Consumer Law Library

Nat Beinhorn

Volume 80 · 80 F.T.C. 711

Citation
80 F.T.C. 711
Docket
C-2204
Complaint
1972-05-01
Decision
1972-05-01
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5); Fur Products Labeling Act
Industry
retail furrier
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

product labeling

Cite this decision

Nat Beinhorn, 80 F.T.C. 711 (1972). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v080-0097

Report an error in this record (decision id v080-0097)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In rue Matrer or NAT BEINIIORN CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL 'TRADE COMMISSION AND TILE FUR PRODUCTS LABELING ACTS Docket C-2204. Complaint, May 1, 1972—Decision, May 1, 1972 Consent order requiring a New York City retail furrier of fur products to cease misbranding and falsely or deceptively invoicing its products. CoMrLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Fur Products Labeling Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Nat Beinhorn, an individual trading as Nat Beinhorn hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Acts and the rules and regulations promulgated under the Fur Products Labeling Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:

Paracrari 1. Respondent Nat Beinhorn is an individual doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. Respondent is primarily a retail furrier of fur products with his office and principal place of business located at 180 West 30th Strect, New York, New York.

Par. 2. Respondent is now and for some time last past has been engaged in the introduction into commerce, and in the sale, advertis- 487-883—73-——46 707 Complaint It is further ordered, That respondents notify the Commission at least 80 days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of the order.

Lt is further ordered, That the respondent corporation shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to each of its operating divisions. It is further ordered, That respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.

← 80 F.T.C. 709 · 80 F.T.C. 713 →