Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Trade Advertising Associates, Inc

Volume 76 · 76 F.T.C. 1090

Citation
76 F.T.C. 1090
Docket
8582
Decision
1969-12-09
Document type
set aside order
Case type
consumer protection
Industry
publishing
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertising

Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.

Cite this decision

Trade Advertising Associates, Inc, 76 F.T.C. 1090 (1969). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v076-0159

Report an error in this record (decision id v076-0159)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 1 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

any corporation, in commerce, engaged in the business of producing and/or distributing salt in any form, specifically including salt in a dry state produced by any dry mining method, or produced by any evaporation method, and salt in brine; P?' ovided, however That the respondent shall not be prohibited hereby from effectuating the proposed purchase of the assets referred to in the first paragraph of the Commission s order ruling on the pe. tition filed by the respondent on June 7 , 1961; Provided fU1'ther That the respondent shall not be prohibited hereby from effectuating the proposed purchases referred to in the first paragraph of the Commission s order ruling on the petition filed by the respondent on October 1 , 1969. TRADE ADVERTISING ASSOCIATES, INC. , ET AL. Docket 8582. OTder, Dec. , 1969 Order reopening case for evidence whether name of publication " Trade Union Nc\vs " etc., implies affliation with a labor or trade union. ORDER REOPE:-ING PROCEEDI:-G AND DIRECTING HEARI:-GS FOR RECEIPT OF EVIDENCE The Commission having issued on June 19 , 1969, an order requiring respondents to show cause, if any there be, why the Commission should not reopen this proceeding and alter and modify the order to cease and desist entered herein on May 15, 1964 (65 C. 650J; and Respondents having filed, on August 25, 1969 , and October 27 1969, respectively, an answer to the order to show cause and a memorandum in support thereof; and Complaint counsel having filed, on November 14 , 1969, an answering brief supporting the Commission s order to show cause; and The Commission having determined that the foregoing pleadings raise a substantial factual issue requiring the receipt of evidence pursuant to Section 3. 72(b) (3) of the Commission s rules: It is O1'dered That this proceeding be, and it hereby is, reopened and that this matter be assigned to a hearing examiner for the receipt of such testimony and evidence as may be offered in support of and in opposition to the factual issue as to whether the use by respondents of the names or designations "Trade L"union i\Tews " and " Trade Union Kews of ew Jersey" or the use of words or phrases of similar import or meaning (such as trade labor, union, guild, brotherhood, workers) in the titling of their publications (with or without a qualifying statement or statements) in itself constitutes, or may be understood, as an implied

← 76 F.T.C. 1085 · 76 F.T.C. 1091 →