Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Bergen Brunswig Corporation

Volume 83 · 83 F.T.C. 687

Citation
83 F.T.C. 687
Docket
C-2463
Complaint
1973-10-04
Decision
1973-10-04
Document type
consent order
Case type
antitrust
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5); Truth in Lending Act
Industry
wholesale distributor of druggists sundries
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; notice_to_customers; compliance_reporting
Order term (years)
5
Commission counsel
John E. Passarelli, Ronald J. Dolan and Daniel R. Kane
Respondent counsel
Douglas Chadwick, Los Angeles, Calif. and Murray J. Laulicht, Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl & Fisher, Newark, N.J
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

price discrimination

Cite this decision

Bergen Brunswig Corporation, 83 F.T.C. 687 (1973). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v083-0062

Report an error in this record (decision id v083-0062)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE MATTER OF BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND TRUTH IN LENDING ACTS Docket C-2463. Complaint, Oct. 4, 1978—Decision, Oct. 4, 1978. Consent order requiring a Los Angeles, California, wholesale distributor of druggists’ sundries, among other things to cease knowingly inducing or receiving discriminatory payments. Respondent is further required to provide each person or organization invited to participate in its trade shows, a copy of this order for a period of five (5) years. Appearances For the Commission: John E. Passarelli, Ronald J. Dolan and Daniel R. Kane.

For the respondent: Douglas Chadwick, Los Angeles, Calif. and Murray J. Laulicht, Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl & Fisher, Newark, N.J.

COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act, having reason to believe that Bergen Brunswig Corporation, a corporation, has violated and is now violating the provisions of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (U.S.C., Title 15, Section 45), and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in respect thereto as follows: 676 Decision and Order during the regular hours of the respondents’ business for inspection and copying.

It is further ordered, That the individual respondents named herein promptly notify the Commission of the discontinuance of their present business or employment and of their affiliation with a new business or employment. Such notice shall include respondents’ current business or employment in which they are engaged as well as a description of their duties and responsibilities. It is further ordered, That the respondents herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order file with the Commission a report, in writing, signed by such respondents, setting forth in detail the manner and form of their compliance with this order.

← 83 F.T.C. 676 · 83 F.T.C. 687 →