Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

George Dugan Chevrolet

Volume 84 · 84 F.T.C. 215

Citation
84 F.T.C. 215
Docket
C-2525
Complaint
1974-07-30
Decision
1974-07-30
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
Truth in Lending Act
Industry
automobile dealer
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; affirmative_disclosure; compliance_reporting
Commission counsel
Michael A. Katz, Stephen A. Kikuchi and Thornton P. Percival
Respondent counsel
Robert D. Boivin, Klamath Falls, Oreg. 575-956 O-LT - 76 - 15 215 Complaint Such advertisement shall be run no later than sixty (60) days after service upon respondents of this order. It is further ordered, That respondents cease and desist from repre- senting, directly or indirectly, in their advertising, promotional material, package label, or any other similar material that their vitamin, mineral, or vitamin and mineral products have “super potency,” and from using
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

credit lendingdeceptive advertising

Cite this decision

George Dugan Chevrolet, 84 F.T.C. 215 (1974). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v084-0015

Report an error in this record (decision id v084-0015)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE V. DUGAN D/B/A GEORGE DUGAN CHEVROLET CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND TRUTH IN LENDING ACTS Docket C-25235. Complaint, July 30, 1974—Decision, July 30, 1974 Consent order requiring a Klamath Falls, Oreg., new and used automobile dealer, among other things to cease violating the Truth in Lending Act by failing to disclose to consumers, in connection with the extension of credit, such information as required by Regulation Z of the said Act.

Appearances For the Commission: Michael A. Katz, Stephen A. Kikuchi and Thornton P. Percival.

For the respondent: Robert D. Boivin, Klamath Falls, Oreg. 575-956 O-LT - 76 - 15 215 Complaint Such advertisement shall be run no later than sixty (60) days after service upon respondents of this order.

It is further ordered, That respondents cease and desist from representing, directly or indirectly, in their advertising, promotional material, package label, or any other similar material that their vitamin, mineral, or vitamin and mineral products have “super potency,” and from using the word “super” or any word of similar import or meaning as a part of the trade name of their vitamin, mineral, or vitamin and mineral products.

It 1s further ordered, That respondents notify the Commission at least thirty (80) days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries, or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of the order.

It is further ordered, That the individual respondents named herein promptly notify the Commission of the discontinuance of their present business or employment and of their affiliation with a new business or employment. Such notice shall include respondents’ current business address and a statement as to the business or employment in which they are engaged as well as a description of their duties and responsibilities. It is further ordered, That the respondents herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a written report setting forth in detail the manner and form of their compliance with this order.

← 84 F.T.C. 209 · 84 F.T.C. 215 →