Consumer Law Library

Standard Oil Company

Volume 86 · 86 F.T.C. 196

Citation
86 F.T.C. 196
Docket
C-2684
Complaint
1975-07-17
Decision
1975-07-17
Document type
consent order
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
crude petroleum and natural gas
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist
Commission counsel
BaIT L. Malter
Respondent counsel
RichaTd M. Donatdson Cleveland, Ohio
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Standard Oil Company, 86 F.T.C. 196 (1975). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v086-0012

Report an error in this record (decision id v086-0012)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION Of' THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT AND SEC. 8 OF THE CLAYTON ACT Docket C-2684, Com.plaiul., July 197.5-Decisioll .July, 1.975 Consent order requiring a Cleveland, Ohio, energy company, among other things to cease permitting any individual to serve on its board of directors if such individual is or would be at the same time a director of Diamond Shamrock Corporation, Appearances For the Commission: Bait L. Malter.

For the respondent: Richard M. Donatdson Cleveland, Ohio. COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that the above-named respondents have violated the provisions of Section 8 of the Clayton Act, as amended, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, and that a proceeding in respect thereof would be in the interest of the public, issues this complaint, stating its charges as follows:

PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent The Standard Oil Company (hereinafter referred to as Sohio) is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Ohio, maintaining its principal place of business at 101 W. Prospect Ave., Cleveland, Ohio. At all times relevant to this complaint, Sohio had capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating in excess of $1 milion. In 1972, Sohio had sales and operating revenues of $1 116 636 000.

PAR. 2. Respondent Diamond Shamrock Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Diamond Shamrock) is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware maintaining its principal place of business at 1100 Superior Ave. Cleveland, Ohio. At all times relevant to this complaint, Diamond 19(j Decision and Order Shamrock had capital, surplus and undivided profits aggregating in excess of $1 millon. In 1972 Diamond Shamrock had sales and operating revenues of $617 337 000.

PAR. 3. In 1974, and previously thereto, MI'. Horace A. Shepard served simultaneously as a director of Sohio and Diamond Shamrock. Mr. Shepard resigned from the board of directors of Diamond Shamrock on July 26, 1974, after having been notified of the Commission s intention to issue a complaint in this matter. P AI! 4. (a) The business of Sohio and Diamond Shamrock encompasses, but is not limited to, the exploration, production and sale of crude petroleum and natural gas.

(b) Respondents engage in the aforesaid activities in the same geographic areas of the United States including, but not limited to Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas and Wyoming.

PAR. 5. (a) Sohio and Diamond Shamrock have been and are, by virtue of their business and location of operations, competitors of each other.

(b) The elimination of competition by agreement or otherwise between Sohio and Diamond Shamrock would hinder, foreclose, and restrain competition or tend to create a monopoly in the exploration production, and sale of crude petroleum and natural gas, (c) Sohio and Diamond Shamrock each engages in commerce as that term is defined in the Clayton Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act.

P AI! 6. The director interlock, as herein alleged, constitutes a violation of Section 8 of the Clayton Act and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

DECISION ANO ORDER The Commission having heretofore determined to issue its complaint charging the respondent named in the caption hereto with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the respondent having been served with notice of said determination and with a copy of the complaint the Commission intended to issue, together with a proposed form of order; ancl The respondent and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the complaint to issue herein, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission rules; and lY:- FEDERAL TRADE CO:vMISSION DECISIOKS Dpeision and Ode!" SG F.

The Commission having considered the agreement and having provisionally accepted mme, and the agreement containing consent order having thereupon been placed on the public record for a period of sixty (GO) days, and having duly considered the comment filed thereafter pursuant to Section 2.:J(b) of its rules, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.:4(b) of its rules the Commission hereby issues its complaint, in the form contemplated by said agreement, makes the following jurisdictional finding, and enters the following urder:

1. Respondent, The Standard Oil Company is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of t.he State of Ohio, with its office and principal place of business located at 101 W. Prospect Ave., Cleveland, Ohio. 2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered That The Standard Oil Company, an Ohio corporation (Sohio), its successors and assigns, do forthwith cease and desist from permitting any individual to serve on its hoard of directors if such individual is ur would be at the same time a director of Diamond Shamrock Corporation.

It is further ordered That Sohio shall, within thirty days after service of this order, and annually for a period ending five (5) years thereafter, request from each member of its board of directors a written statement which discloses the name, business, and location of operations of each other corporation of which such member is also a director, exclusive of The British Petroleum Company Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation, and any corporation in which Sohio or The British Petroleum Company Limited controls, directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, more than 50 percent of the voting stock; exclusive of any corporation which derives annual gross revenues of Jess than $1 milion from the exploration, production, and sale of natural gas and crude petroleum and exclusive of any corporatiun not engaged in "commerce" as defined in Section 1 of the Clayton Act as amended or Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. STANDARD OIL CO. 199 19(j Decision and Order It is further ordered That for a period ending five (5) years after service of this order, Sohio shall, at least thirty (30) days prior to any directors' meeting at which one or more directors wi1 be elected or the mailing of proxy statements for any shareholder meeting at which one or more directors wil be elected, request from each person who is being considered as a member of its board of directors, but has not been a member of the board of directors during the previous year, a written statement which discloses the information described in Paragraph II.

It is farther ordered That for a period ending five (5) years after service of this order, Sohio shall not permit on its board of directors any individual who fails to submit a written statement pursuant to Paragraphs II and III, or any person who is a director of another corporation named in response to the statements required pursuant to Paragraphs II and II I when said statement reveals or when a reasonably diligent investigation would reveal to respondent that such other corporation is a competitor of Sohio by virtue of its business and location of operations in the exploration, production, or sale of crude petroleum or natural gas. If compliance with Paragraphs I and IV requires any member of Sohio s board of directors to resign or to be removed from the board of directors of Sohio or such other corporation Sohio shall be allowed a reasonable period of time within which too take any legal or other steps which are necessary to secure compliance with this order. For purposes of this order, Sohio, The British Petroleum Company Limited and any corporation which Sohio or The British Petroleum Company Limited controls, directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, more than 50 percent of the voting stock shall not be considered competitors.

It is f"rther ordered That Sohio notify the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent such which may affect compliance obligations arising out of this order, changes to include, but not be limited to, dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation. It is farther ordered That respondent Sohio shall, within thirty (30) FI':O,;RAL TRADE COMMISSION Decisions Complaint fig FTC. days after service upon it of this order, fie with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order, and shall within sixty (60) days submit copies of those lists provided by all current directors of Sohio pursuant to Paragraphs II and III designating all other corporations of which they are directors.

← 86 F.T.C. 182 · 86 F.T.C. 200 →