Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Leonard F. Porter, Inc., et al.; Indian Arts & Crafts, Inc., et al.

Volume 84 · 84 F.T.C. 419

Citation
84 F.T.C. 419
Docket
8964
Decision
1974-09-11
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
procedural
Outcome
other
Relief
other
Commission counsel
David R. Pender, Michael A. Katz and Thornton P. Percival
Respondent counsel
Carl Pruzan,.of Casey & Pruzan, Seattle, Wash
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Leonard F. Porter, Inc., et al.; Indian Arts & Crafts, Inc., et al., 84 F.T.C. 419 (1974). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v084-0042

Report an error in this record (decision id v084-0042)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTERS OF LEONARD F. PORTER, INC., ET AL.—DOCKET 8964 INDIAN ARTS & CRAFTS, INC., ET AL.—DOCKET 8965 J.L. HOUSTON, INC., ET AL.—DOCKET 8966 WESTERN NOVELTY CO., ET AL.—DOCKET 8967 HERMAN KRUPP, TRADING AS OCEANIC TRADING COMPANY Y— DOCKET 8968 HEINZ LANGE, TRADING aS NORTHWEST ARTS AND CRAFTS—DOCKET 8969 Interlocutory Order, Sept. 11, 1974 Order denying motion of complaint counsel to amend Rule 4.2(c). However, requirements of rule waived to extent that not more than 20 copies of notice of intention to appeal and of briefs before the Commission need be filed and no more than 10 copies of all other documents except notices of appearances and reports of compliance. Complaint 84 F.T.C.

Appearances _ For the Commission: David R. Pender, Michael A. Katz and Thornton P. Percival.

For the respondents: Carl Pruzan,.of Casey & Pruzan, Seattle, Wash.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND RULES OF PRACTICE AND LIMITING NUMBER COPIES OF DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED By order of Aug. 30, 1974, the administrative law judge certified to the Commission the motion of complaint counsel in Leonard F. Porter, Inc., et al., that Section 4.2(c) of the Rules of Practice be amended by lessening the number of copies of documents required for filings under that section. While it would be inappropriate to modify a rule of general applicability on the basis of the particular facts of a single case or group of cases, it has been determined that a lesser number of copies will suffice in the Porter matter and the other captioned cases here. Accordingly, .

It ts ordered, That the motion to amend Rule 4.2(c) be, and it hereby is, denied.

It is further ordered, That the requirements of this rule be, and they hereby are, waived in these matters to the extent that no more than twenty (20) copies of a notice of intention to appeal and of briefs before the Commission need be filed, and that no more than ten (10) copies of all other documents will be required except for notices of appearances and reports of compliance, as to which only two (2) copies are required to be filed.

← 84 F.T.C. 414 · 84 F.T.C. 420 →