Warner-Lambert Company
Volume 92 · 92 F.T.C. 191
deceptive advertisinghealth claims
Cite this decision
Warner-Lambert Company, 92 F.T.C. 191 (1978). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v092-0006
Report an error in this record (decision id v092-0006)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
- 86 F.T.C. 1398 — MR. MARTINEZ OF MIAMI, INC., ET AL applied
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY MODIFIED ORDER, IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 8891. Final Order, Dec. 9, 1975 — Modified Order, July 20, 1978 This modified order to cease and desist is issued pursuant to a decision and judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, 562 F. 2d 749 (1977). The words “(c)ontrary to prior advertising” have been deleted from the disclosure statement required in Part III of the original order to cease and desist issued December 9, 1975, 41 FR 2381, 86 F.T.C. 1398. MopiFigED ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST Respondent, having filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit a petition for review of the Commission’s cease and desist order issued herein on December 9, 1975; and the Court having rendered its decision and judgment on August 2, 1977, affirming and enforcing the Commission’s order with modification of Part III; and the Supreme Court of the United States having denied on April 3, 1978, petitions for writs of certiorari filed by the parties:
Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, That the aforesaid order to cease and desist be, and it hereby is, modified in accordance with the decision and judgment of the Court of Appeals to read as follows: ORDER I It is ordered, That respondent Warner-Lambert Company, a corporation, its successors and assigns and respondent’s officers, agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with the labeling, advertising, offering for sale, sale or distribution of Listerine or any other non-prescription drug product in or affecting commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from: 1. Representing, directly or by implication, that any such product will cure colds or sore throats;
2. Representing, directly or by implication, that any such product will prevent colds or sore throats;
3. Representing, directly or by implication, that users of any such product will have fewer colds than non-users. Modified Order: 92 FTC.
Il It is further ordered, That respondent Warner-Lambert Company, a corporation, its successors and assigns and respondent’s officers, agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with the labeling, advertising, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of Listerine or any other mouthwash product in or affecting commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:
1. Representing, directly or by implication, that any such product is a treatment for, or will lessen the severity of, colds or sore throats; 2. Representing that any such product will have any significant beneficial effect on the symptoms of sore throats or any beneficial effect on symptoms of colds;
3. Representing that the ability of any such product to kill germs is of medical significance in the treatment of colds or sore throats or the symptoms of colds or sore throats.
Ill It is further ordered, That respondent Warner-Lambert Company, a corporation, its.successors and assigns, and respondent’s officers, agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, do forthwith cease and desist from disseminating or causing the dissemination of any advertisements for the product Listerine Antiseptic unless it is clearly and conspicuously disclosed in each such advertisement in the exact language below that:
Listerine. will not help prevent colds or sore throats or lessen their severity.
In print advertisements, the disclosure shall be displayed in type size which is at least the same size as that in which the principal portion of the text of the advertisement appears and shall be separated from the text so that it can be readily noticed. In television advertisements, the disclosure shall be presented simultaneously in both the audio and visual portions. During the audio portion of the disclosure in television and radio advertisements, no other sounds, including music, shall occur. Each such disclosure shall be presented in the language, e.g., English, Spanish, principally employed in the advertisement.
The aforesaid duty to disclose the corrective statement shall continue until respondent has expended on Listerine advertising a WARNER-LAMBERT CO. Lys 191 Modified Order sum equal to the average annual Listerine advertising budget for the period of April 1962 to March 1972.
IV It is further ordered, That the allegations of Paragraphs Nine and Ten of the complaint be, and they hereby are, dismissed. Vv It is further ordered, That respondent shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to each of its operating divisions. Jt is further ordered, That respondent notify the Commission at least thirty (80) days prior to any proposed change in its structure — such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of this order.
Jt is further ordered, That respondent shall, within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this order, file with the Commission a written report, setting forth in detail the manner and form of its compliance with this order.
Commissioner Pitofsky did not participate. Interlocutory Order 92 F.T.C.