Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Hercules Incorporated

Volume 84 · 84 F.T.C. 605

Citation
84 F.T.C. 605
Docket
C-2558
Complaint
1974-10-04
Decision
1974-10-04
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5)
Industry
insecticide manufacturing
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; affirmative_disclosure; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
Miriam A. Bender, Eric M. Rubin and Paul L. Chassy
Respondent counsel
Charles S. Maddock, Wilmington, Del., and Bur- ton Caine of Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, Phila, Pa
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingenvironmental claims

Cite this decision

Hercules Incorporated, 84 F.T.C. 605 (1974). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v084-0067

Report an error in this record (decision id v084-0067)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF HERCULES, INCORPORATED CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-2558. Complaint, Oct. 4, 1974—Decision, Oct. 4, 1974 Consent order requiring a Wilmington, Del., formulator and distributor of manufacturing grade insecticides, among other things to cease claiming that its agricultural insecticides are absolutely safe to use or absolutely safe to man or the environment. Further, respondent must place in all promotional material expressing or implying safety claims about agricultural insecticides, a statement reminding users that all pesticides are harmful if misused, and that they should only be used as directed. Appearances For the Commission: Miriam A. Bender, Eric M. Rubin and Paul L. Chassy.

For the respondent: Charles S. Maddock, Wilmington, Del., and Burton Caine of Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, Phila, Pa. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Hercules Incorporated, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated provi- PAARL UY LID LIN se UVvYV 605 Complaint dent responsible for the advertising, promotion, distribution or sale of such products.

XII. It is further ordered, That the respondent notify the Commission at least thirty (80) days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent such as dissolution, assignment or sale, resulting in the emergence of a.successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other changes in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of this order. XII. It is further ordered, That respondent corporation shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order, except that such report shall in the case of Sections LB., I.C., I1.B., II.C., and III be filed within sixty (60) days after their becoming effective against respondent corporation.

← 84 F.T.C. 591 · 84 F.T.C. 605 →