Gemtronics, Inc
Volume 150 · 150 F.T.C. 846
Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.
Cite this decision
Gemtronics, Inc, 150 F.T.C. 846 (2010). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v150-0024
Report an error in this record (decision id v150-0024)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
VOLUME 150 Interlocutory Orders, Etc.
GEMTRONICS, INC. AND WILLIAM H. ISELY Docket No. 9330. Order, October 7, 2010 Order holding that oral argument on Respondents’ appeal of the Chief Administrative Law Judge’s Initial Decision regarding attorney fees is unnecessary.
ORDER DISPENSING WITH ORAL ARGUMENT In this matter, Respondents appeal from the Chief Administrative Law Judge’s Initial Decision on Respondents’ Application for an Award of Attorney Fees and Other Expenses. Commission Rule 3.52(h) contemplates oral argument in cases on appeal to the Commission, “unless the Commission otherwise orders on its own initiative.”! In this case, the Commission has received extensive briefing from the parties on the issues presented by Respondents’ appeal, as well as briefing from a third party as amicus curiae. It is unlikely that oral argument would provide any additional information the parties have not already thoroughly addressed in their briefs, and the Commission has therefore determined that oral argument in this matter is not necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT no oral argument will be held in this matter.
By the Commission.
' 16 CFR. § 3.52(h) (2010); see also 16 C.F.R. § 3.52(b)(2) (2010) (applicable to cases which were initiated after Jan. 13, 2009); 74 Fed. Reg. 1804, 1834 (Jan. 13, 2009).