Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Atlas Supply Company

Volume 120 · 120 F.T.C. 593

Citation
120 F.T.C. 593
Docket
5794
Decision
1995-08-24
Document type
set aside order
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
automotive products
Outcome
set aside
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

price discrimination

Cite this decision

Atlas Supply Company, 120 F.T.C. 593 (1995). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v120-0037

Report an error in this record (decision id v120-0037)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF ATLAS SUPPLY COMPANY SET ASIDE ORDER IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 2 OF THE CLAYTON ACT AND SEC. 5 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 5794. Consent Order, July 19, 195]--Set Aside Order, Aug. 24, 1995 This order reopens a 1951 consent order--which prohibited Atlas from receiving illegal allowances or knowingly accepting or inducing discriminatory prices in their purchase of automotive tires, tubes, batteries, accessories or other automobile products--and sets aside the consent order pursuant to the Commission's Sunset Policy Statement, under which the Commission presumes that the public interest requires terminating competition orders that are more than 20 years old.

ORDER REOPENING PROCEEDING AND SETTING ASIDE ORDER On May 23, 1995, Atlas Supply Company ("Atlas") and its shareholders Chevron U.S.A., Inc., and BP Exploration and Oil, Inc., as respondents and successors to four of the six respondents named in the order, filed their Petition To Reopen and Set Aside Order ("Petition") in this matter. Thereafter, Amoco Oil Holding Company and Exxon Corporation, as respondents and successors to the two remaining respondents named in the order, filed Statements in Support of the Petition in which they joined in the Petition. The respondents request that the Commission set aside the 1951 order, pursuant to Section 5(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(b), Rule 2.51 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.51, and the Commission's Statement of Policy With Respect to Duration of Competition Orders and Statement of Intention to Solicit Public Comment With Respect to Duration of Consumer Protection Orders, issued July 22, 1994, and published at 59 Fed. Reg. 45,286-92 (Sept. 1, 1994) ("Sunset Policy Statement"). In the Petition and the Statements in Support of the Petition, each respondent affirmatively states that it has complied with the terms of the order. The Petition was placed on the public record for thirty days, and no comments were received.

Set Aside Order 120 F.T.C.

The Commission in its Sunset Policy Statement said, in relevant part, that "effective immediately, the Commission will presume, in the context of petitions to reopen and modify existing orders, that the public interest requires setting aside orders in effect for more than twenty years."'! The Commission's cease and desist order in Docket No. 5794, issued on July 19, 1951, and modified by the Commission on October 8, 1985, has been in effect for forty-four years. Consistent with the Commission's Sunset Policy Statement, the presumption is that the order should be terminated. Nothing to overcome the presumption having been presented, the Commission has determined to reopen the proceeding and set aside the order in Docket No. 5794.

Accordingly, It is ordered, That this matter be, and it hereby is, reopened;

It is further ordered, That the Commission's order in Docket No. 5794 be, and it hereby is, set aside as of the effective date of this order.

! Sunset Policy Statement, 59 Fed. Reg. at 45, 289. P. LORILLARD CO. 595 595 Set Aside Order

← 120 F.T.C. 577 · 120 F.T.C. 595 →