William R. Clark
Volume 88 · 88 F.T.C. 52
Cite this decision
William R. Clark, 88 F.T.C. 52 (1976). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v088-0006
Report an error in this record (decision id v088-0006)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
- 76 F.T.C. 207 — CLAlROL INCORPORATED cited_neutral
- 77 F.T.C. 1186 — DEJUR-AMSCO CORPORATION cited_neutral
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM R. CLARK MODIFYING ORDER IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 8761. Complaint, April 80, 196S—Modifying order, July 13, 1976 Order modifying an earlier order dated August 6, 1969, 34 F.R. 15348, 76 F.T.C. 207, modified September 1, 1970, 35 F.R. 15807, 77 F.T.C. 1186, by deleting Paragraph 16 of the order because provisions of the newly promulgated Trade Regulation Rule on the Preservation of Consumers’ Claims and Defenses supercedes it. Appearances For the Commission: Margery Waxman Smith. For the respondent: John W’. Norwood, Washington, D.C. ORDER MopIFYING ORDER To CEASE AND DESIST On June 17, 1976, respondent William R. Clark (Clark) by a paper entitled Motion to Modify Order Issued on August 6, 1969, and Modified on September 1, 1970, which will be treated as a petition to reopen this proceeding, has requested that Paragraph 16 be deleted from the order. The Bureau of Consumer Protection has filed an answer wherein it advises that it does not oppose Clark’s request. The Commission has determined that the request should be granted because the provisions of its newly promulgated Trade Regulation Rule on the Preservation of Consumers’ Claims and Defenses have superseded Paragraph 16 of this order.
It is ordered, That the proceeding be, and it hereby is, reopened. It is further ordered, That the order to cease and desist be, and it hereby is, modified by deleting Paragraph 16. FORD MOTOR CO. 58 58 Order