International Service Industries, Inc
Volume 84 · 84 F.T.C. 408
deceptive advertisingpricing comparisons
Cite this decision
International Service Industries, Inc, 84 F.T.C. 408 (1974). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v084-0039
Report an error in this record (decision id v084-0039)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF INTERNATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-2539. Complaint, Sept. 5, 1974—Decision, Sept. 5, 1974 Consent order requiring a Downey, Calif., operator of physical fitness and/or health salons, among other things to cease misrepresenting its promotional sales plans, services as free, limited offers, savings which purchasers may achieve, and guarantees.
Appearances For the Commission: William M. Rice, Jr.
For the respondents: Raymond Jackson, Beverly Hills, Calif., Kevin J. Quinn, Refkind & Sterling, Beverly Hills, Calif. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that International Service Industries, Inc., a corporation, and Sidney Craig and Allen Bergendahl, individually and as officers of said corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in’ that respect as follows:
PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent International Service Industries, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Utah, with its principal office and place of business located at 9132 East Stonewood Street, in the city of Downey, State of California.
Respondent Sidney Craig is an individual and an officer of the corporate respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the acts and practices of the corporate respondent, including the acts and practices Complaint; 84 F.T.C.
after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with the order to cease and desist contained herein.