet address.

C. Each Respondent must submit notice of the filing of any bankruptcy petition, insolvency proceeding, or similar proceeding by or against such Respondent within 14 days of its filing.

D. Any submission to the Commission required by this Order to be sworn under penalty of perjury must be true and accurate and comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, such as by concluding: “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on: _____” and supplying the date, signatory’s full name, title (if applicable), and signature.

E. Unless otherwise directed by a Commission representative in writing, all submissions to the Commission pursuant to this Order must be emailed to [email protected] or sent by overnight courier (not the U.S. Postal Service) to: Associate Director for Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580. The subject line must begin: In re Epichouse, LLC.

XI. RECORDKEEPING IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents must create certain records for 10 years after the issuance date of the Order, and retain each such record for 5 years, unless otherwise specified below. Specifically, Corporate Respondents and the Individual Respondent for any VOLUME 171 Decision and Order business that such Respondent, individually or collectively with any other Respondents, is a majority owner or controls directly or indirectly, must create and retain the following records: A. accounting records showing the revenues from all goods or services sold, the costs incurred in generating those revenues, and resulting net profit or loss; B. personnel records showing, for each person providing services in relation to any aspect of the Order, whether as an employee or otherwise, that person’s: name; addresses; telephone numbers; job title or position; dates of service; and (if applicable) the reason for termination;

C. copies or records of all consumer complaints and refund requests, whether received directly or indirectly, such as through a third party, and any response; D. all records necessary to demonstrate full compliance with each provision of this Order, including all submissions to the Commission;

E. a copy of each unique advertisement or other marketing material making a representation subject to this Order; and F. for 5 years from the date of the last dissemination of any representation covered by this Order:

1. all materials that were relied upon in making the representation; and 2. all tests, studies, analysis, other research, or other such evidence in Respondents’ possession, custody, or control that contradicts, qualifies, or otherwise calls into question the representation, or the basis relied upon for the representation, including complaints and other communications with consumers or with governmental or consumer protection organizations;

I. for 5 years from the date received, copies of all subpoenas and other communications with law enforcement, if such communications relate to Respondents’ compliance with this Order; and J. for 5 years from the date created or received, all records, whether prepared by or on behalf of Respondents, that tend to show any lack of compliance by Respondents with this Order.

XII. COMPLIANCE MONITORING IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the purpose of monitoring Respondents’ compliance with this Order: suspended and any failure to transfer any assets as required by this Order:

EPICHOUSE, LLC 351 Decision and Order A. Within 10 days of receipt of a written request from a representative of the Commission, each Respondent must: submit additional compliance reports or other requested information, which must be sworn under penalty of perjury, and produce records for inspection and copying.

B. For matters concerning this Order, representatives of the Commission are authorized to communicate directly with each Respondent. Respondents must permit representatives of the Commission to interview anyone affiliated with any Respondent who has agreed to such an interview. The interviewee may have counsel present.

C. The Commission may use all other lawful means, including posing through its representatives as consumers, suppliers, or other individuals or entities, to Respondents or any individual or entity affiliated with Respondents, without the necessity of identification or prior notice. Nothing in this Order limits the Commission’s lawful use of compulsory process, pursuant to Sections 9 and 20 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 49, 57b-1.

D. Upon written request from a representative of the Commission, any consumer reporting agency must furnish consumer reports concerning Individual Respondents, pursuant to Section 604(2) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(a)(2).

XIII. ORDER EFFECTIVE DATES IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is final and effective upon the date of its publication on the Commission’s website (ftc.gov) as a final order. This Order will terminate 20 years from the date of its issuance (which date may be stated at the end of this Order, near the Commission’s seal), or 20 years from the most recent date that the United States or the Commission files a complaint (with or without an accompanying settlement) in federal court alleging any violation of this Order, whichever comes later; provided, however, that the filing of such a complaint will not affect the duration of:

A. any Provision in this Order that terminates in less than 20 years; B. this Order’s application to any Respondent that is not named as a defendant in such complaint; and C. this Order if such complaint is filed after the Order has terminated pursuant to this Provision.

Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the Respondent did not violate any provision of the Order, and the dismissal or ruling is either not appealed or upheld on appeal, then the Order will terminate according to this Provision as though the complaint had never been filed, except that the Order will not terminate between the date such VOLUME 171 Decision and Order complaint is filed and the later of the deadline for appealing such dismissal or ruling and the date such dismissal or ruling is upheld on appeal.

By the Commission.

ATTACHMENT A TO THE ORDER CLAIMS ABOUT PRODUCTS CONTAINING CBD In re Epichouse, LLC – First Class Herbalist CBD Dear <Name of customer>:

Our records show that you bought CBD Oil, CBD + Turmeric Oil, CBD Coffee, CBD Pain Rub, or CBD Gummies from www.firstclassherbalistcbd.com. We are writing to tell you that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the nation’s consumer protection agency, has sued us for making misleading claims that our CBD oil can effectively prevent, cure, treat, or ease serious diseases and health conditions, including the following: age-related cognitive decline, Alzheimer’s disease, arthritis, autoimmune disorder, bipolar disorder, cancer, colitis, Crohn’s disease, depression, diabetes, endocrine disorders, heart disease, high blood pressure, migraines, multiple sclerosis, neurodegeneration, obesity, Parkinson’s disease, prostate problems, psoriasis, rheumatism, schizophrenia, spinal cord injury, and stroke.

To settle the FTC’s lawsuit, we’re contacting our customers to tell them that we don’t have proof that our CBD products will effectively prevent, cure, treat, or improve the serious diseases and health conditions listed above. If you have other questions about this lawsuit, visit [add URL].

CBD oil and other alternative treatments might be harmful to your medical care and could interfere with your prescriptions. CBD products could also be dangerous if you take them with other medicines or at a high dose. Talk to your doctor before you take any treatments or stop any prescriptions. For more information about protecting yourself from bogus health product claims visit ftc.gov/health.

Sincerely, [Signature] John Le Owner Epichouse, LLC EPICHOUSE, LLC 353 Concurring Statement STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER ROHIT CHOPRA Summary • When companies lie about the effectiveness of their treatments for serious conditions, this harms patients and diverts sales away from firms that tell the truth. • Congress gave the FTC a new authority to crack down on abuses in the opioid treatment industry, but the agency has not prioritized this issue. This should change. • The FTC can increase its effectiveness when it comes to health claims by shifting resources away from small businesses and by deploying the unused Penalty Offense Authority.

Today, the Federal Trade Commission is taking action against several outfits regarding their outlandish – and unlawful – claims about cannabidiol (CBD). While CBD is currently the subject of considerable scientific research, there is no evidence yet that CBD can treat or cure cancer, Alzheimer’s, or other serious diseases. Baseless claims give patients false hope, improperly increase or divert their medical spending, and undermine “a competitor’s ability to compete” on honest attributes.1 I support these actions and congratulate those who made them a reality. Going forward, however, the FTC will need to refocus its efforts on health claims by targeting abuses in the substance use disorder treatment industry, shifting attention toward large businesses, and making more effective use of the FTC’s Penalty Offense Authority. First, COVID-19 and the resulting economic and social distress are fueling new concerns about substance use disorders. In particular, there are signs that the pandemic is leading to greater dependence on opioids.2 It is critical that the FTC take steps to prevent exploitation of patients seeking treatment for substance use disorders.

I am particularly concerned about abusive practices in the for-profit opioid treatment industry, and believe this should be a high priority. This industry has grown exponentially by profiting off those suffering from addiction. Many of these outfits use lead generators to steer 1 In re Pfizer, Inc., 81 F.T.C. 23, 62 (1972).

2 See, e.g., Jon Kamp & Arian Campo-Flores, The Opioid Crisis, Already Serious, Has Intensified During Coronavirus Pandemic, WALL STREET J. (Sept. 8, 2020), https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-opioid-crisis-already­ serious-has-intensified-during-coronavirus-pandemic-11599557401; Issue brief: Reports of increases in opioid- and other drug-related overdose and other concerns during COVID pandemic, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (last updated on Oct. 31, 2020), https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/opioids/covid-19-may-be-worsening-opioid­ crisis-states-can-take-action.

VOLUME 171 Concurring Statement Americans into high-cost, subpar treatment centers, and some even hire intermediaries – socalled “body brokers” – who collect kickbacks from this harmful practice.3 More than two years ago, Congress passed the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act. Among other provisions, the Act authorized the Commission to seek civil penalties, restitution, damages, and other relief against outfits that engage in misconduct related to substance use disorder treatment.4 The Commission is well positioned to help shut down these abuses, ensure they are not profitable, and hold predatory actors and their enablers to account.5 Unfortunately, the Commission has brought zero cases under this new authority. While I have supported actions like this one that challenge baseless CBD claims, as well as previous actions charging that pain relief devices and similar products were sold deceptively,6 I am concerned that we have largely ignored Congressional concerns about unlawful opioid treatment practices. I urge my fellow Commissioners to change course on our enforcement priorities, especially given our limited resources.

Second, the FTC should focus more of its enforcement efforts on larger firms rather than small businesses. Today’s actions focus on very small players, some of which are defunct. While I appreciate that small businesses can also harm honest competitors and families, they are often judgment-proof, making it unlikely victims will see any relief.7 I am confident that FTC staff can successfully challenge powerful, well-financed defendants that break the law. Finally, the Commission should reduce the prevalence of unlawful health claims by triggering civil penalties under the FTC’s Penalty Offense Authority.8 Under the Penalty Offense 3 For example, recent reporting describes the “Florida Shuffle,” where treatment facilities pay brokers to recruit patients through 12-step meetings, conferences, hotlines, and online groups, leading to serious harm. See German Lopez, She wanted addiction treatment. She ended up in the relapse capital of America, VOX (Mar. 2, 2020), https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/3/2/21156327/florida-shuffle-drug-rehab-addiction-treatment-bri­ jayne. See also Letter from Commissioner Chopra to Congress on Deceptive Marketing Practices in the Opioid Addiction Treatment Industry (July 28, 2018), https://www ftc.gov/public-statements/2018/07/letter-commissioner­ chopra-congress-deceptive-marketing-practices-opioid (calling on the FTC to do more to tackle this problem). 4 Pub. L. No. 115-271 §§ 8021-8023 (codified in 15 U.S.C. § 45d). The Act also allows the Commission to prosecute deceptive marketing of opioid treatment products. Notably, a number of respondents in this sweep are alleged to have made claims that CBD could replace OxyContin. 5 Given public reports regarding private equity rollups of smaller opioid treatment facilities, the Commission can also examine whether anticompetitive M&A strategies are leading to further patient harm. See Statement of Commissioner Rohit Chopra Regarding Private Equity Roll-ups and the Hart-Scott-Rodino Annual Report to Congress, Commu File No. P110014 (July 8, 2020), https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2020/07/statement­ commissioner-rohit-chopra-regarding-private-equity-roll-ups-hart. 6 Press Release, Fed. Trade Commu, Marketers of Pain Relief Device Settle FTC False Advertising Complaint (Mar. 4, 2020), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2020/03/marketers-pain-relief-device-settle-ftc­ false-advertising.

7 In one of these matters, the respondents are paying nothing. 8 15 U.S.C. § 45(m)(1)(b).

EPICHOUSE, LLC 355 Concurring Statement Authority, firms that engage in conduct they know has been previously condemned by the Commission can face civil penalties, in addition to the relief that we typically seek.9 For example, the Commission routinely issues warning letters to businesses regarding unsubstantiated health claims. Future warning letters can be more effective if they include penalty offense notifications.

The Commission has repeatedly found that objective claims require a reasonable basis,10 and apprising firms of these findings – along with a warning that noncompliance can result in penalties – makes it significantly more likely they will come into compliance voluntarily. In fact, when the Commission employed this strategy four decades ago, it reportedly resulted in a “high level of voluntary compliance achieved quickly and at a low cost.”11 Going forward, we should pursue this strategy.12 I thank everyone who made today’s actions possible, and look forward to future efforts that address emerging harms using the full range of our tools and authorities. 9 See Rohit Chopra & Samuel A.A. Levine, The Case for Resurrecting the FTC Act’s Penalty Offense Authority (Oct. 29, 2020), https://papers.ssrn.com/sole/papers.cfm?abstract id=3721256. Particularly given challenges to the FTC’s 13(b) authority, incorporating a penalty offense strategy can safeguard the Commission’s ability to seek strong remedies against lawbreakers.

10 This requirement was first established in the Commission’s 1972 Pfizer decision, and it has been affirmed repeatedly. Pfizer, Inc., supra note 2 (finding that “[f]airness to the consumer, as well as fairness to competitors” compels the conclusion that affirmative claims require a reasonable basis); In re Thompson Medical Co., 104 F.T.C. 648, 813 (1984) (collecting cases), aff’d, 791 F.2d 189 (D.C. Cir. 1986). Appended to Thompson Medical was the Commission’s Policy Statement Regarding Advertising Substantiation, which states that “a firm’s failure to possess and rely upon a reasonable basis for objective claims constitutes an unfair and deceptive act or practice in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.” Id. at 839. This standard continues to govern the Commission’s approach to substantiation, as recently reaffirmed in the Commission’s final order against POM Wonderful. In re POM Wonderful LLC et al., 155 F.T.C. 1, 6 (2013).

11 Commissioner Bailey made this observation in the context of opposing industry efforts to repeal this authority, an authority she described as an “extremely effective and efficient way to enforce the law.” Testimony of Commissioner Patricia P. Bailey Before the Subcomm. on Com., Tourism and Transp. of the Comm. on Energy and Com. of the H.R. Concerning the 1982 Reauthorization of the Fed. Trade Commu, at 11 (Apr. 1, 1982), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public statements/693551/19820401 bailey testimony before the sub corrmittee on commerce subcommittee on commerce touri.pdf. 12 My colleague, Commissioner Christine S. Wilson, has issued a statement in this matter. I agree that the Commission should not prioritize close-call substantiation cases, especially those involving small businesses. VOLUME 171 Concurring Statement CONCURRING STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. WILSON Today the Commission announces six settlements with marketers of cannabidiol (CBD) products resolving allegations that they made false, misleading, and/or unsubstantiated express disease claims for their products. I support these cases because accurate and complete information about products contributes to the efficient functioning of the market and facilitates informed consumer decision-making. In contrast, deceptive or false claims inhibit informed decision-making and may cause economic injury to consumers. The Commission’s complaints in these matters allege that the marketers claimed their products could treat, prevent, or cure diseases or serious medical conditions, including cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer’s, diabetes, and Parkinson’s disease, and that scientific research or clinical studies supported these claims. In fact, according to the Commission’s complaints, the proposed respondents did not conduct scientific research on the efficacy of their products to treat these diseases or conditions. In addition, the complaints allege that some of the proposed respondents claimed that their products could be taken in lieu of prescription medication. The Commission has been working with the FDA, and on its own, to combat false and unsubstantiated claims for CBD products, including through warning letters1 and a law enforcement action.2 Here, where consumers may have foregone proven measures to address serious diseases and the marketers have made virtually no effort to possess and rely on scientific evidence to support their strong, express disease claims, as we allege in our complaint, I agree that law enforcement is appropriate.

The Commission’s proposed consent orders in these matters require respondents to possess and rely on competent and reliable evidence, defined as randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled human clinical trials to support disease and other serious health claims for these types of products in the future.3 Although I support this requirement in these cases, for these types of claims, I caution that the Commission should impose this stringent substantiation requirement sparingly. Credible science supports the use of CBD products to treat certain conditions – specifically, the FDA has approved a drug containing CBD as an active ingredient 1 Press Release, FTC and FDA Warn Florida Company Marketing CBD Products about Claims Related to Treating Autism, ADHD, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and Other Medical Conditions, Oct. 22, 2019, available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2019/10/ftc-fda-warn-florida-company-marketing-cbd­ productsabout-claims; Press Release, FTC Sends Warning Letters to Companies Advertising Their CBD-Infused Products as Treatmentsfor Serious Diseases, Including Cancer, Alzheimer’s, and Multiple Sclerosis, Sept. 10, 2019, available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2019/09/ftc-sends-warning-letters-companies­ advertising-their-cbdinfused; Press Release, FTC Joins FDA in Sending Warning Letters to Companies Advertising and Selling Products Containing Cannabidiol (CBD) Claiming to Treat Alzheimer’s, Cancer, and Other Diseases, Apr. 2, 2019, available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2019/04/ftc-joins-fda-sending-warning­ letters-companiesadvertising.

2 Press Release, FTC Order Stops the Marketer of “Thrive” Supplement from Making Baseless Claims It Can Treat, Prevent, or Reduce the Risks from COVID-19, July 10, 2020, available at https://www.ftc.gov/newsevents/press­ releases/2020/07/ftc-order-stops-marketer-thrive-supplement-making-baseless-claims. 3 See, e.g., Part I of Proposed Order, In the Matter of Bionatrol Health, LLC, et. al. (Dec. 2020). EPICHOUSE, LLC 357 Concurring Statement to treat rare, severe forms of epilepsy.4 And I understand that many research studies are currently seeking to determine whether there are other scientifically valid and safe uses of this ingredient. I agree with my predecessors who have stated that the Commission should be careful to avoid imposing an unduly high standard of substantiation that risks denying consumers truthful, useful information, may diminish incentives to conduct research, and could chill manufacturer incentives to introduce new products to the market.5 And I agree with the observation of my colleague Commissioner Chopra in his statement that “[b]aseless claims give patients false hope, improperly increase or divert their medical spending, and undermine ‘a competitor’s ability to compete’ on honest attributes.”6 Although I support these cases, I hope that the Commission’s actions here, which challenge wholly unsubstantiated disease claims, do not discourage research into the potential legitimate benefits of CBD and a wide array of other products. In addition, going forward, I urge the Commission to focus our scarce resources on marketers that make strong, express claims about diseases and serious health issues with little to no scientific support and engage in deceptive practices that cause substantial consumer injury. 4 See FDA Press Release, FDA approves first drug comprised of an active ingredient derived from marijuana to treat rare, severe forms of epilepsy (June 25, 2018), available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press­ announcements/fda-approves-first-drug-comprised-active-ingredient-derived-marijuana-treat-rare-severe-forms. 5 See, e.g., Statement of Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen, In the Matter of Health Discovery Corporation and FTC v. Avrom Boris Lasarow, et al. (Feb. 2015), https://www ftc.gov/public-statements/2015/02/dissenting­ statement-commissioner-maureen-k-ohlhausen-matter-health; Statement of Commissioner Joshua D. Wright, FTC v. Kevin Wright; HCG Platinum, LLC; and Right Way Nutrition, LLC (Dec. 2014), https://www.ftc.gov/public­ statements/2014/12/statement-commissioner-joshua-d-wright-federal-trade-commission-v-kevin; Statement of Commissioner Joshua D. Wright, In the Matter of Genelink, Inc., and foru International Corporation (January 2014), https://www ftc.gov/public-statements/2014/01/statement-commissioner-joshua-d-wright-matter-genelink­ inc-foru; Statement of Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen Dissenting in Part and Concurring in Part, In the Matter of Genelink, Inc. and foru International Corporation (January 2014), https://www.ftc.gov/public­ statements/2014/01/statement-commissioner-maureen-k-ohlhausen-dissenting-part-concurring-part; Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen, FTC v. Springtech 77376, et al. (July 2013), https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2013/07/dissenting-statement-commissioner-maureen-k-ohlhausen; see also J. Howard Beales, III and Timothy J. Muris, In Defense of the Pfizer Factors, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 12-49 (May 2012), available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sole/papers.cfm?abstract id=2087776. 6 See Statement of Commissioner Rohit Chopra Regarding the Cannabidiol (CBD) Enforcement Actions (Dec. 17, 2020).

VOLUME 171 Analysis to Aid Public Comment ANALYSIS OF CONSENT ORDER TO AID PUBLIC COMMENT The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) has accepted, subject to final approval, an agreement containing a consent order with Epichouse, LLC (“Epichouse”), also doing business as First Class Herbalist CBD, Cobalt Serum, Cobalt Enhance, and Cobalt Cream, and John Le, individually and as an officer of Epichouse (collectively, “Respondents”). The proposed consent order (“order”) has been placed on the public record for 30 days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. After 30 days, the Commission will again review the order and the comments received, and will decide whether it should withdraw the order or make it final. This matter involves Respondents’ advertising for products containing cannabidiol (“CBD Products”), including First Class Herbalist CBD oil. The complaint alleges that Respondents violated Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act by disseminating false and unsubstantiated advertisements claiming that their CBD Products, among other things: are safe for all users; treat pain better than prescription medicine like OxyContin; prevent and treat numerous serious health conditions, including age-related cognitive decline, cancer, chronic pain, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and migraines; and are scientifically proven to improve many serious health conditions.

The order includes injunctive relief that prohibits these alleged violations and fences in similar and related conduct. The product coverage would apply to any dietary supplement, drug, or food that Respondents sell or market, including CBD Products. Part I prohibits Respondents from making any representation about the efficacy of any covered product, including that such product:

A. treats, alleviates, or cures age-related cognitive decline, neurodegeneration, or prostate problems;

B. prevents age-related cognitive decline, pain, hypertension, or migraines; C. treats, alleviates, or cures any disease, including but not limited to adult acne; Alzheimer’s disease; arthritis, autoimmune disorder; bipolar disorder; cancer; pain, including neuropathic pain, pain from spinal cord injuries, and pain from diseases like arthritis; colitis; Crohn’s disease; depression; diabetes; endocrine disorders; heart disease; high blood pressure; migraines; multiple sclerosis; obesity; Parkinson’s disease; psoriasis; rheumatism; strokes; or schizophrenia; D. replaces the need for prescription painkillers like oxycontin; or E. is safe for all consumers, EPICHOUSE, LLC 359 Analysis to Aid Public Comment unless the representation is non-misleading, including that, at the time such representation is made, they possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates that the representation is true.

For purposes of Part I, competent and reliable scientific evidence must consist of human clinical testing of the covered product, or of an essentially equivalent product, that is sufficient in quality and quantity based on standards generally accepted by experts in the relevant disease, condition, or function to which the representation relates, when considered in light of the entire body of relevant and reliable scientific evidence, to substantiate that the representation is true. Such testing must be: (1) randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled; and (2) conducted by researchers qualified by training and experience to conduct such testing. Part II prohibits Respondents from making any representation, other than representations covered under Part I, about the health benefits, performance, efficacy, safety, or side effects of any covered product, unless the representation is non-misleading, and, at the time of making such representation, they possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that is sufficient in quality and quantity based on standards generally accepted by experts in the relevant disease, condition, or function to which the representation relates, when considered in light of the entire body of relevant and reliable scientific evidence, to substantiate that the representation is true.

For purposes of Part II, “competent and reliable scientific evidence” means tests, analyses, research, or studies that (1) have been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by experts in the relevant disease, condition, or function to which the representation relates; (2) that are generally accepted by such experts to yield accurate and reliable results; and (3) that are randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled human clinical testing of the covered product, or of an essentially equivalent product, when such experts would generally require such human clinical testing to substantiate that the representation is true. Part III requires that, with regard to any human clinical test or study (“test”) upon which Respondents rely to substantiate any claim covered by the order, Respondents must secure and preserve all underlying or supporting data and documents generally accepted by experts in the field as relevant to an assessment of a test.

Part IV prohibits Respondents from misrepresenting the existence, contents, validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of any test, study, or other research or that any benefit of any covered product is scientifically or clinically proven. Part V provides Respondents a safe harbor for making claims approved by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”).

Parts VI and VII require Respondents to pay the Commission $30,000.00 and describes the procedures and legal rights related that payment.

Part VIII requires Respondents to send email notices to consumers who purchased First Class Herbalist Relief CBD oil informing them about the settlement. VOLUME 171 Analysis to Aid Public Comment Parts IX requires Respondents to submit an acknowledgement of receipt of the order, to serve the order on certain individuals, including all officers or directors of any business Respondents control and employees having managerial responsibilities for conduct related to the subject matter of the order, and to obtain acknowledgements from each individual or entity to which Respondents have delivered a copy of the order.

Part X requires Respondents to file compliance reports with the Commission and to notify the Commission of bankruptcy filings or changes in corporate structure that might affect compliance obligations. Part XI contains recordkeeping requirements for accounting records, personnel records, consumer correspondence, advertising and marketing materials, and claim substantiation, as well as all records necessary to demonstrate compliance or non-compliance with the order. Part XII contains other requirements related to the Commission’s monitoring of Respondents’ order compliance. Part XIII provides the effective dates of the order, including that, with exceptions, the order will terminate in 20 years. The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the order, and it is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of the complaint or order, or to modify the order’s terms in any way.

REEF INDUSTRIES, INC. 361 Complaint

← 171 F.T.C. 270 · 171 F.T.C. 361 →