Consumer Law Library

The Raymond Lee Organization, Inc

Volume 89 · 89 F.T.C. 208

Citation
89 F.T.C. 208
Docket
9045
Decision
1977-04-05
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
procedural
Industry
idea promotion
Outcome
other
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

The Raymond Lee Organization, Inc, 89 F.T.C. 208 (1977). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v089-0029

Report an error in this record (decision id v089-0029)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF THE RAYMOND LEE ORGANIZATION, INC., ET AL. Doket 9045. Interlocutory Order, Apr. 5. 1977 Order determing that record does not establish any violations of the code of professional responsibility.

ORDER The administrative law judge has certified to the Commission certain allegations made by respondents that complaint counsel and other Commission personnel have made improper statements concerning respondents and other members of the idea promotion industry. The Commission, of course, expects counsel appearing before this agency to comply with Disciplinary Rule 7-107 (H.' The Commission has determined that only the alleged comments made by counsel of record ought to be considered in the context of this adjudicative proceeding. The Commission has also determined that the record does not establish any violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

It is so ordered.

, The ruk provides that during the pendency of "nadministrative proceeding, a lawyer or law firm &;sociate therewith shall not m"ke or participat€ in making a SU)l.ment, other than a quotation from or reference to public remrds, that a reason"ble person would expect to be dissminated by means. of public communication if it is made uutside the official course of the proceeding and relates to: (1) Evidence reg"rding the occurrence or transaction involved. (2) The character, credibility, Or crimin"l record of a party, witness, or prospective witness. (3) Physical evidence or the performance or results of any examinations or tests Or the rdusal or failure ofa party to submit to such. (4) His opinion as toth" merits of the claims, defenses, or positions of "n interested pen;on. (5) Any other matter rea. on"b!y likely to interferewithafairhearing.

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. 209 209 Complaint

← 89 F.T.C. 207 · 89 F.T.C. 209 →