Rambus Incorporated
Volume 140 · 140 F.T.C. 1138
Cite this decision
Rambus Incorporated, 140 F.T.C. 1138 (2005). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v140-0024
Report an error in this record (decision id v140-0024)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF RAMBUS INCORPORATED ORDER REOPENING THE RECORD TO ADMIT INTO EVIDENCE THE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE FILED BY THE PARTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMMISSION’S ORDER OF MAY 13, 2005, AS AMENDED, AND DIRECTING BRIEFING OF ISSUES RELATED TO SUCH SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE On June 17, 2005, Complaint Counsel and Respondent separately filed supplemental evidence in accordance with the terms of the Commission’s Order of May 13, 2005, as modified by the Commission’s Order of June 13, 2005 (hereinafter “the supplemental evidence”). After having first consulted with each other, Complaint Counsel and Respondent each filed a response to the filing of the other, neither of which raised any objection to the admission into evidence of the supplemental evidence. The Commission has determined that it should (1) reopen the record to admit into evidence the supplemental evidence and (2) order additional briefing and other proceedings in light of the admission of such evidence. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the record in this proceeding shall be, and it hereby is, REOPENED to admit into evidence the supplemental evidence; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:
1. On or before August 10, 2005, Complaint Counsel and Respondent shall each file amended proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in light of the supplemental evidence, and provide cross-references to the earlier proposed findings of the parties and to the related provisions in the Initial Decision;
2. The amended proposed findings required by Paragraph 1. of VOLUME 140 Order this Order shall also include the identification of any misstatements or misrepresentations of fact that may have been previously made by any person during the course of this matter that can now be identified by reason of the supplemental evidence;
3. On or before August 10, 2005, Complaint Counsel or Respondent may file any motions seeking additional relief or inferences resulting from or relating to any alleged spoliation of evidence by Respondent; and 4. On or before August 17, 2005, Complaint Counsel and Respondent shall each file their responses, if any, to the filings required or permitted by Paragraphs 1. or 3. of this Order.
By the Commission.
VOLUME 140 Order