Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Suburban Propane Gas Corporation

Volume 76 · 76 F.T.C. 1059

Citation
76 F.T.C. 1059
Docket
8672
Decision
1969-07-21
Document type
interlocutory order
Case type
antitrust
Industry
propane gas
Outcome
other
Separate statement / dissent
yes
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.

Cite this decision

Suburban Propane Gas Corporation, 76 F.T.C. 1059 (1969). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v076-0146

Report an error in this record (decision id v076-0146)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS, ETC. 1059 It is further ordered That respondent' request for oral presentation be, and it hereby is, denied.

Commissioner Elman not concurring.

SUBURBAN PROPANE GAS CORPORATION Docket 8672. 01'det, July 21;, 1969 Order denying respondent' s request to file appeal from hearing examiner ruling against motion to dismiss.

ORDER DE:-YING LEAVE TO FILE INTERLOCUTORY Appeal This matter is before the Commission upon the request filed by respondent on June 23 , 1969, for leave to file an interlocutory appeal from the hearing examiner s order filed June 12, 1969, denying its motion to dismiss the complaint at the close of the evidence offered in support of the complaint based upon an alleged failure to establish a TJ?'hn, Jacie case; upon complaint counsel' opposition thereto filed June 30, 1969; and upon a reply filed by respondent on July 9, 1969; and The Commission having determined that respondent has made no showing that the hearing examiner abused his discretion in denying its motion to dismiss the complaint and, further, that respondent has made no showing, as required by Section 3.23 of the Commission s Rules of Practice for an interlocutory appeal, that the ruling complained of involves substantial rights and wil materially affect the final decision and that a determination of its correctness before conclusion of the hearing is essential to serve the interests of justice:

It is orrico' That respondent's request, filed .Tune 23 , 1969 , for leave to file an interlocutory appeal from the hearing examiner order denying its motion to dismiss the complaint be, and it hereby is, denied.

Commissioner Elman dissenting.

)/ATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORP.

Ducket 6651. Order, July, 1969 Order requiring parties to file briefs on existence of issues of fact requiring evidentiary hearings and issues of la"\\' raised by previously filed papers.

← 76 F.T.C. 1058 · 76 F.T.C. 1060 →