Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Impax Laboratories, Inc.

Volume 165 · 165 F.T.C. 1482

Citation
165 F.T.C. 1482
Docket
9373
Decision
2018-05-31
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
antitrust
Industry
pharmaceuticals
Outcome
other
Relief
other
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Impax Laboratories, Inc., 165 F.T.C. 1482 (2018). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v165-0044

Report an error in this record (decision id v165-0044)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.

Docket No. 9373. Order, May 31, 2018 Order granting the joint motion to revise the briefing schedule for appeals in this matter.

ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPEALS Complaint Counsel and Respondent have filed a Joint Motion to revise the briefing schedule for appeals in this matter.1 The parties requested these modest extensions due to the voluminous record and longstanding holiday and travel commitments that would be impacted in the absence of an extension. Pursuant to Commission Rule 4.3(b), 16 C.F.R. § 4.3(b), the Commission has determined, for good cause shown, to grant the Joint Motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT opening briefs must be filed on or before July 2, 2018, and, if a party files an opening appeal brief by that date, its appeal from the Initial Decision will be treated as having been perfected in accordance with Commission Rule 3.52(b), 16 C.F.R. § 3.52(b);

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT any answering brief must be filed on or before August 10, 2018; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT any reply brief must be filed on or before August 24, 2018. By the Commission.

1 At the time of the Joint Motion, only Complaint Counsel had filed a Notice of Appeal. Subsequently, Respondent filed a Notice of Cross-Appeal. ALIMENTATION COUCHE-TARD INC. 1483 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.

← 165 F.T.C. 1479 · 165 F.T.C. 1483 →