Consumer Law Library

Food Fair Stores, Inc.

Volume 83 · 83 F.T.C. 1213

Citation
83 F.T.C. 1213
Docket
8786
Complaint
1969-07-10
Decision
1974-01-22
Document type
dismissal
Case type
antitrust
Industry
food industry
Outcome
dismissed
Commission counsel
Francis C. Mayer, James C. Donoghue, Martin A. Rosen, Lewis F. Parker, Louis R. Sernoff and Eliot G. Disner
Respondent counsel
Shipley, Akerman, Stein & Kaps, Wash., D.C. and Stein & Rosen, New York, N.Y. for Food Fair Stores, Inc. and World-Wide Produce Co., Inc. Subin, Shams & Rosenbluth, Orlando, Fla. for Hallee-Boy Sales, Inc. and Ivin Arost. Collier, Shannon, Rill & Edwards, Wash., D.C. for John P. Storm, a corporation
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

price discrimination

Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.

Cite this decision

Food Fair Stores, Inc., 83 F.T.C. 1213 (1974). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v083-0108

Report an error in this record (decision id v083-0108)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF FOOD FAIR STORES, INC., ET AL. D. 8786 H. C. BOHACK Coo., INC., ET AL. D. 8787 JEWEL COMPANIES, INC., ET AL. D. 8788 BORMAN FOOD STORES, INC. D. 8789"

FIRST NATIONAL STORES, INC., ET AL. D. 8790 ORDER OF DISMISSAL, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SEC. 2(C) OF THE CLAYTON ACT Complaints, July 10, 1969—Decisions, Jan. 22, 1974 Orders dismissing the complaints issued against 10 corporations and certain individual officers thereof, engaged in various aspects of the food industry for alleged violations of Sec. 2(c) of the Clayton Act on the basis that the evidence relied upon by complaint counsel would not support the charges that respondent had violated See. 2(c) of the Clayton Act, amended.

Appearances For the Commission: Francis C. Mayer, James C. Donoghue, Martin A. Rosen, Lewis F. Parker, Louis R. Sernoff and Eliot G. Disner. For respondents: Shipley, Akerman, Stein & Kaps, Wash., D.C. and Stein & Rosen, New York, N.Y. for Food Fair Stores, Inc. and World-Wide Produce Co., Inc. Subin, Shams & Rosenbluth, Orlando, Fla. for Hallee-Boy Sales, Inc. and Ivin Arost. Collier, Shannon, Rill & Edwards, Wash., D.C. for John P. Storm, a corporation. COMPLAINT IN DOCKET NO. 8786 The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that tl . *For complaint in D. 8789 see 81 F.T.C. 201. By Commission decision dated Aug. 3, 1972, the complaint was dismis as to respondents P & R Brokerage Co. and Frank V. Condello. FOOD FAIR STORES, INC., ET AL. die 1213 Complaint tingent claim for restitution which the Commission is requested to file must be filed by Jan. 24, 1974, if it is to be filed, the time by which respondents’ answer to this request in the application must be filed shall be set at 9:00 a.m., Jan. 22, 1974. Respondents’ answer to the request in the application that the complaint be amended’ shall, in view of the issues raised by the application, be due on Feb. 5, 1974. Therefore, It is ordered, That respondents’ request to strike the application of complaint counsel be, and it hereby is, denied. It is further ordered, That respondents answer by 9:00 a.m., Jan. 22, 1974, complaint counsel’s request that the aforementioned contingent claim be filed, and that respondents answer by Feb. 5, 1974, all other requests made in the application.

← 83 F.T.C. 1211 · 83 F.T.C. 1213 →