Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Magnetic Video Corporation

Volume 86 · 86 F.T.C. 1515

Citation
86 F.T.C. 1515
Docket
C-2767
Complaint
1975-12-12
Decision
1975-12-12
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
tape products manufacturing
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; affirmative_disclosure
Commission counsel
Paul K. Trause. 151(j FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertising

Cite this decision

Magnetic Video Corporation, 86 F.T.C. 1515 (1975). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v086-0165

Report an error in this record (decision id v086-0165)

Order status: dismissed_no_order. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF MAGNETIC VIDEO CORPORATION, ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-2767. Complainl, Dec. , 1975 Decision, Dec. 1975 Consent order requiring a Farmington Hills, Mich. , manufacturer and distributor of various tape products, including compilations of hits and sound alike recordings, among other things to cease using any advertisement or promotion­ al material which misrepresents that any tape product has been recorded by the original artist(s). Further, respondents must either disclose the name of the actual recording artist or print a warning advising prospective purchasers that the product "is not an original artist recording. Appearances For the Commission: Paul K. Trause.

151(j FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Complaint 86 F.T.

For the respondents: Charles Tat/wn, Mer,-U, Tathenl Rosati Detroit, Mich.

COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission having reason to believe that Magnetic Video Corporation, a corporation, and Andre Blay, individually and as an officer of said corporation, hereinafter sometimes referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. For the purposes of this proceeding, the following definitions shall apply:

Original Artist: The original artist is the person who originally recorded and made popular the song(s) or album in question, or with whom the public generally identifies the song(s) in question. Sound Alike Recording: A sound alike recording is a recording of a hit song(s) or a hit album recorded by one other than the original artist and performed in the style and manner of the original artist. Compilation of Hits: A compilation of hits is a tape product featuring a variety of songs originally recorded and made popular by various artists.

Tape Products: Tape products include tape cartridges or tape cassettes; or, insofar as Magnetic Video Corporation produces or distributes them, phonograph records.

PAR. 2. Respondent Magnetic Video Corporation is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the Laws of the State of Michigan, with its office and principal place of business located at 24380 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hils, Mich. Respondent Andre Blay is an individual and an officer of the corporate respondent. He formulates, directs, and controls the acts and practices of the corporate respondent, including the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. His address is the same as that of the corporate respondent.

PAR. 3. Respondents are now, and for some time last past have been engaged in the manufacture and distribution of various tape products including compilations of hits and sound alike recordings. PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of their business as aforesaid respondents now cause, and for sometime last past have caused, their products when sold to be shipped from their place of business located in the State of Michigan to purchasers thereof located in various other p:

1515 Final Order The aforesaid duty to disclose the corrective statement shall continue until respondent has expended on Listerine advertising a sum equal to ihp nTPY"1 nnn;:d Listerine advertising budget for he period of April 1962 to March 1972. .

PART IV It is further ordered That the allegations of Paragraphs Nine and Ten of the complaint be, and they hereby are dismissed. PART V It is further ordered That respondent shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to each of its Ot tlnIT rlivisions- It is further ordered That respc.IIUt'HL JlULUY LHe vI thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in its structure such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out ofthis order.

It is further ordered That respondent shall, within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this order, fie with the Commission a written report, setting forth in detail the manner and form of its compliance with this order.

← 86 F.T.C. 1398 · 86 F.T.C. 1515 →