Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Hairnet Corporation of America

Volume 79 · 79 F.T.C. 184

Citation
79 F.T.C. 184
Docket
C-2001
Complaint
1971-08-04
Decision
1971-08-04
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5); Flammable Fabrics Act
Industry
textile fiber products
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; notice_to_customers; compliance_reporting; other
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

product labeling

Cite this decision

Hairnet Corporation of America, 79 F.T.C. 184 (1971). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v079-0039

Report an error in this record (decision id v079-0039)

Order status: presumptively_terminable_pre_1995. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

In tar Marrer or HAIRNET CORPORATION OF AMERICA rraprne as JACOBI ACCESSORIES CO., ET AL.

CONSENT ORDER, ETC., IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND THE FLAMMABLE FABRICS ACTS Docket C-2001. Complaint, Aug. 4, 1971—Decision, Aug. 4, 1971 Consent order requiring a New York City importer and distributor of textile fiber products, including ladies’ scarves, to cease violating the Flammable Fabrics Act by importing and selling any fabric which fails to conform to the standards of said Act.

Complaint Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Hairnet Corporation of America, a corporation doing business under its own name and under the trade name Jacobi Accessories Co., a division of said corporation, and Edward Gard, individually and as an officer of said corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Acts JACOBI ACCESSORIES CO., ET AL. 185 184 Decision and Order and the rules and regulations promulgated under the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows: Paracrarn 1. Respondent Hairnet Corporation of America, is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 151 West 26th Street, New York, New York. ‘Respondent does business under its own name and under the name Jacobi Accessories Co.

Respondent Edward Gard is an officer of the corporate respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the acts, practices and policies of the said corporate respondent including those hereinafter set forth. Respondents are engaged in the importation, sale and distribution of textile fiber products, including, but not limited to, ladies’ scarves. Par. 2. Respondents are now and for some time last past have been engaged in the sale and offering for sale, in commerce, and the importation into the United States, and have introduced, delivered for introduction, transported and caused to be transported in commerce, and have sold or delivered after sale or shipment in commerce, products, as the terms “commerce,” and “product” are defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, which fail to conform to an applicable standard or regulation continued in effect, issued or amended under the provisions of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended. Among such products mentioned hereinabove were ladies’ scarves. Par. 3. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondents were and are in violation of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and constituted, and now constitute, unfair methods of competition and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce, within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Decision AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Bureau of Consumer Protection proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondents with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended; and 186 FEDERAL: TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Decision and Order 79 ¥F.T.C.

The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission’s rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and haying determined that it had reason to believe that the respondents have violated the said Acts, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in Section 2.34(b) of its rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:

1. Respondent Edward Gard is an officer of the corporate -respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the acts, practices and policies of the said corporate respondent including those hereinafter set forth.

Respondent Hairnet Corporation of America is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. Its office and principal place of business is located at 151 West 26th Street, New York, New York. Respondent ‘does business under its own name and under the name Jacobi Accessories Co.

Respondents are engaged in the importation, sale and distribution of textile fiber products, including, but not limited to, ladies’ scarves. 2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of the proceeding and of the respondents and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is ordered, That the respondents Hairnet Corporation of America, a corporation doing business under its own name and under the trade name Jacobi Accessories Co., a division of said corporation, or under any other name or names and its officers, and Edward Gard, individually and as an officer of said corporation, and respondents’ representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, do forthwith cease and desist from manufacturing for sale, selling, offering for sale, in commerce, or importing into JACOBI ACCESSORIES CO., ET AL. 187 184 Decision and Order the United States, or introducing, delivering for introduction, transporting or causing to’ be transported in commerce, or selling or delivering after sale or shipment in commerce, any product, fabric, or related material; or manufacturing for sale, selling or offering for sale, any product made of fabric or related material which has been shipped or received incommerce as “commerce,” “product,” “fabric” and “related material” are defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, which product, fabric or related material fails to conform to an applicable standard or regulation issued, amended or continued in effect, under the provisions of the aforesaid Act. It is further ordered, That respondents notify all of their customers who have purchased or to whom. have been delivered the ladies’ scarves which gave rise to the complaint, of the flammable nature of said scarves and effect the recall of said scarves from such customers. It is further ordered, That the respondents herein either process the scarves which gave rise to the complaint so as to bring them into conformance with the applicable standard of flammability under the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, or destroy said scarves. It is further ordered, That the respondents herein shall, within ten (10) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission an interim special report in writing setting forth the respondents’ intentions as to compliance with this order. This special report shall also advise the Commission fully and specifically concerning (1) the identity of the scarves which gave rise to the complaint, (2) the number of said scarves in inventory, (8) any action taken and any further actions proposed to be taken to notify customers of the flammability of said scarves and effect the recall of said scarves from customers, and of the results thereof, (4) any. disposition of said scarves since September 10, 1970, and (5) any action taken or proposed to be taken to bring said scarves into conformance with the applicable standard of flammability under the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, or destroy said scarves and the results of such action. Such report shall further inform the Commission as to whether or not respondents have in inventory any product, fabric, or related material having a plain surface and made of paper, silk, rayon and acetate, nylon and acetate, rayon, cotton or any other material or combinations thereof in a weight of two ounces or less per square yard, or any product, fabric, or related material having a raised fiber surface. Respondents shall submit samples of not less than one square yard in size of any such product, fabric, or related material with this report. It is further ordered, That respondents notify the Commission at least 80 days prior to any proposed change in the corporate respondent, Decision and Order 7 E.T.C.

‘such as dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising out of this order.

It is further ordered, That the respondent corporation shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to each of its operating divisions. Tt is further ordered, That the respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.

← 79 F.T.C. 181 · 79 F.T.C. 188 →