Promodes, S.A
Volume 116 · 116 F.T.C. 388
Cite this decision
Promodes, S.A, 116 F.T.C. 388 (1993). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v116-0031
Report an error in this record (decision id v116-0031)
Cited by 7 later FTC decisions
- VALASSIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC cited_neutral
- NEGOTIATED DATA SOLUTIONS LLC cited_neutral
- U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND AMERCO cited_neutral
- U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND AMERCO cited_neutral
- JACOB J. ALIFRAGHIS D/B/A INSTANTUPCCODES.COM cited_neutral
- 680 DIGITAL, INC. D/B/A NATIONWIDE BARCODE; AND PHILIP B. PERETZ cited_neutral
- FORTILINE, LLC cited_neutral
Cites
- 113 F.T.C. 372 — IMPORT IMAGE INC., ET AL cited_neutral
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF PROMODES, S.A., ET AL.
Docket 9228. Consent Order, May 17, 1990--Modifying Order, May 21, 1993 This order reopens the proceeding and modifies the Commissions consent order issued May 17, 1990 (113 FTC 372) by setting aside paragraphs II.A.] and II.A.2, thereby relieving the respondents of the obligation to divest the two stores described in those paragraphs.
ORDER REOPENING AND MODIFYING ORDER ISSUED MAY 17, 1990 On May 12, 1993, the Commission issued an Order to Show Cause within 30 days why the 1990 order in Docket No. 9228 should not be modified to set aside paragraphs II.A.1. and II.A.2. On May 14, 1993, respondents Promodes, S.A. and The Red Food Stores, Inc. filed their Answer of Respondents to Order to Show Cause, stating that respondents agree with the Commission's proposal and urge the Commission to enter an order deleting paragraphs IJ.A.] and II.A.2 to make clear that respondents no longer have an obligation to divest the two stores described in those paragraphs.
Accordingly, it is ordered, that this matter be and it hereby is reopened and that paragraph II of the order in this matter be modified, as of the date this order becomes final, to set aside paragraphs IT.A.1]. and II.A.2.
AECLEVITE, INC. 389 389 Complaint