Cocoa-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc
Volume 92 · 92 F.T.C. 323
Cite this decision
Cocoa-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc, 92 F.T.C. 323 (1978). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v092-0017
Report an error in this record (decision id v092-0017)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. Docket 8992. Interlocutory Order, August 11, 1978 This order grants complaint counsel’s motion for reconsideration of a previous Commission denial of their request for an extension of time to file a brief. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION On August 9, 1978, Complaint Counsel filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Request for Eleven Day Extension of Time in Which to File Appeal Brief. Their initial request was denied on the ground that general allegations of burden are not sufficient for an extension of time.
Since complaint counsel’s Motion for Reconsideration now cites with specificity their obligations in. Beltone Electronics, Dkt. 8928 and Amway Corp., Dkt. 9023, that defect is cured. The Commission is aware of the time and work burdens associated with both cases and finds that those obligations are sufficient to justify this limited extension.
It is the Commission’s intention that the time limitations set forth in Rule 3.52 are to be maintained. General allegations of burden, without more, will not suffice for an extension of time. Furthermore, specificity alone.will not always carry the day. The Commission must be convinced that the burdens which counsel plead are genuine and not brought on by counsel’s own lack of diligence. Accordingly, It is ordered, That complaint counsel’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Request for Eleven Day Extension of Time in Which to File Appeal Brief be, and the same hereby is, granted, and complaint counsel are given to and including August 22, 1978, within which to file an appeal brief.
Modifying Order 92 FTC.