Kennecott Copper Corporation

Volume 86 · 86 F.T.C. 1105

Citation: 86 F.T.C. 1105
Docket: 8765
Decision: 1975-11-18
Document type: petition ruling
Case type: antitrust
Industry: copper mining
Outcome: other
Commission counsel: Harold E. Kirtz, Karen G. Bokat and Charles W. Corddry, III
Respondent counsel: Michael J. Henke, Vinson, Elkins, Searls Connolly Sm.ith Wash., D
Source: Original volume PDF
Original PDF: This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Kennecott Copper Corporation, 86 F.T.C. 1105 (1975). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v086-0141

Report an error in this record (decision id v086-0141)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 5 later FTC decisions

LEONARD F. PORTER, INC., ET AL. — Docker 8964 INDIAN ARTS & CRAFTS, INC., ET AL. — Docker 8965 J.L. HOUSTON, INC. ET AL. — Docker 8966 discussed
JAY NORRIS CORP., ET AL cited_neutral
KOSCOT INTERPLANETARY, INC., ET AL cited_neutral
THE RAYMOND LEE ORGANIZATION, INC., ET AL discussed
HARBOUR GROUP INVESTMENTS, L.P cited_neutral

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF' KENNECOTT COPPER CORPORATION Docket 8765. Onler, NOl!. , 197.

Denial of petition to reopen proceeding to enlarge time for compliance. Appeamnces For the Commission: Fiodie P. Favarella and Joseph Eckha-us. For the respondent: John L. Warden, Sullivan Cromwell New York City and John Bodner, Jr. and Francis A. O'Brien, Howery, Simon, Baker Murchison Wash., D.

ORDER DENYING PETITION TO REOPEN THE PROCEEDING To ENLARGE THE TIME FOR COMPLIANCE On Oct. 14, 1975, respondent Kennecott Copper Corporation filed a Petition To Reopen the Proceeding To Enlarge the Time for Compliance." By answer dated Nov. 10, 1975, the Bureau of Competition has opposed the petition.

The Commission is of the view that respondent's petition to reopen is not a proper vehicle for seeking an extension of time within which to comply with an order, and has determined to deny the petition, for the reasons elaborated in its order of May 5 1975 (85 F. C. 848), denying a similar petition to reopen these proceedings to enlarge the time for compliance.

The Commission wil consider separately respondent' s request, filed simultaneously pursuant to Section 4.3(b) of the rules of practice, for an extension of time within which to comply with the order to cease and desist in this matter. Therefore It is ordered That the "Petition To Reopen the Proceeding To Enlarge the Time for Compliance" be, and it hereby is, denied. IN THE MATTER OF AMERICAN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY Docket 88.47. Order, No-v. , 197.5 Denial of motion by respondent and intervenor for reconsideration of 1972 order vacating administrative law judge s initial decision and remanding case for further proceedings.

IIO(j FED,:RAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Complaint H(j F. Appearances For the Commission: Harold E. Kirtz, Karen G. Bokat and Charles W. Corddry, III.

For the respondent: Michael J. Henke, Vinson, Elkins, Searls Connolly Sm.ith Wash., D.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR Reconsideration Respondent American General I insurance Company and intervenor Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland move for reconsideration of an order by the Commission, dated Dec. 5, 1972 (81 F. C. 10521, vacating the administrative law judge s initial decision and remanding the case for further proceedings. The administrative law judge filed an initial decision sustaining the complaint in this matter on Aug. 7, 1975. Respondent and intervenor have failed to make a sufficient showing why the Commission should grant their motion for reconsideration especially after the lapse of almost three years from the date issuance of the order they seek to challenge. Accordingly, It is ordered That the aforesaid motion for reconsideration be, and it hereby is, denied.