Bruno'S Inc

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

TK THE MATTER OF BRUNO' INe.

CONSENT ORDER, ETe. , TN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLA TION OF THE FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT A';D SEe. 5 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-3760. Complaint, July 1997--Decision, July 1997 This consent order requires, among other things, the Alabama-based grocery chain to comply with the provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act requiring the consumers to be notified when they are denied credit, insurance or ajob based in whole or in part on information in their credit report and requiring the denying company to provide the name and address of the consumer reporting agency that supplied the report.

Appearances For the Commission: Tom Carter and Wiliam D. Griggs. respondent: Mark Taliaserro, Burr Forman For the Binningham, AL COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 e. 1681 et seq. and the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 USe. 41 et seq. and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Bruno, Inc. , a corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Acts, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows:

DEFII\ITIONS For the purposes of this complaint, the following definitions are applicable. The tenns consumer consumer report and consumer reporting agency shall be defined as provided in Sections 603(c), 603(d), and 603(f), respectively, of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S. e. 168Ia(c), 168Ia(d) and 1681a(f).

PARAGRAH 1. Respondent Bruno, Inc. is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the BRUNO' , me. 127 126 Decision and Order laws of the State of Alabama, with its office and principal place of business located at 800 Lakeshore Parkway, Binningham, Alabama. PAR. 2. Respondent, in the ordinary course and conduct of its business, uses infonnation in consumer reports obtained from consumer reporting agencics in the consideration, acceptance, and denial of applicants for employment with respondent. PAR. 3. The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce " is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act. PAR. 4. Respondent, in the ordinary course and conduct of its business, has denied applications or rescinded offers for employment with respondent based in whole or in part on information supplied by a consumer reporting agency, but has failed to advise consumers that the information so supplied contributed to the adverse action taken on their applications or offers for employment, and has failed to advise consumers of the name and address of the consumer reporting agency that supplied the infonnation.

PAR. 5. By and through the practices described in paragraph four respondent has violated thc provisions of Section 6l5(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, IS U. e. 168Im(a). PAR. 6. By its aforesaid failure to comply with Section 615(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and pursuant to Section 621 (a) thereof respondent has engaged in unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a)(l) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Dallas Regional Offce proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violations of Section 615(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Aet; and The respondent, its attorneys, and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order an admission by the respondent of al1 the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an Decision and Order 124 F.TC. admission by respondent that the Jaw has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission s Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having detennined that it had reason to believe that the respondent has violated the said Act, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days, now in further confonnity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34 of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings and enters the following order:

I. Respondent Bruno, Inc. , is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Alabama, with its office and principal place of business located at 800 Lakeshore Parkway, Binningham, Alabama. 2. The acts and practices of the respondent alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as " commerce " is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act. 3. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction ofthc subject matter ofthis proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER For the purpose of this order, the tenns "consumer consumer report " and" consumer reporting agency" shall be defined as provided in Sections 603(c), 603(d), and 603(f), respectively, of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U. e. 168Ia(c), 1681a(d), and 1681 a(f).

It is ordered That respondent Bruno, Inc. , a corporation, its successors and assigns, and its offcers, agents, representatives, and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with any application for employment do forthwith cease and desist from failing, whenever employment is denied either wholly or partly because of infonnation contained in a consumer report from a consumer reporting agency, to disclose to the BRlmO' , INe. 129 126 Decision and Order applicant for employment at the time such adverse action is communicated to the applicant (a) that the adverse action was based wholly or parly on infonnation eontaincd in such a report and (b) the name and address of the consumer reporting agency making the report. Respondent shall not be held liable for a violation of Section 6l5(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act if it shows by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time ofthe alleged violation it maintained reasonable procedures to assure compliance with Section 615(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. II.

It is further ordered That respondent, and its successors and assigns, shall for at least five (5) years ITom the date of issuance of this order, maintain and upon request make available to the Federal Trade Commission for inspection and copying, documents demonstrating compliancc with the requiremcnts of Part I of this , allorder, such documents to include, but not be limited to employment evaluation criteria relating to consumer reports instructions given to employees regarding compliance with the provisions of this order, all written notices or a written or electronically stored notation of the description of thc fonn of notice and date such notice was provided to applicants pursuant to any provisions of this order, and the complete application files for applicants for whom consumer reports were obtained for whom offers of employment are not made or have been withheld, withdrawn, or rescinded based, in whole or in part, on infonnation contained in a consumer report, It is further ordered That respondent shall deliver a copy of this order at least once per year for a period of five (5) years from the date of issuance of this order, to all persons responsible for the respondent' s compliance with Section 615(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

It is further ordered That respondent shall notify the Federal Trade Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed Decision and Order 124 FTC. change in the corporatc structure of respondent such as dissolution assignment, or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor operation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or divisions, or any other change in thc corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of the order.

It is further ordered That respondent shall, within sixty (60) days of service of this order, file with the Federal Trade Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order.

VI.

It is further ordered That this order will tenninate on July 29 2017, or twcnty (20) years from the most recent date that the United States or the Federal Trade Commission files a complaint (with or without an accompanying consent decree) in federal court alleging any violation of the order, whichever comes later; provided, however that thc filing of such a complaint will not affect the duration of: A Any paragraph in this order that tcnninates in less than twenty (20) years;

B. This order s application to any respondent that is not named as a defendant in such complaint; and e. This order if such complaint is filed after the order has tcrminated pursuant to this paragraph.

Provided further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the respondent did not violate any provision of the order and the dismissal or ruling is either not appealed or upheld on appeal then thc order will tenninate according to this paragraph as though the complaint was never filed, except that the order will not tcnninate between the date such complaint is filed and the later of the deadline for appealing such dismissal or ruling and the date such dismissal or ruling is upheld on appeal.

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INe. 131 131 Complaint