Indian Arts & Crafts, Inc
Volume 88 · 88 F.T.C. 954
Cite this decision
Indian Arts & Crafts, Inc, 88 F.T.C. 954 (1976). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v088-0094
Report an error in this record (decision id v088-0094)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
In THE MATTER OF INDIAN ARTS & CRAFTS, INC., ET AL.
Docket 8965. Interlocutory Order, Dec. 14, 1976 Denial of respondents’ motion to correct official transcript of oral argument on appeal on grounds of mootness.
Appearances For the Commission: David R. Pender, Thomas C. Armitage, and Thornton P. Percival.
For the respondents: Carl Pruzan, Casey & Pruzan, Seattle, Washington, J. Richard Carr, Dempsey & Koplovitz, Washington, D.C. and David Shimek, Matthews, Dunn & Baily, Anchorage, Alaska. ORDER DENYING Motion To Correct OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF Oral ARGUMENT ON APPEAL By motion received October 26, 1976, respondents in Dkt. 8965 asked that the transcript of oral argument before the Commission on appeal be corrected in certain designated respects. Complaint counsel opposed this request by response received November 3. Since the proceedings have been dismissed there is no need to resolve this disagreement between the parties and accordingly the motion to correct the transcript will be denied on grounds of mootness. A copy of respondents’ motion will, however, as is customary, remain part of the public record of the case, thereby representing respondents’ recollection as to the substance of the oral argument. Therefore, It is ordered, That respondents’ motion to correct official transcript of oral argument on appeal be, and it hereby is, denied. THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS & GYNECOLOGISTS 955 955 Complaint