Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

East Providence Credit Union

Volume 90 · 90 F.T.C. 319

Citation
90 F.T.C. 319
Docket
C-2906
Complaint
1977-10-27
Decision
1977-10-27
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5); Truth in Lending Act
Industry
Consumer credit
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; affirmative_disclosure; notice_to_customers; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
William P McDonough
Respondent counsel
Albert B West Providence, R.I
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

credit lending

Cite this decision

East Providence Credit Union, 90 F.T.C. 319 (1977). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v090-0037

Report an error in this record (decision id v090-0037)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF EAST PROVIDENCE CREDIT UNION CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND TRUTH IN LENDING ACTS Docket C-2906. Complaint, Oct. 977 Decision. Oct. 977 This consent order, among other things, requires an East Providence, R.I. credit union to cease failing to provide consumers, in connection with the extension of credit, such material and disclosures as are required by Federal Reserve Board regulations.

Appearances For the Commission: William P McDonough. For the respondent: Albert B West Providence, R.I. COMPLAINT ursuant to the provisions of the Truth in Lending Act and the implementing regulation promulgated thereunder, and the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that East Providence Credit Union, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Acts and the implementing regulation promulgated under the Truth in Lending Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent East Providence Credit Union is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, with its principal offce and place of business located at 15 Circle St., East Providence, Rhode Island. PAR. 2. Respondent is now, and for some time last past has been engaged in the business of lending money to the general public. PAR. 3. In the ordinary course and conduct of its business as aforesaid, respondent regularly extends, and for some time last past has regularly extended consumer credit, as "consumer credit" is defined in Regulation Z, the implementing regulation of the Truth in Lending Act, duly promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

PAR. 4. Subsequent to July 1 , 1969, respondent, in the ordinary course of its business, as aforesaid, has caused and is causing to be Complaint 90 F.

extended consumer credit, as "consumer credit" is defined in Regulation Z, and has caused and is causing customers to execute a binding promissory note secured by a first mortgage not for the purpose of acquiring a home and for second mortgages. Credit cost disclosures made in conjunction with the execution of the promissory note are contained on one side of a separate statement entitled, Consumer Credit Cost Disclosure Statement," hereinafter referred to as "Disclosure Statement.

By and through the use of the Disclosure Statement, respondent: 1. Failed to disclose the sum of payments scheduled to repay the indebtedness, using the term "total of payments" as required by Section 226.8(b) (3) of Regulation Z.

2. Failed to disclose the total amount of the finance charge, with descriptions of each amount included, using the term "finance charge," as required by Section 226.8(d) (3) of Regulation Z. 3. Failed to disclose a description of any penalty charge that may be imposed for prepayment of the principal of the obligation with an explanation of the method of computation of such penalty and the conditions under which it may be imposed, as required by Section 226.8(b)(6) of Regulation Z.

4. Failed to use the term "amount financed" to describe the amount of credit extended, including all charges, individually itemized, which are included in the amount of credit extended but which are not part of the finance charge, as required by Section 226.8(d) (1) of Regulation Z.

PAR. 5. By and through the use of promissory notes secured by first mortgages not for the purposes of acquiring a dwelling and by second mortgages the respondent retains, creates, or acquires a security interest, as "Security Interest" is defined in Section 226.2(gg) of Regulation Z, in real property which is used or expected to be used as the principal residence of the purchaser. Retention or acquisition of these security interests gives customers who are extended consumer credit as "Consumer Credit" is defined in Section 226. 2(p), of Regulation Z, the right to rescind the transaction until midnight of the third business day following the date of consummation of the transaction or the date of delivery of all disclosures required under this section and all other material disclosures required by Regulation , whichever is later, pursuant to Section 226.9(a) of Regulation Z. By and through the above-described acts and practices respondent has in many instances since July 1 , 1969: 1. Failed to furnish customers with two copies of a notice of the opportunity to rescind in the manner and form required by Section 226.9(b) of Regulation Z.

EAST PROVIDENCE CREDIT UNION 321 319 Decision and Order 2. Failed to set forth the "Effect of rescission " as set forth by Section 226. 9(d) of Regulation Z, in the manner and form required by Section 226.9(b) of Regulation Z.

PAR. 6. In the ordinary course of its business as aforesaid, respondent causes to be published advertisements as the term advertisement" is defined in Regulation Z. These advertisements aid, promote or assist, directly or indirectly, extensions of consumer credit.

By and through the use ofthe advertisements, respondent: States the amount of the loan, the number, amount, and period of payments scheduled to repay the indebtedness if the credit is extended, and the amount of the finance charge expressed as an annual percentage rate without also stating the following item in terminology prescribed under Section 226.8 of Regulation Z, as required by Section 226. l0(d)(2) of Regulation Z: The total of payments in the loan transaction. PAR. 7. Pursuant to Section 103(q) of the Truth in Lending Act, respondent' s aforesaid failures to comply with the provisions of Regulation Z constitute violations of that Act and, pursuant to Section 108 thereof, respondent has thereby violated the Federal Trade Commission Act.

DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Boston Regional Offce proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violation of the Truth in Lending Act and the implementing regulation promulgated thereunder and violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act; and The respondent and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of such agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission s Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondent has violated the said Acts, and that complaint should issue stating its ), 322 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIO:- DECISIONS Decision and Order gO F. charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34(b) of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues, its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order: 1. Respondent East Providence Credit Union is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations with its principal office and place of business located at 15 Circle St., East Providence, Rhode Island.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public in terest.

ORDER It is ordered, That respondent East Providence Credit Union, a corporation, its successors and assigns, and its officers, agents representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with any extension of consumer credit or advertisement to aid, promote or assist, directly or indirectly, any extension of consumer credit, as "consumer credit" and "advertisement" are defined in Regulation Z (12 C. R. 226) of the Truth in Lending Act (Pub. Law 90-321 15 U.sC. 1601 , et seq. forthwith cease and desist from:

1. Failing to disclose the sum of payments scheduled to repay the indebtedness, using the term "total of payments " as required by Section 226.8(b)(3) of Regulation Z.

2. Failing to disclose the total amount ofthe finance charge, with description of each amount included, using the term "finance charge," as required by Section 226.8(d)(3) of Regulation Z. 3. Failing to provide a description of any penalty charge that may be imposed for prepayment of the principal with an explanation of the method of computation of such penalty and the conditions under which it may be imposed, as required by Section 226. 8(b) (6) of Regulation Z.

4. Failing in any transaction in which respondent retains or acquires a security interest in real property which is used or expected to be used as the principal residence of the customer, to provide customers with two copies of the "Notice of Opportunity to Rescind" in the manner and form required by Section 226.9 of Regulation Z. 5. Failing to use the term "amount financed" to describe the amount of credit extended, including all charges. individually 319 Decision and Order itemized, which are included in the amount of credit extended but which are not part of the finance charge, as required by Section 226.8(d) (1) of Regulation z.

6. Representing in any advertisement, directly or by implication the amount of any installment payment, the dollar amount of any finance charge, the number of installments or the period of repayment, or that there is no charge for credit, unless all of the following items are clearly and conspicuously stated, in terminology prescribed under Section 226.8 of Regulation Z, as equired by Section 226. 10(d) (2) of Regulation Z:

(a) the amount ofthe loan;

(b) the number, amount and due dates or period of payments scheduled to repay the indebtedness if the credit is extended; (c) the amount of the finance charge expressed as an annual percentage rate; and (d) the total of payments.

7. Failing, in any consumer credit transaction or advertisement to make all disclosures determined in accordance with Sections 226.4 and 226.5 of Regulation Z at the time and in the manner, form and amount required by Sections 226. 6, 226. , 226. , and 226. 10 of Regulation Z.

It is further ordered That respondent deliver a copy of this order to cease and desist to all present and future personnel of respondent now or hereafter engaged in the consummation of any extension of Consumer credit or in any aspect of the preparation, creation, or placing of advertising, and that respondent secure a signed statement acknowledging receipt of said order from each said person. It is further ordered That respondent notify the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent, such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of the order. It is further ordered That the respondent herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, fie with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order.

Complaint 90 F.T.

← 90 F.T.C. 312 · 90 F.T.C. 324 →