Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners

Volume 151 · 151 F.T.C. 634

Citation
151 F.T.C. 634
Docket
9343
Decision
2011-02-03
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
antitrust
Industry
dental services
Outcome
other
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

trade association collusion

Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.

Cite this decision

North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, 151 F.T.C. 634 (2011). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v151-0020

Report an error in this record (decision id v151-0020)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

VOLUME 151 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.

THE NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS Docket No. 9343. Order, February 3, 2011 Order denying respondent’s motion to dismiss, granting complaint counsel’s motion for partial summary decision, denying respondent’s motion to disqualify the Commission, and granting respondent’s motion for leave to file limited surreply brief.

ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY DECISION, DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE COMMISSION, AND GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LIMITED SURREPLY BRIEF The Commission has considered Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss on state action grounds (which the Commission has treated as a motion for summary decision) and Complaint Counsel’s Motion for Partial Summary Decision on state action grounds, Respondent’s Motion to Disqualify the Commission, and Respondent’s Motion for Leave to File Limited Surreply Brief, as well as both parties’ memoranda of law in support of and in opposition to these motions. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, the Commission has determined to deny Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss, to grant Complaint Counsel’s Motion for Partial Summary Decision, to deny Respondent’s Motion to Disqualify the Commission,’ and to grant Respondent’s Motion for Leave to File Limited Surreply Brief. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (which the Commission has treated as a motion for summary decision) be, and it hereby is, DENIED. ' An opinion setting forth the reasons for denying this motion is forthcoming.

THE NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS 635 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.

II.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Complaint Counsel’s Motion for Partial Summary Decision, be, and it hereby is, GRANTED and Respondent’s state action defense is DISMISSED. Il.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Respondent’s Motion to Disqualify the Commission, be, and it hereby is, DENIED. IV.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Respondent’s Motion for Leave to File Limited Surreply Brief, be, and it hereby is, GRANTED.

By the Commission, Commissioner Brill recused.

← 151 F.T.C. 607 · 151 F.T.C. 636 →