Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Giant Food, Inc

Volume 120 · 120 F.T.C. 617

Citation
120 F.T.C. 617
Docket
6459
Decision
1995-09-07
Document type
set aside order
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
retail grocery
Outcome
set aside
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

price discrimination

Cite this decision

Giant Food, Inc, 120 F.T.C. 617 (1995). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v120-0042

Report an error in this record (decision id v120-0042)

Order status: set_aside Commission order action. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF GIANT FOOD, INC.

SET ASIDE ORDER IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 6459. Modified Consent Order, April 13, 1964--Set Aside Order, Sept. 7, 1995 This order reopens a 1964 consent order--which prohibited Giant from inducing its suppliers to offer, or to receive from its suppliers, compensation for promotional services or facilities on terms that Giant knew were not proportionally equal to the terms those suppliers offered other retailers--and sets aside the consent order pursuant to the Commission's 1994 Sunset Policy Statement, under which the Commission presumed that the public interest requires terminating competition orders that are more than 20 years old. ORDER REOPENING PROCEEDING AND SETTING ASIDE ORDER On June 5, 1995, Giant Food, Inc. ("Giant Food") filed its Request To Reopen and Vacate Order ("Petition") in this matter. Respondent requests that the Commission set aside the 1964 order, pursuant to Section 5(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(b), Rule 2.51 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.51, and the Statement of Policy With Respect to Duration of Competition Orders and Statement of Intention to Solicit Public Comment With Respect to Duration of Consumer Protection Orders, issued on July 22, 1994, and published at 59 Fed. Reg. 45,286-92 (Sept. 1, 1994) ("Sunset Policy Statement"). In the Petition, respondent affirmatively states that it has complied with the terms of the order. The Petition was placed on the public record for thirty days, and no comments were received.

The Commission in its Sunset Policy Statement said, in relevant part, that "effective immediately, the Commission will presume, in the context of petitions to reopen and modify existing orders, that the public interest requires setting aside orders in effect for more than twenty years."’ The Commission's cease and desist order in Docket No. 6459, issued on June 1, 1961, affirmed as modified by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on June | sunset Policy Statement, 59 Fed. Reg. at 45,289. Set Aside Order 120 F.T.C.

14, 1962, and modified by the Commission in accordance with the direction of the court on April 13, 1964, has been in effect for over thirty-one years. Consistent with the Commission's Sunset Policy Statement, the presumption is that the order should be terminated. Nothing to overcome the presumption having been presented, the Commission has determined to reopen the proceeding and set aside the order in Docket No. 6459.

Accordingly, It is ordered, That this matter be, and it hereby is, reopened;

It is further ordered, That the Commission's order in Docket No. 6459 be, and it hereby is, set aside, as of the effective date of this order.

THE SCOTTS COMPANY 619 619 Complaint

← 120 F.T.C. 613 · 120 F.T.C. 619 →