Johnson Products Company, Inc
Volume 91 · 91 F.T.C. 506
deceptive advertisinghealth claimsproduct labeling
Cite this decision
Johnson Products Company, Inc, 91 F.T.C. 506 (1978). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v091-0015
Report an error in this record (decision id v091-0015)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
- 87 F.T.C. 206 — VIRGINIA MORTGAGE EXCHANGE, INC., ET AL discussed
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF JOHNSON PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC.
MODIFIED ORDER, IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SECS. 5 AND 12 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-2788. Complaint, Feb. 10, 1976 — Modified Order, Mar. 20, 1978 This order modifies a consent order issued February 10, 1976, 41 FR 11172, 87 F.T.C. 206, which was remanded to the Commission for reconsideration by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Modifications in the order exclude references to the advertising firm, restrict provisions of the order to hair straightening products, and are designed to eliminate the significant differences between the original order and that of a competitive company (Revlon, Inc.).
ORDER MopIFYING ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST On February 10, 1976 the Commission rejected an attempt by respondent Johnson Products Co., Inc. to withdraw from an executed consent order agreement and, on that date, the Commission entered a final cease and desist order. Thereafter, respondent petitioned the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit to review and set aside the order, contending, inter alia, that the Commission patently abused its discretion by refusing to permit respondent to withdraw from the consent agreement in the face of its claim that the Commission had engaged in an “unfair and arbitrary discrimination between similarly situated competitors. . .” (ie, Revlon, Inc. and respondent). The Court stayed enforcement of the order and remanded the matter to the Commission, noting the prospect that the proceeding might be reopened and modified to eliminate some or all of the critical disparities between the Revlon and Johnson orders. After extended negotiations, the parties executed an agreement, which will be treated as a petition to reopen this proceeding, containing an order to cease and desist. The modifications contained in this agreement substantially eliminate the significant differences between the Revlon and Johnson orders.
The Commission has duly considered the modifications encompassed in the agreement and has determined that the order should be so modified. Accordingly, It is ordered, That the proceeding be, and it hereby is, reopened. It is further ordered, That the order to cease and desist, as it applies to respondent Johnson Products Company, Inc., be, and it hereby is, modified by striking the section entitled “Order” and substituting therefor the following:
JOHNSON PRODUCTS CO., INC. 507 506 Modified Order ORDER I. It is ordered, That respondent Johnson Products Company, Inc., a corporation, its successors and assigns, and its officers, agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with the advertising, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of Ultra Sheen Creme Relaxer (Ultra Sheen Relaxer) or any hair care product in or affecting commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, do forthwith cease and desist from: A. Representing in writing, orally, visually, or in any other manner, directly or by implication, that: 1. Any hair straightening product is comfortable, gentle or safe.
2. Any hair straightening product is easy to use or to apply. 8. Any hair straightening product feels cool to skin or scalp. B. Representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, the efficacy of any hair straightening product or the ingredients therein, unless, at the time such representation is made, respondent has in its possession a reasonable basis, consisting of competent and reliable controlled tests to support such representation; or misrepresenting in any manner the nature of any such product or its ingredients or the effect of any such product or its ingredients on hair or skin or any other structure of the body.
C. Representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, the safety of any hair care product or the ingredients therein, unless at the time such representation is made, respondent has in its possession a reasonable basis, consisting of competent and reliable controlled tests, to support such representation. For purposes of this provision, failure to disclose facts shall not constitute a representation.
D. Disseminating or causing to be disseminated any advertisement of Ultra Sheen Relaxer or any hair straightening product of similar composition, which fails to disclose, clearly and conspicuously, with nothing to the contrary or in mitigation thereof, the following statement exactly as it appears below: WARNING: Follow directions carefully to avoid skin and scalp irritation, hair breakage and eye injury.
Il. It is further ordered, That respondent Johnson Products Company, Inc., a corporation, its successors and assigns, and its officers, agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection Modified Order 91 F.T.C.
with the advertising, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of Ultra Sheen Relaxer or any hair care product, do forthwith cease and desist from:
A. Disseminating or causing to be disseminated by United States mail or by any means in or having an effect upon commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, for the purpose of inducing or which is likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase of any such product, any advertisement which contains a representation prohibited by Paragraph I of this order or which omits a disclosure for such product required by Paragraph I of this order. B. Disseminating or causing to be disseminated by any means, for the purpose of inducing or which is likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase of any such product in or having an effect on commerce as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, any advertisement which contains a representation prohibited by Paragraph I of this order or which omits a disclosure for such product required by Paragraph I of this order. Ill. Jt is further ordered, That respondent Johnson Products Company, Inc., a corporation, its successors and assigns and its officers, agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device in connection with the offering for sale, sale, or distribution of Ultra Sheen Relaxer or any hair straightening product of similar composition in or affecting commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, do forthwith cease and desist from failing to include clearly and conspicuously on the information panel of the product package (i.e, the package containing the immediate container of the professional or home use hair straightening product), on the package insert, and on the label of the relaxer container of any such product, with nothing to the contrary or in mitigation thereof, the following disclosures exactly as they appear below:
WARNING:
1. This product contains sodium hydroxide (lye). You must follow directions carefully to avoid skin and scalp burns, hair loss, and eye injury. 2. Do not use if scalp is irritated or injured. 8. Do not use on bleached hair. Do not use on permanently colored hair which is breaking, splitting or otherwise damaged. For hair that has been permanently colored and shows no sign of damage, use only mild strength formula. 4. If you have previously relaxed your hair, relax only the new growth, as described in the directions.
5. Ifthe relaxer causes skin or scalp irritation, rinse out immediately and wash with shampoo in the kit. If irritation persists or if hair loss occurs, consult a physician. JOHNSON PRODUCTS CO., INC. 509 506 Modified Order 6. Ifthe relaxer gets into eyes, rinse immediately and consult a physician. Provided, however, that if such hair straightening product is offered for sale, sold or distributed without a neutralizing shampoo, respondent will disclose the following in place of Warning No. 5 above:
5. If the relaxer causes skin or scalp irritation, rinse out immediately and wash with a non-alkaline shampoo (ph below 7). If irritation persists, or if hair loss occurs, consult a physician.
Provided further, however, that respondent may use existing retail product packages, package inserts, and container labels if such packages, inserts and labels conform to the order entered in this matter on February 10, 1976.
IV. It is further ordered, That respondent shall distribute a copy of this order to its present and future officers, directors, and operating division and that respondent secure from each such person a signed statement acknowledging receipt of the order. V. It is further ordered, That respondent maintain complete business records relative to the manner and form of its continuing compliance with the terms and provisions of this order. Each record shall be retained by respondent for at least three years after it is made.
VI. It is further ordered, That respondent notify the Commission at least thirty days prior to any proposed change in respondent, such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation or corporations, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries, a change in the corporate name or address, or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of this order.
VII. Jt is further ordered, That the respondent herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service of this order, file with the Commission a written report setting forth in detail the manner and form of its compliance with this order; provided, however, that such compliance report need not contain materials or information previously submitted to the Commission to demonstrate compliance with the order entered in this matter on February 10, 1976. Complaint 91 F.T.C