Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Holiday Magic, Inc

Volume 83 · 83 F.T.C. 1590

Citation
83 F.T.C. 1590
Docket
8834
Decision
1974-04-29
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
consumer protection
Outcome
other
Relief
other
Commission counsel
Joseph S. Brownman and Stuart D. Cameron
Respondent counsel
Stein, Mitchell & Mezines, Wash., D.C
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Cite this decision

Holiday Magic, Inc, 83 F.T.C. 1590 (1974). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v083-0162

Report an error in this record (decision id v083-0162)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF HOLIDAY MAGIC, INC., ET AL.

Docket 8834. Interlocutory Order, Apr. 29, 1974 _ Order granting 30-day extension within which to submit additional information and views, with answer by complaint counsel due 15 days following respondents’ submission. Appearances For the Commission: Joseph S. Brownman and Stuart D. Cameron. For the respondents: Stein, Mitchell & Mezines, Wash., D.C. ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND VIEWS Respondents have petitioned the Commission, by motion dated Apr. 24, 1974, for a thirty-day extension of time in which to submit additional information and views pertaining to the relationship of certain orders of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to the disposition of this matter.

In view of the complexity of this matter, the desirability that it be thoroughly evaluated by counsel, and inasmuch as the requested extension is not likely to delay final disposition of this case, the requested extension of time will be granted. The Commission specifically invites counsel for respondents, in the course of his submission, to assume arguendo that the findings of violations of law recommended by the administrative law judge are affirmed, and suggest in that regard specific alternative order provisions in those instances in which it is felt that order provisions recommended by the administrative law judge go beyond what is necessary to eliminate the violations of law found by the administrative law judge, and would serve to impede the future operation of corporate respondent in a lawful fashion. The answer of complaint counsel to respondents’ submission shall continue to be due fifteen days following filing of the submission. Therefore, It is ordered, That respondents be, and they hereby are, granted an extension of thirty days within which to submit additional information WAAUIN UUIVE., dud AL. VUE 1591 Order and views pursuant to Section 3.54(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Procedures, such views to be submitted no later than May 24, 1974.

← 83 F.T.C. 1587 · 83 F.T.C. 1591 →