Consumer Law Library

Genesco Incorporated

Volume 89 · 89 F.T.C. 138

Citation
89 F.T.C. 138
Docket
9019
Decision
1977-02-24
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
other
Outcome
other
Relief
other
Commission counsel
Alan D. Reffkin, Justin Dingfelder and John F LeFevre
Respondent counsel
Sanford M Litvack, Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Genesco Incorporated, 89 F.T.C. 138 (1977). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v089-0017

Report an error in this record (decision id v089-0017)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF GENESCO INCORPORATED Doket 9019. Interlocutory Order, Feb. 2.4, 1977 Parties to fie brief memoranda in seven days as to whether they object to matter being withdrawn from adjudication while Commission considers their proposed order; respondent to advise whether it concurs in counsel supporting complaint' s recommendation for adoption of administrative law judge findings of fact, conclusions of law and order as modified by the parties. Appearances For the Commission: Alan D. Reffkin, Justin Dingfelder and John F LeFevre.

For the respondent: Sanford M Litvack, Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City.

ORDER On February 18, 1977, the Commission issued an order granting the parties' joint motion that their notices of intention to appeal from the initial decision be withdrawn and that further proceedings be stayed pending consideration by the Commission of the parties' proposed order. The Commission further indicated that the matter wil not be withdrawn from adjudication unless and until the Commission so orders.

The Commission requests the parties to file brief memoranda, not later than seven days after the date of this order, indicating whether they object to this matter being withdrawn from adjudication while the Commission considers their proposed order.! In addition, respondent is requested to advise whether it concurs in complaint counsel' recommendation "that the Commission adopt he Administrative Law Judge s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order as modified by the parties.

It is so ordered.

, If the case were withdrawn from adjudication, the Commission would be permitted to receive advice COflccrning the proposed order without regard to the reqllirements of Sed ion 4.7 ofthe Rllles of Pradice , Motion toSllpport Withdrawal of Notices of Appeal, p. :J. BIC PEN CORP., ET AL. 139 139 Complaint

← 89 F.T.C. 131 · 89 F.T.C. 139 →