Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Market Motors, Inc

Volume 83 · 83 F.T.C. 428

Citation
83 F.T.C. 428
Docket
C-2448
Complaint
1973-09-11
Decision
1973-09-11
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5); Truth in Lending Act
Industry
used car retail
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting; notice_to_customers
Commission counsel
Bernard Rowitz
Respondent counsel
pro se
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

credit lending

Cite this decision

Market Motors, Inc, 83 F.T.C. 428 (1973). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v083-0038

Report an error in this record (decision id v083-0038)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In toe MatTrer or MARKET MOTORS, INC., rrapine as AUTO MARKET, ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND THE TRUTH IN LENDING ACTS Docket C-2448. Complaint, Sept. 11, 1978—Decision, Sept. 11, 1973. Consent order requiring a Washington, D.C., retailer and distributor of used cars, among other things to cease violating the Truth in Lending Act by failing to disclose to consumers, in connection with the extension of consumer credit, such information as required by Regulation Z of the said Act. 428 Complaint Appearances For the Commission: Bernard Rowitz.

For the respondents: pro se.

Complaint Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and of the Truth in Lending Act and the implementing regulation promulgated thereunder, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Market, Motors, Inc., a corporation, trading and doing business as Auto Market, and Abe Mason, individually and as an officer of said corporation, hereinafter sometimes referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Acts, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

Paracrapx 1. Respondent Market Motors, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the District of Columbia, with its principal office and place of business located at 510 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. Said corporate respondent trades and does business as Auto Market. Respondent Abe Mason is an officer of the corporate respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the acts and practices of the corporate respondent including the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. His address is the same as that of the corporate respondent. Par. 2. Respondents are now, and for some time last. past have been engaged in the offering for sale and retail sale and distribution of used cars to the public.

Par. 8. In the ordinary course and conduct of their business as aforesaid, respondents regularly extend consumer credit, as “consumer credit” is defined in Regulation Z, the implementing regulation’ of the Truth in Lending Act, duly promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Par. 4. Subsequent to July 1, 1969, in the ordinary course of busi- . ness as aforesaid, and in connection with their credit sales, as “credit, sales” is defined in Regulation Z, respondents have caused and are causing customers to enter into credit sales contracts and execute binding conditional sales contracts, accompanied by credit sales disclosure statements. On the contracts referred to hereinabove in this paragraph, hereinafter referred to as “the contract,” respondents have Complaint 83 B.T.C.

provided certain limited consumer credit cost information, but have not provided these customers with any other consumer credit cost disclosures.

By and through the use of the contract, respondents : 1. Fail to disclose the annual percentage rate accurately to the nearest quarter of one percent in accordance with Section 226.5(b) of Regulation Z, as required by Section 226.8(b)(2) of Regulation Z. 2. Fail to disclose the annual percentage rate, computed in accordance with Section 226.5 of Regulation Z, as required by Section 226.8 (b) (2) of Regulation Z.

3. Fail to accurately disclose the sum of the cash price, all charges which are included in the amount financed but which are not part of the finance charge, and the finance charge, as required by Section 226.8 (c) (8) (ii) of Regulation Z. .

Par. 5. Pursuant to Section 103(q) of the Truth in Lending Act, respondents’ aforesaid failures to comply with the provisions of Regulation Z constitute violations of that Act and, pursuant to Section 108 thereof, respondents have thereby violated the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Decision AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an’ investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Washington, D.C. Regional Office proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondents with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Truth in Lending Act and the implementing regulation promulgated thereunder; and.

The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission’s rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondents have 428 Decision and Order violated the said Acts, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34(b) of its rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order :

1. Respondent Market Motors, Inc., trading and doing business as Auto Market, is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the District of Columbia, with its principal office and place of business located at 510 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Respondent Abe Mason is an officer of said corporation. He formulates, directs and controls the policies, acts and practices of said corporation, and his principal office and place of business is located at the above stated address.

2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered, That respondents Market Motors, Inc., a corporation, trading and doing business as Auto Market, or under any name or names, its successors and assigns, and its officers, and Abe Mason, individually and as an officer of said corporation, and respondents’ agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with any extension of consumer credit or advertisement to aid, promote or assist directly or indirectly any extension of consumer credit, as “consumer credit” and “advertisement” are defined in Regulation Z (12 C.F.R. § 226) of the Truth in Lending Act (Pub. L. 90-321, 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seg.) , do forthwith cease and desist from : 1. Failing to disclose the annual percentage rate accurately to the nearest quarter of one percent in accordance with Section 226.5(b) of Regulation Z, as required by Section 226.8(b) (2) of Regulation Z.

2. Failing to disclose the annual percentage rate, computed in accordance with Section 226.5 of Regulation Z, as required by Section 226.8 (b) (2) of Regulation Z.

3. Failing to accurately disclose the sum of the cash price, all charges which are included in the amount financed but which are 432 ' FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Decision and Order 83 F.T.C.

not a part of the finance charge; and the finance charge, as required by Section 226.8 (c) (8) (ii) of Regulation Z. 4, Failing, in any consumer credit transaction or advertisement, to make all disclosures determined in accordance with Sections 226.4 and 226.5 of Regulation Z at the time and in the manner, form and amount required by Sections 226.6, 226.8 and 226.10 of Regulation Z.

It is further ordered, That respondents deliver a copy of this order to cease and desist to all present and future personnel of respondents engaged in the consummation of any extension of consumer credit or in any aspect of preparation, creation, or placing of advertising, and that respondents secure a signed statement acknowledging receipt of said order from each such person.

It is further ordered, That the individual respondent named herein promptly notify the Commission of the discontinuance of his present business or employment and of his. affiliation with a new business or employment. Such notice shall include respondent’s current business address and a statement as to the nature of the business or employment in which he is engaged as well as a description of his duties and responsibilities.

It is further ordered, That respondents notify the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent, such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of the order. Tt is further ordered, That the respondents herein shall within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.

← 83 F.T.C. 425 · 83 F.T.C. 432 →