Brog, Larry

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF LARRY BROG CONSENT ORDER, ETC. , IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 5 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-3174. Complaint, Dec. 1985-Decision, Dec. , 1985 This consent order requires a former chief executive offcer of a Salt Lake City, Utah manufacturer and distributor ofa dry milk substitute, among other things, to cease making any representations concerning the health benefits or expected shelf life for "Meadow Fresh White powdered, dairy-based milk substitute, or other food products, without reliable and competent substantiation. Also, respondent is prohibited from excluding some distributors in computing "average" distributor earnings without proper disclosures concerning the method of computation. Appearances For the Commission: Lawrence M. Hodapp. For the respondents: Cheryl 1. Jolley, Anderson Holland Salt Lake City, Utah.

COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Larry Brog, individually and as a former offcer of Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc., hereinafter sometimes referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Utah with its offce and principal place of business located in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Respondent Larry Brog was formerly Chief Executive Offcer of said corporation. He, among others, formulated, directed and controlled the acts and practices of said corporation, including the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. His address was the same as th",t of said corporation.

576 Complaint the manufacture, offering for sale, and sale offood products, including Meadow Fresh, a powdered, dairy-based drink, through a multilevel business opportunity.

PAR. 3. Respondent has caused to be prepared, published and disseminated advertising and promotional material, including, but not limited to, the promotional material referred to herein, to promote the sale of Meadow Fresh and membership in the Meadow Fresh multilevel business opportunity.

PAR. 4. Respondent has operated in various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia. Respondent's manufacturing, offering for sale, sale, and distribution of food products, including Meadow Fresh, constitutes maintenance of a substantial course of trade in or affecting commerce, as !Ccommerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act.

PAR. 5. In the course and conduct of his business, respondent has disseminated and caused the dissemination of advertisements and promotional material for food products, including Meadow Fresh, and for a multilevel business opportunity involving the sale of such food products, by various means in or affecting commerce, for the purpose of inducing and which were likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase of said products.

PAR. 6. Typical statements in said advertisements and promotional materials, disseminated as previously described, but not necessarily inclusive thereof, are the following:

(A) Contains over twenty times less "XQ"* than the whole version of the other product. *"XO" is xanthine oxidase, a major contributor to cardiovascular problems. (B) Meadow Fresh has an expected dry shelf life of 5 to 10 years. PAR. 7. Through the use ofthe statements referred to in Paragraphs Six (A) and Six (B), and other statements contained in other advertisements and promotional materials not specifically set forth herein respondent has represented, directly or by implication, that: (A) The use of Meadow Fresh is associated with a reduction in the incidence of cardiovascular disease due to reduced levels of xanthine oxidase.

(B) Xanthine oxidase is a major contributor to cardiovascular problems.

(C) Meadow Fresh has an expected storage life of5 to 10 years under reasonable storage conditions.

PAR. 8. Through the use ofthe statements referred to in Paragraphs Six (A) and Six (B), and other statements contained in other advertisements and promotional materials not specifically set forth herein respondent has represented, directly or by implication, that at the . . . + .. ,.. ...... .... Complaint 106 F.

time ofthe initial dissemination of the statements and of each subsequent dissemination, he possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis for the representations set forth in Paragraphs Seven (A) through Seven (C).

PAR. 9. In truth and in fact, at no time has respondent possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis for making the representations set forth in Paragraphs Seven (A) through Seven (C). Therefore, respondent's representation as set forth in Paragraph Eight was and is false and misleading.

PAR. 10. In the course and conduct of his business, respondent has disseminated, as previously described, promotional flipcharts upon which the current average monthly income of each level in the distributor hierarchy is to be entered. (A copy ofthis flpchart is attached to this complaint as Exhibit A.) These flipcharts are headed "CUR- RENT AVERAGE INCOMES FOR EACH BONUS LEVEL" and contain blanks following the terms "ADVISOR. . . .; COORDINATOR. ; MANAGER. . . .; AMBASSADOR. . . ." for income figures to be entered. These flpcharts have represented, directly or by implication that the income figures shown thereon reflect an average which is computed by taking into account the total number of distributors who have advanced to the specified bonus level and the amount of money earned by each of them during the month in question. PAR. 11. In truth and in fact, the income figures shown on the flipcharts do not reflect an average which is computed by taking into account the total number of distributors who have advanced to the specified bonus level and the amount of money earned by each ofthem during the month in question. Respondent provides distributors with monthly income figures for use on the flipchart which are computed by taking into account only those distributors who earn some income during the month in question, and the total amount of money earned by them. Because the large majority of distributors earn no income during a given month, this manner of computation results in average income figures which are substantially larger than would be the case if the figures were computed by the method set forth in Paragraph Ten. Therefore, respondent's representation as set forth in Paragraph Ten is false and misleading.

PAR. 12. The use by respondent of the aforesaid false, misleading and unfair statements and representations and the placement in the hands of others of the means and instrumentalities by and through which others may have used the aforesaid false, misleading and unfair statements and representations have had the capacity and tendency to mislead consumers into the erroneous and mistaken belief that said statements and representations were and are true and coml..i-.. n"" 1. ......,."'..'" +,. ..".... 1.",,,.. 1\trn....nnt _n"' 1- 576 Complaint become Meadow Fresh Farm distributors by reason of said erroneous and mistaken belief.

PAR. 13. The aforesaid acts or practices of respondent were and are to the prejudice and injury of the public and constituted and now constitute unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act as amended.

::

Complaint 106 F.

cO; 0 e Q) c.

.. 19 "0Q) =enc:0 en en c: en 0 c:

en u.

Q)"O .. c: t-. u. . ex :if 576 Decision and Order DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a copy ofa draft of complaint which the Bureau of Consumer Protection proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and The respondent, its attorney, and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission s Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondent has violated the said Act, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34 of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings and enters the following order:

1. Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Utah, with its offce and principal place of business located at 391 South Orange Street, in Salt Lake City, State of Utah. Proposed respondent Larry Brog is a former offcer of said corporation. He, among others, formulated, directed and controlled the policies, acts and practices of said corporation and his address was the same as that of said corporation.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

Decision and Order 106 F. ORDER It is ordered That respondent Larry Brog, individually and as a former offcer of Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc., and respondent' s agents representatives, and employees, directly or through any corporation subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with the manufacturing, advertising, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of a powdered, dairy-based drink called "Meadow Fresh" or any other food product in or affecting commerce, as ucommerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from representing, directly or by implication, unless at the time of such representation respondent possesses and relies upon reliable and competent scientific evidence that substantiates any such representation, (a) any benefit to health to be derived from using any such product, (b) any nutritional or other health related attribute of such product, or (c) any expected shelf life of such product. Reliable and competent shall mean for purposes of this order those tests, analyses, research, studies, or other evidence conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by persons qualified to do so, using procedures generally accepted in the profession or science to yield accurate and reliable results.

It is further ordered That respondent Larry Brog, individually and as a former offcer of Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc., and respondent's agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with the manufacturing, advertising, offering for sale, sale or distribution of any product or service in or affecting commerce, as "commerce " is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from representing as an "average " directly or by implication any computation of income levels, earnings, sales or other payments received by distributors as a whole or by a specified distributor category which is based on less than all distributors in the stated category, unless the fact that some distributors are excluded and the basis for any such exclusion are clearly and prominently disclosed in close proximity to such representation.

Distributor as used in this order shall refer to any person, partnership or corporation which is granted the right to offer, sell or distribute goods or services manufactured, processed, distributed, offered or 576 Decision and Order sold by respondent or to recruit other persons, partnerships or corporations to be distributors of respondent's goods or services. It is further ordered, That respondent shall, for at least three years after the date the representation is last disseminated, maintain and upon request make available to the Federal Trade Commission for inspection and copying copies of:

1. All materials relied upon to substantiate any representation covered by this order; and 2. All test reports, studies, surveys, or demonstrations in his possession or control, or of which he has knowledge, that contradict any representation covered by this order.

It is further ordered That respondent shall promptly notify the Commission of the discontinuance of his present business or employment and of his affliation with a new business or employment and that, for a period of four years from the date of service of this order respondent shall promptly notify the Commission of each affliation with a new business or employment, with each such notice to include the respondent's new business address and a statement of the nature of the business or employment in which the respondent is newly engaged, as well as a description of respondent's duties and responsibilities in connection with the business or employment. It is further ordered That respondent shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to all distributors of products manufactured or marketed by respondent.

It is further ordered That respondent shall, within sixty (60) days after service of this order, fie with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which he has complied with this order.

Complaint 106 F.