The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company Inc.

Volume 86 · 86 F.T.C. 1531

Citation: 86 F.T.C. 1531
Docket: 8866
Decision: 1975-12-19
Document type: interlocutory order
Case type: antitrust
Industry: grocery retail
Outcome: other
Relief: other
Commission counsel: John J. Mathias, Edwin R. Soeffing and Andrew G. Stone
Respondent counsel: Ira J. Dembrow, Cahill, Gordon, Sonnett Reindel Ohl New York City for The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. Sidley Austin Chicago, Ill. and Walter W. Kocher New York City for Borden, Inc
Source: Original volume PDF
Original PDF: This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company Inc., 86 F.T.C. 1531 (1975). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v086-0172

Report an error in this record (decision id v086-0172)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 4 later FTC decisions

GOLD BULLION INTERNATIONAL, LTD., ET AL applied
CLIFFDALE ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL applied
INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY cited_neutral
TELEBRANDS CORP., TV SAVINGS, LLC, AND AJIT KHUBANI cited_neutral

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATIER OF THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY INC., ET AL.

Docket 8866. Order, Dec. , 197, Granting of motion by A&P Company to file reply to complaint counsel's opposition to motion for leave to lodge documents in the record. Granting of motion by A&P Company for leave to lodge certain documents into the record.

Appearances For the Commission: John J. Mathias, Edwin R. Soeffing and Andrew G. Stone.

For the respondents: Ira J. Dembrow, Cahill, Gordon, Sonnett Reindel Ohl New York City for The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. Sidley Austin Chicago, Ill. and Walter W. Kocher New York City for Borden, Inc.

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST To FILE REPLY AND GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE To LODGE DOCUMENTS INTO RECORD Respondent The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company has filed a motion seeking leave to lodge in the record of this case two documents which were not entered during trial and which it claims are of relevance to the proceeding.

As a rule this is not a procedure of which we approve, since the time for presentation of evidence is at trial where it can be challenged by the other side and considered by the administrative law judge. Here however, it appears that only a small quantity of documentation is involved, the authenticity of the tendered exhibits is not questioned and their introduction wil not impede the orderly progress of this proceeding. While we intimate no view respecting the claims made by the parties as to the significance of these documents, we wil allow their lodging upon the record.

Therefore It is ordered That the request of respondent The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., for permission to file a reply to complaint plaint 86 F.

counsel's Opposition to Motion forLeave to Lodge be, and it hereby is granted.

It is further ordered That the motion of respondent The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., for leave to lodge certain documents into the record of this case be, and it hereby is, granted.