Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Liquid Air Corp. of North America

Volume 111 · 111 F.T.C. 135

Citation
111 F.T.C. 135
Docket
C-2990
Decision
1988-10-17
Document type
modifying order
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
Clayton Act s7; FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
industrial gases
Outcome
modified
Relief
other
Order term (years)
10
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

merger acquisition

Cite this decision

Liquid Air Corp. of North America, 111 F.T.C. 135 (1988). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v111-0005

Report an error in this record (decision id v111-0005)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF LIQUID AIR CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. AND L'AIR LIQVIDE SOCIETE ANONYME , ET AL.

MODIFYING ORDERS IN RBGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT AND SEC. 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT Docket G-2.990 3216. Gonsent Orders, Sept. , 1979 & July, 1987- Modifying Orders, Oct. , 1988 The Federal Trade Commission has reopened proceedings and modified consent orders (94 F. C. 390 & 110 F. C. 19), issued on Sept. 5, 1979 and on July 15 1987, by deleting the requirement that respondents obtain prior Commission approval as to internal reorganization activities. ORDER REOPENING AND MODIFYING ORDERS ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER 5 , 1979 , AGAINST LIQUID AIR CORPORATION OF NORTH AMEHlCA AND ON JULY 15 , 1987 , AGAINST ' AIR LIQUIDE SOCIETE ANONYME POUR L ETUDE ET EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE On June 20 , 1988, Liquid Air Corporation (formerly known as Liquid Air Corporation of North America) ("LAC" ) and its parent L' Air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L' Etude Et L'Exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude (" Air Liquide ), filed a "Request To Reopen Proceeding And Modify Orders In Docket No. C-2990 And In Docket No. C-3216" ("request"). The request was filed pursuant to Section 5(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U. C. 45(b), and Section 2.51 of the Commission s Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.51. The request asked the Commission to reopen the proceedings in Docket No. C-2990 and Docket No. C-3216 and modify the consent orders issued by the Commission on September 5, 1979, and July 15 1987 , in these respective matters. The respondents' request was placed on the public record for thirty days, pursuant to Section 2. 51 of the Commission s Rules. One comment was received. The complaint in Docket No. C-2990 was issued under Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U. C. 18 , and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 V. C. 45 , and alleged anticompetitive effects Modifying Order 111 F. T. arising from LAC' s acquisition of the Industrial Gases Division of Chemetron Corporation ("Chemetron ), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ). 1 The order in Allegheny Ludlum Industries, Inc. ("Allegheny Docket No. C-2990, which was issucd by the Commission on September 5, 1979, 94 FTC 390 (1979), among other things, prohibits the respondents in that matter, including LAC, for a ten-year period ending on September 20 , 1989, from acquiring without the prior approval of the Commission any United States air separation gases producer. Thc order defines "air separation gases producer" to mean a person who is engaged in both (1) the production, and (2) the distribution and sale of two or more of the air separation gases. " 2 94 TC at 396. The order s prior approval provision thus applies to among other things, intra-entity transactions involving LAC's possible acquisition of air separation gases producers which are owned and controlled by LAC or its parent. 3 The complaint in Docket No. C-3216 was also issued under Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U. C. 18, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 C. 45, and alleged anti competitive effects arising from L'Air Liquide s acquisition of the outstanding voting securities of Big Three Industries, Inc. ("Big Three ). The ordcr in Docket No. C-3216, which was issued by the Commission on July 15, 1987 , among other things prohibits L'Air Liquide, for a ten-year period ending on July 20, 1997 from acquiring without the prior approval of the Commission any United States merchant air separation gases producer. Paragraph 1.(7.) ofthe order defines "merchant air separation gases producer" to mean "any person that . is engaged in all of the following: (i) production, (ii) distribution and (iii) sale of two or more merchant air separation gases. " 4 The order s prior approval requirement in Docket No. C-3216 thus also applies to, among other things, intra-entity transactions involving L' Air Liquide s possible acquisition of mcrchant air separation gases producers which are owned and controlled by L'Air Liquide and/or LAC. 5 However, the order also provides that 1 Allegheny and Chemct.rod are also named rC1;pondents under the order in Docket No. C- 2990. Neither however, has asked the Commission to modify the order in t.his mauer. This order modifying the order issued on September 5 , 1979, in Docket No. (;-2990 applies only to respondent LAC. Air separation gases" is defined in the order to mean "oxygen, nitrogen and argon in gaseous or !iquid form, ur both." D4 FTC at 396.

3 The order in Docket No. C-2990 applies only to LAC "and all subsidiaries which it controls." 94 ITC at 396. LAC's parent, L'Air Liquidc, is thus not covered by the order. 4 " Merchant air eparation ga " is defined in paragraph 1.(6.) of the order to mean "oxygen, nitrogen and argon old in liquid form or packaged in cylinders. 5 The order in Docket No. C-3216 applies to L'Air Liquide and " aU subsidiaries it control See paragraph 111\ , 135 Modifying Order nothing in this order or in the Commission s order entered in Docket No. C-2990 shall require L' Air Liquide to obtain prior Commission approval if L'Air Liquide increases its ownership in (LAC) or causes Big Three to acquire (LAC)." See paragraph VII Air Liquide order. Both LAC and L'Air Liquide, under the orders in Dockets No. 2990 and C-3216, respectively, are required to obtain the prior approval of the Commission for a transaction in which L' Air Liquide causes LAC to acquire all or any part of Big Three. Section 5(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act provides that the Commission may modify an order when the Commission determines that the public interest so requires. Therefore, the Commission has invited respondents to show in petitions to reopen how the public interest warrants the requested modification. 16 CFR 2.51. In such a case, the respondent must demonstrate as a threshold matter some affirmative need to modify the order. Damon Corp. Docket No. C- 2916 , Letter to Joel E. Hoffman, Esq. (March 24 , 1984), at 2 Damon Letter ). For example, it may be in the public interest to modify an order "to relieve any impediment to effective competition that may result from the order. Damon Corp. 101 FTC 689, 692 (1983). Once such a showing of need is made, the Commission wil balance the reasons favoring the modification requested against any reasons not to make the modification. Damon Letter at 2. After reviewing the respondents' request, the Commission has determined that it is in the public interest to reopen the proceedings and modify the orders in Dockets No. C-2990 and C-3216. The respondents have shown that the prior approval requiremcnts of the orders impose substantial compliance costs on the respondents because they require the respondents to obtain the prior approval of the Commission in connection with the respondents' wholly internal activities. Such internal activities would raise no competitive questions and would not warrant prior approval review. The orders' prior approval provisions are also inconsistent with the principle that the coordinated activity of a parent and its whollyowned subsidiaries must be viewed as that of a single enterprise for Federal antitrust law purposes. See Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. 467 U.S. 752 (1984). Any internal corporate restructuring by L' Air Liquide is not likely to raise significant competitive consequences, and the Commission s orders in Docket Nos. C-3216 and C-2990 afford the Commission the opportunity to monitor the respondents' covered inter-entity merger activities. (j) Modifying Order 111 F.

Accordingly, it is ordered that these matters bc, and they are hereby, reopened and that the opening subparagraph (j) of the order in Docket No. C-2990 and paragraph 1.7. of the order in Docket No. 3216 be, and they are hereby, modified as follows: Docket No. C-2990 Air separation gases producer shall mean a person who is engaged in both (1) the production, and (2) the distribution and sale of two or more of the air separation gases, excluding, as to respondent Liquid Air Corporation, any individual, partnership, firm, corporation association, or any other business or legal entity, controlled by L' Air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'Etude Et L' Exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude. "Control" shall mean either (i) holding 50 percent or more of the outstanding voting securities of an issuer or (Ii) in the case of an entity that has no outstanding voting securities having the right to 50 percent or more of the profits of the entity, or having the right in the event of dissolution to 50 percent or more of the assets of the entity, or (iii) having the contractual power presently to designate 50 percent or more of the directors of a corporation, or in the case of unincorporated entities, of individuals exercising similar functions.

Docket No. C-3216 I. 7. Merchant air separation gases producer means any pcrson that is engaged in all of the following: (i) production, (ii) distribution and (iii) sale of two or more merchant air separation gases, excluding any individual, partnership, firm, corporation, association, or any other business or legal entity, controlled by L' Air Liquidc. Control" shall mean either (i) holding 50 percent or more of the outstanding voting securities of an issuer or (ii) in the case of an entity that has no outstanding voting securities, having the right to 50 percent or more of the profits of the entity, or having the right in the event of dissolution to 50 percent or more of the assets of the entity, or (iii) having the contractual power presently to designate 50 percent or more of the directors of a corporation, or in the case of unincorporated entities, of individuals exercising similar functions. 139 Complaint

← 111 F.T.C. 122 · 111 F.T.C. 139 →