Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Bristol-Myers Company

Volume 95 · 95 F.T.C. 263

Citation
95 F.T.C. 263
Docket
8917
Decision
1980-01-17
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
other
Outcome
other
Relief
other
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.

Cite this decision

Bristol-Myers Company, 95 F.T.C. 263 (1980). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v095-0008

Report an error in this record (decision id v095-0008)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE A TTER OF BRISTOL-MYERS COMPANY, ET AL.

Doket 8917. Interlouto Orr, Jan. 1980 ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT BRISTOL-MYERS' MOTION FOR ADDITION OF PORTION O:F Appendices TO BRIEF ON Appeal By motion dated January 7, 1980, respondent Bristol-Myers Company ("Bristol-Myers ) requests that the Commission accept 18 pages of appendices as part of its appeal brief in this proceeding. The 18 pages concerned here represent the amount by which Bristol-Myers' 77 page main appeal brief and 31 page booklet of appendices exceed the 90 page limit on appeal briefs set by the Commission in its Order Granting Leave to File Briefs in Excess of Sixty Pages, dated November 9, 1979. Bristol-Myers has already asked the Commission to reconsider its 90 page limit and to permit lengthier briefs. The Commission denied that request by order dated November 29, 1979. Thus, Brislol-Myers has long been on notice that the 90 page limit is firm. However, in its latest motion, Bristol-Myers provides no reason for exceeding that limit other than the difficulty of paring down its discussion of the case to the required length. Bristol-Myers' motion is therefore denied. The Commission is nevertheless willing to grant Bristol-Myers an additional period within which to edit its appendices or main appeal brief, or both, in such a manner that the combined fiing does not exceed ninety pages. If Bristol-Myers fails to submit a revised brief or revised appendices within that period, the Commission shah accept the first 13 pages of Appendix A 10 Bristol-Myers' appeal brief and shall reject the remainder of Appendix A and the entirety of Appendix B. To assure complaint counsel adequate opportunity to respond to any such revisions as Bristol-Myers may make, the remainder of the briefing schedule must be readjusted. Accordingly, It .is ordered That:

(1) Bristol-Myers' motion to have the fina118 pages of Appendices A and B accepted as part of its appeal brief is denied; (2) Bristol-Myers is granted leave until and including January 28 1980, in order to withdraw its main appeal brief and appendices and to revise them such that they total no more than 90 pages; (3) If no such revisions are submitted before January 28, 1980, the Secretary shall remove pages A 14 through B-ll of Appendices A and B to Bristol-Myers' main appeal brief before placing such appendices on the public record and transmitting them to the Commission; and (4) The briefing schedule shall be revised as follows: all answer Interlocutory Order 95 F. briefs shall be filed on or before March 17, 1980; and all reply briefs shall be filed on or before March 31, 1980. Commissioner Pitofsky did not participate.

265 Complaint

← 95 F.T.C. 246 · 95 F.T.C. 265 →