Litton Industries, Inc

Volume 86 · 86 F.T.C. 589

Citation: 86 F.T.C. 589
Docket: 8778
Decision: 1975-09-03
Document type: modifying order
Case type: antitrust
Outcome: modified
Relief: compliance_reporting
Commission counsel: Harold G. Munter, Lois E. Berge, Laurence Masson and Joseph J. O'Malley
Respondent counsel: Theodore F. Craver Beverly Hils, Calif. Howrey, Simon, Baker Murchison Wash. C. and Hammond Schrieber New York City
Source: Original volume PDF
Original PDF: This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Litton Industries, Inc, 86 F.T.C. 589 (1975). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v086-0067

Report an error in this record (decision id v086-0067)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF LITTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

MODIFYING ORDER, IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT Docket 8778. Substitute Order, Mar. 4, 1975-Modified Order, Sept. , 1975 Order modifying a substitute order dated March 4 1975, &5 F. C. 3a2, 40 F. R. 18989 by striking the compliance paragraph requiring the filing of reports every sixty (60) days and substituting a new compliance paragraph requiring the filing of compliance reports on an annual basis after finality of the order. Appearances For the Commission: Harold G. Munter, Lois E. Berge, Laurence Masson and Joseph J. O'Malley.

For the respondents: Theodore F. Craver Beverly Hils, Calif. Howrey, Simon, Baker Murchison Wash. C. and Hammond Schrieber New York City.

ORDER MODIFYING ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST Respondent, by letter dated July 25, 1975, which will be treated as a petition to reopen this proceeding, has requested that the requirement that it fie compliance reports at 60-day intervals, contained in the order to cease and desist issued Mar. 4, 1975, be modified so as to require only annual reports. The Bureau of Competition has filed an answer wherein it advises that it does not oppose respondent' s request. The Commission has duly considered respondent's request and has determined that it should be granted.

It is ordered That the proceeding be, and it hereby is, reopened. It is further ordered That the order to cease and desist be, and it hereby is, modified by striking the compliance paragraph and substituting therefor the following:

It is further ordered That respondent shall, within 60 days after the date of service of this order, and on the anniversary of the date of finality of the order thereafter, unti respondent shall have fully complied with the provisions of this order, submit, in wrting, to the Federal Trade Commission a report setting forth in detail the manner and form in which respondent intends to comply, is complying, or has complied with this order.

Complaint 86 FTC.

← 86 F.T.C. 585 · 86 F.T.C. 590 →