Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Marc Ching

Volume 169 · 169 F.T.C. 678

Citation
169 F.T.C. 678
Docket
9394
Decision
2020-05-28
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
consumer protection
Outcome
other
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Marc Ching, 169 F.T.C. 678 (2020). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v169-0047

Report an error in this record (decision id v169-0047)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF MARC CHING, D/B/A WHOLE LEAF ORGANICS Docket No. 9394. Order, May 28, 2020 Order granting Complaint Counsel motion to withdraw this matter from adjudication for the purpose of the Commission’s consideration of a proposed consent agreement that would resolve this matter in its entirety. ORDER WITHDRAWING MATTER FROM ADJUDICATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING A PROPOSED CONSENT AGREEMENT Complaint Counsel having moved to withdraw this matter from adjudication in order to enable the Commission to consider a proposed Consent Agreement, and Respondent Ching having no objection to the motion;

Complaint Counsel and Respondent Ching, having submitted a proposed Consent Agreement containing a proposed Decision and Order, executed by Respondent Marc Ching and Complaint Counsel and approved by the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection that, if accepted by the Commission, would resolve this matter in its entirety; IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 3.25(c) of the Commission Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 3.25(c), that this matter in its entirety be, and it is hereby withdrawn from adjudication until July 17, 2020, and that all proceedings before the Administrative Law Judge are hereby stayed while the Commission evaluates the proposed Consent Agreement, pursuant to Rule 3.25(f), 16 C.F.R. § 3.25(f); and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 3.25(b) of the Commission Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 3.25(b), that the proposed Consent Agreement shall not be placed on the public record unless and until it is accepted by the Commission. By the Commission.

AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. 679 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.

← 169 F.T.C. 677 · 169 F.T.C. 679 →