Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Connecticut Chiropractic Association

Volume 114 · 114 F.T.C. 708

Citation
114 F.T.C. 708
Docket
C-3351
Complaint
1991-11-19
Decision
1991-11-19
Document type
consent order
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
chiropractic services
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting; recordkeeping; notice_to_customers
Order term (years)
5
Commission counsel
Andrew D. Caverly and Phoebe D. Morse
Respondent counsel
Robert L. Hirtle, Jr. , Ragin, Nassau, Kaplan Lassman HiTtle Hartford, CT
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

trade association collusion

Cite this decision

Connecticut Chiropractic Association, 114 F.T.C. 708 (1991). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v114-0054

Report an error in this record (decision id v114-0054)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE :\A TTER 0 F CONNECTICUT CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION CONSENT ORDER , ETC. , I1' REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATIO" OF SEC. 5 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIO:\ ACT Docket C-3351. Complaint, 1.\1ov. 1991-Decision VOV. , 1991 This consent order requires, among other things, an association of approximately 350 chiropractors to cease and desist from prohibiting, regulating, or interfering with its members offering free services or services at discounted fees and from prohibiting, regulating, or interfering with its members ' advertising. Appearances For the Commission: Andrew D. Caverly and Phoebe D. Morse. For the respondent: Robert L. Hirtle, Jr. , Ragin, Nassau, Kaplan Lassman HiTtle Hartford, CT.

COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that the Connecticut Chiropractic Association, a corporation, has violated the provisions of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Federal Trade Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues this complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Connecticut Chiropractic Association respondent" or "CCA") is a corporation formed and doing business pursuant to the laws of the State of Connecticut. Respondent is a voluntary association of approximately 350 chiropractors, constituting approximately 86 percent of the chiropractors practicing in Connecticut. Its principal business office is located at 28 Main Street, East Hartford, Connecticut.

PAR. 2. Respondent is a corporation organized for the purpose among others, of serving the interests of its members by associating them into a practical business organization and is engaged in substantial activities that further its members' pecuniary interests. By CO?-:\ECTICUT CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION 709 708 Complaint virtue of its purposes and activities, respondent is a corporation within the meaning of Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U. C. 44.

PAR. 3. Respondent's members are engaged in the business of providing chiropractic services for a fee. Except to the extent that competition has been restrained as alleged herein, and depending on their geographic location, respondent' s members have been and are now in competition among themselves and with other chiropractors. PAR. 4. The acts and practices of CCA, including those herein alleged, are in commerce or affect commerce within the meaning of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 C. 45.

PAR. 5. Respondent has acted as a combination of its members, or conspired with at least some of its members, to restrain competition among chiropractors in the State of Connecticut by prohibiting its members from offering free services and services at discounted fees and from disseminating truthful, non deceptive information through advertising and other means.

PAR. 6. In furtherance of the combination or conspiracy alleged in paragraph five, CCA has engaged in the following acts or practices among others:

A. Adopted and maintained provisions in its Ethical Code that prohibit its members from:

1. Offering free services or services at discounted fees to consumers, thereby deterring price competition among members; 2. Advertising free or discounted services to consumers, including by use of coupons, thereby deterring members from offering such services and depriving consumers of truthful information; 3. Advertising that CCA considers to be "sensational undignified " and not in "good taste " thereby discouraging advertising that is effective because it attracts attention or is memorable; and 4. Implying that they possess "unusual expertise" without meeting additional experience and educational requirements that a recognized chiropractic accrediting agency has approved, thereby depriving consumers of truthful information regarding the quality of chiropractors in areas of practice for which no certification exists, and the quality of chiropractors who acquire expertise in areas of practice without receiving certification.

B. Coerced its members to comply with its Ethical Code by, among other things:

Decision and Order II4 F. 1. Threatening members who violate the Code with expulsion from CCA;

2. Threatening, in the CCA quarterly journal and at CCA meetings members who advertise free or discounted services that CCA will attempt to influence health insurance companies to disallow or reduce reimbursements to their patients; and 3. Threatening, in the CCA quarterly journal and at CCA meetings members who violate the Code that CCA will report them to chiropractic malpractice insurance carriers. PAR. 7. Respondent's actions described in paragraphs five and six have had, or have the tendency and capacity to have, the following effects, among others:

A. Restraining competition among chiropractors with respect to price, quality, and other terms of service; B. Depriving consumers of truthful, non deceptive information about the availability, price, and quality of chiropractic services; and C. Depriving consumers of the benefits of free and open competition among chiropractors.

PAR. 8. The combination or conspiracy and the acts and practices described above constitute unfair methods of competition and unfair acts and practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U. C. 45. Such combination or conspiracy, or the effects thereof, is continuing and will continue or recur absent the entry against respondent of appropriate relief. DECISION A:\D ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Boston Regional Office proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and The respondent, its attorney, and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order an admission by the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that the law has been violated as alleged CONNECTICUT CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATJO:\ 711 708 Decision and Order in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission s Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondent has violated the said Act, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days, and having duly considered the comment filed thereafter by an interested person pursuant to Section 34 of its rules, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2. 34 of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings and enters the following order:

1. Respondent Connecticut Chiropractic Association is a corporation, organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Connecticut, with its principal business office located at 28 Main Street, East Hartford, Connecticut. 2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered That for the purposes of this order, the following definitions shall apply:

A. CCA" means the Connecticut Chiropractic Association and its Executive Board, committees, officers, directors, agents, representatives, employees, successors, and assigns; B. Disciplinary action means, but is not limited to, revocation or suspension of, or refusal to grant, membership, or the imposition of a reprimand, warning, probation, or any other penalty or condition; C. Person means any natural person, corporation, partnership, unincorporated association, or other entity; and D. Regulating means (1) adopting or maintaining any rule regulation, interpretation, ethical ruling, policy, or course of conduct; (2) taking or threatening to take formal or informal disciplinary action; or (3) conducting investigations or inquiries. 712 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIO?-S Decision and Order II4 F. II.

It is further ordered That CCA, directly or indirectly, or through any corporate or other device, in connection with its activities in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, shall forthwith cease and desist from: A. Prohibiting, regulating, or interfering with any of the following practices of its members:

1. Offering free services or services at discounted fees to consumers;

2. Advertising, including but not limited to: (a) Advertising free services or services at discounted fees to consumers, including by use of coupons;

(b) Advertising that CCA considers to be "sensational undignified " or not in "good taste; " and (c) Implying that they possess "unusual expertise provided however that CCA may restrict members ' claims of specialization unless additional experience and educational requirements have been met that are approved by a recognized chiropractic accrediting agency.

B. Inducing, suggesting, urging, encouraging, or assisting any nongovernmental person or organization to take any action that if taken by CCA would violate Part II.A. of this order. Provided That nothing contained in this order shall prohibit CCA from adopting, maintaining, and enforcing reasonable ethical guidelines governing the conduct of its members with respect to representations, advertising, or other communications that CCA reasonably believes would be false or deceptive within the meaning of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

It is further ordered That CCA shall:

A. Distribute by first-class mail hard copies of this order, thc accompanying complaint, and an announcement in the form shown in Appendix A to this order in the following manner: (1) Within thirty (30) days after the date this order becomes final, to each CCA member; and CO:\NECTICUT CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATJO:\ 713 70S Decision and Order (2) For five (5) years after the date this order becomes final, to each applicant for membership in CCA within thirty (30) days after CCA receives such application;

B. Within ninety (90) days after the date this order becomes final publish this order, the accompanying complaint, and an announcement in the form shown in Appendix A to this order in The Connecticut Yankee (CCA' s quarterly journal), or any successor publication, in the same size type normally used for articles that are published in The Connecticut Yankee or in that successor publication; C. Within thirty (30) days after this order becomes final, remove from CCA' s Ethical Code, Bylaws, and any other existing policy statement or guideline of CCA, any provision, interpretation, or policy statement that is inconsistent with Part II of this order; D. Within sixty (60) days after this order becomes final, publish and distribute to all members of CCA and to all personnel, agents, or representatives of CCA, revised versions of CCA' s Ethical Code Bylaws, and any other existing policy statement or guideline of CCA; E. File with the Federal Trade Commission within one hundred and twenty (120) days after the date this order becomes final, one (1) year after the date this order becomes final, and at such other times as the Federal Trade Commission may by written notice to CCA request, a verified report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which CCA has complied and is complying with this order; F. For a period of five (5) years after the date this order becomes final, maintain and make available to the Federal Trade Commission staff for inspection and copying, upon reasonable notice, records adequate to describe in detail all action taken in connection with any activity covered by Parts II and II of this order, including all written communications and all summaries of oral communications, and all disciplinary action; and G. Notify the Federal Trade Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed changes in CCA , such as dissolution or reorganization resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation or association, or any other change in the corporation or association which may affect compliance obligations arising out of this order. Commissioner Yao not participating.

714 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIO:\ DECISIONS Decision and Order II4 F. APPE?-DIX A (Date) A?-NOUNCEMENT As you may be aware, the Connecticut Chiropractic Association CCA") has entered into a consent agreement with the Federal Trade Commission that became final on rDate J. The order issued pursuant to the consent agreement provides that CCA may not interfere if its members wish to engage in any of the following activities: (1) Offering free services or services at discounted fees to consumers;

(2) Advertising free services or services at discounted fees to consumers, including by use of coupons;

(3) Advertising that CCA considers to be "sensational undignified " or not in "good taste; and (4) Implying that they possess "unusual expertise " provided however, that CCA may restrict members ' claims of specialization unless additional experience and educational requirements have been met that are approved by a recognized chiropractic accrediting agency.

The order does not prevent CCA from formulating reasonable ethical guidelines prohibiting advertising or other communications that CCA reasonably believes would be false or deceptive within the meaning of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. In particular, the agreement between CCA and the Federal Trade Commission means that as long as its members do not engage in falsehood or deception, CCA cannot prevent or discourage them from engaging in the practices listed above, among others. For more specific information you should refer to the FTC order itself. A copy of the order is enclosed.

Keith Overland, D.

President Connecticut Chiropractic Association REMOVATRON INTER:\ATIONAL CORPORATION, ET AL. 715 7I5 Modifying Order

← 114 F.T.C. 702 · 114 F.T.C. 715 →