Universe Chemicals, Inc
Volume 77 · 77 F.T.C. 1673
Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.
Cite this decision
Universe Chemicals, Inc, 77 F.T.C. 1673 (1970). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v077-0245
Report an error in this record (decision id v077-0245)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS, ETC, 1673 spondent in adequate discovery and the interest of third parties in protection of allegedly confidential information. If the examiner believes that the circumstances of this case are distinguishable from the circumstances in Mississippi River, but that Missouri Portland and Botsford should, nevertheless, receive some form of limited protection, then he should issue an appropriate protective order, one that may be less “restrictive” upon respondent’s access than the Mississippi Liver form of protection. But, as noted above, any departure from Mississippi River treatment should be clearly explained. Accordingly, It is ordered, That the joint appeal of Missouri Portland Cement Company and Botsford Ready Mix Company be, and it hereby is, granted.
It is further ordered, That the hearing examiner’s order denying the motions of Missouri Portland Cement Company and Botsford Ready Mix Company be, and it hereby is, vacated. It is further ordered, That this matter be, and it hereby is, remanded to the hearing examiner for further proceedings and action on the requests herein considered in accordance with the views outlined in this order and opinion.
UNIVERSE CHEMICALS, INC., ET AL.
Docket 8752. Order, Dec. 8, 1370 Order granting leave to individual respondent to proceed in forma pauperis ; granting individual respondent’s request for counsel; referring the matter to the Committee on the Federal Trade Commission of the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association for the designation of counsel to assist individual respondent in prosecuting his appeal; and fixing time within which to perfect the appeal.
Orper Whereas, the Commission, by order issued October 22, 1970 [p. 1651 herein], referred this matter to the hearing examiner for the purpose of making findings of fact on the issue of whether the individual respondent Jordan LL. Lichtenstein possessed sufficient financial resources to retain counsel for the purpose of prosecuting an appea! to the Commission from the Initial Decision entered herein on February 19, 1970;
Whereas, the hearing examiner, in findings filed on November 16, 1970, has found that the individual respondent Jordan L. Lichtenstein lacks sufficient financial resources to retain counsel for the purpose of prosecuting an appeal to the Commission, and the Commission has found no reason to doubt the correctness of that finding;