H & R Block, Inc
Volume 100 · 100 F.T.C. 523
Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.
Cite this decision
H & R Block, Inc, 100 F.T.C. 523 (1982). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v100-0027
Report an error in this record (decision id v100-0027)
Cited by 1 later FTC decisions
- U.S. PIONEER ELECTRONICS CORP cited_neutral
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF H & R BLOCK, INC.
MODIFYING ORDER IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 5 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Nov. , 1982 Docket C-2162. Consent Order, March 1972-Modifying Order, This order reopens the proceeding and modifies Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the Commission s order issued on March 1, 1972 (80 F. C. 304), by substituting a new paragraph 5, so as to make the order s provisions consistent with federal tax laws. Section 7216 of the Internal Revenue Code provides a comprehensive scheme for regulating the use by tax preparers of information obtained from customers, and the Commission believes that this scheme is adequate to prevent the misuse of confidential information by petitioner in the future. ORDER REOPENING THE PROCEEDING AND GRANTING REQUEST TO MODIFY ORDER On January 22, 1982, H & R Block Inc., the petitioner, filed a Request to Reopen Proceedings under Section 2.51 of the Commission s Rules of Practice. Block sought to set aside paragraphs 5 and 6 of a March 1, 1972, order against the company. On June 8, 1982 Block filed a Supplement to Modification of Request to Reopen Proceedings, seeking modification of the Order paragraphs instead of their elimination. The Order paragraphs prohibit Block from using information obtained from a customer for any purpose other than the preparation of tax returns unless, prior to obtaining any information from the customer, Block obtains the customer s written consent. The consent form used must disclose: (1) the exact information to be used, (2) the particular use to be made of such information (3) and a description of the parties or entities to whom the information may be made available.
The petitioner contends that enactment of Section 7216 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U. C. 7216, on December 10, 1971 effective January 1, 1972, and adoption by the Internal Revenue Service of regulations 301.7216-1 through 301.7216-3 on March 24 1974, constitute a change of the law warranting reopening the proceeding and modifying paragraphs 5 and 6 of the Commission Order. Regulation 301. 7216-3 reads in pertinent parts: Disclosure or use only with formal consent of taxpayer. (a) Written consent to use or disclosure--H) Solicitation of other business- (i If a tax return preparer has obtained from the taxpayer a consent described in paragraph (b) of this section, he may use the tax return information of such taxpayer to solicit from the taxpayer any additional current business, in matters not related to the Internal Revenue Service, which the Modifying Order 100 F.
tax return pre parker provides and offers to the public. The request for such consent may not be made later than the time the taxpayer receives his completed ta return from the tax return preparer. If the request is not granted, no follow up request may be made. This authoriztion to use ta return information of the taxpayer does not apply, however, for purposes of facilitating the solicitation of the tapayer s use of any services or facilities furnished by a person other than the tax return preparer, unless such other person and the tax return preparer are members of the same affliated group within the meaning of section 1504. Thus, for example, the authoriztion would not apply if the person is a corporation which is owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the same interests which own or control the tax return preparer but which is not affiiate with the tax return preparer within the meaning of section 1504(a). Moreover, this authorization does not apply for purposes of facilitating the solicitation of additional business to be furnished at some indefinite time in the future, as, for example, the future sale of mutual fund shares or life insurance, or the furnishing of future credit card services. It is not necessary, however, that the additional business be furnished in the same locality in which the tax return information is furnished.
(2) Permissible disclosures to third parties. If a tax return preparer has obtained from a taxpayer a consent described in paragraph (b) of this section, he may disclose the tax return information of such taxpayer to such third persons as the taxpayer may direct. However, see 301.7216-2 for certain permissible disclosures without formal written consent.
(b) Form of consent. A separate written consent, signed by the taxpayer or his duly authorized agent or fiduciary, must be obtained for each separate use or disclosure authorized in paragraph (a)(l), (2), or (3) of this section and shall contain- (1) The name of the tax return preparer (2) The name of the taxpayer (3) The purpose for which the consent is being furnished (4) The date on which such consent is signed (5) A statement that the tax return information may not be disclosed or used by the tax return preparer for any purpose (not otherwise permitted under 301.721&-2) other than that stated in the consent, and (6) A statement by the taxpayer, or his agent or fiduciary, that he consents to the disclosure or use of such information for the purpose described in subparagraph (3) of this paragraph.
The Commission has considered these developments and concluded that the public interest warrants its reopening the proceeding and modifying the order substantially as requested by petitioner. Section 7216 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder constitute a comprehensive scheme for regulating the use by tax preparers of information obtained from customers. The Commission believes that this scheme is adequate to prevent the misuse of confidential information by petitioner in the future. The additional requirements of the Commission s Order, which mandate more 523 Modifying Order disclosures and require that consent be obtained earlier from the customer, are not inconsistent with the regulatory scheme. However they do impose an additional burden on respondent that the Commission has concluded is unnecessary. Accordingly, It is ordered, That paragraphs 5 and 6 of the Order be modified by the substitution of the following new paragraph: 5. Using or disclosing any information concerning any customer of respondent, including the name and address of the customer obtained as a result of the preparation of the customer s tax return for any purpose which is not essential or necessary to the preparation of said tax return, except as specifically authorized by Section 7216 of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder or by future amendments thereto. Interlocutory Order 100 F.