Eccles Motor Company
Volume 83 · 83 F.T.C. 1084
Cite this decision
Eccles Motor Company, 83 F.T.C. 1084 (1973). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v083-0093
Report an error in this record (decision id v083-0093)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF ECCLES MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL.
CONSENT ORDER, ETC., INREGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE TRUTH IN LENDING AND FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACTS Docket C-2479. Complaint, Dec. 3, 1973—Decision, Dec. 3, 1973 Consent order requiring a Klamath Falls, Oreg., retailer of new and used motor vehicles, among other things to cease violating the Truth in Lending Act by failing to disclose to consumers, in connection with the extension of consumer credit, such information as required by Regulation Z of the said Act. Appearances For the Commission: Stephen A. Kikuchi and Thornton P. Percival. For the respondents: Richard C. Beesley, Klamath Falls, Oreg. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Truth in Lending Act and the implementing regulation promulgated thereunder, and the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Eccles Motor Company, a corporation and Julian W. Eccles, individually and as an officer of said corporation, hereinafter sometimes referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Acts and implementing regulation, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Eccles Motor Company is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Oregon, with its principal office and place of business located at 606 South Sixth Street, Klamath Falls, Oreg. Respondent Julian W. Eccles is an individual and an officer of the corporate respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the policies, acts and practices of the corporation, including the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. His address is the same as that of the corporate respondent.
PAR. 2. Respondents are now and for some time last past have been
AAV esa ATA EA Ue, Bd FA huvuyv 1084 Decision and Order which the disclosures prescribed by Section 226.8 of Regulation Z are made, as required by Section 226.8(a) of Regulation Z. 14. Failing, in any consumer credit transaction or advertisement, to make all disclosures, determined in accordance with Sections 226.4 and 226.5 of Regulation Z, at the time and in the manner, form and amount required by Sections 226.6, 226.7, 226.8 and 226.10 of Regulation Z.
It is further ordered, That respondents deliver a copy 1 of this order to cease and desist to all present and future personnel of respondents engaged in the consummation of any extension of consumer credit or in any aspect of the preparation, creation or placing of advertising, and that respondent secure from each person a signed statement acknowledging receipt of said order.
It is further ordered, That respondents prominently display no less than two signs on the premises which will clearly and conspicuously state that a customer must receive a complete copy of the consumer credit cost disclosures, as required by the Truth in Lending Act, in any transaction which is financed, before the transaction is consummated. It is further ordered, That the individual respondent named herein notify the Commission of the discontinuance of his present business or employment and of his affiliation with a new business or employment. Such notice shall include respondent’s current business address and a statement as to the nature of the business or employment in which he is engaged, as well as a description of his duties and responsibilities. It is further ordered, That respondents notify the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent, such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation or corporations, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries, or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of the order. It is further ordered, That respondents shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.