Consumer Law Library

Norm Thompson Outfitters, Inc

Volume 76 · 76 F.T.C. 310

Citation
76 F.T.C. 310
Docket
C-1578
Complaint
1969-08-07
Decision
1969-08-07
Document type
consent order
Case type
consumer protection
Statutes
FTC Act (section 5); Textile Fiber Products Identification Act; Wool Products Labeling Act
Industry
wearing apparel
Outcome
consent order entered
Relief
cease_and_desist; compliance_reporting
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

product labelingdeceptive advertising

Cite this decision

Norm Thompson Outfitters, Inc, 76 F.T.C. 310 (1969). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v076-0038

Report an error in this record (decision id v076-0038)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

I)' THE MATTER OF NORM THOMPSON OUTFITTERS, INC., ET AL.

CO)'SENT ORDER, ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION , THE WOOL PRODUCTS LABELING, AND THE TEXTILE FIBER PRODUC1'S IDENTIFICATION ACTS Docket C-1578. Contplaint, Aug. 7, 19G9-Decision, Aug. 7, 1969 Consent order requiring a Portland, Oregon, importer and mail order seller of wearing apparel to cease misbranding its wool and textile fiber prod ucts and falsely advertising its textile fiber products. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 and the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Norm Thompson Outfitters, Inc., a corporation, and Bernard A. Alport, individually and as an offcer of said corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of the said Acts and the Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Norm Thompson Outfitters, Inc. , is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Oregon, with its offce and principal place of business located at 1805 NW. Thurman Street Portland, Oregon.

Individual respondent, Bernard A. Alport is an offcer of the corporate respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the policies, acts and practices of said corporation, including the acts and practices hereinafter referred to. His address is the same as that of the corporate respondent.

Respondents are importers of woolen and textile fiber outerwear and are also engaged in the mail sale of such products.order PAR. 2. Respondents now and for some time last past have introduced into commerce, sold, transported, distributed, delivered NORM THOMPSON OUTFITTERS, INC. , ET AL. 311 310 Complaint for shipment, shipped and offered for sale in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939, wool products, as "wool product" is defined therein. PAR. 3. Certain of said wool products were misbranded by respondents within the intent and meaning of Section 4(a) (1) of the Wool Products Labeling Act and the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder in that they were falsely and deceptively stamped, tagged, labeled or otherwise identified with respect to the character and amount of the constituent fibers contained therein.

Among such misbranded wool products, but not limited thereto were certain wool products, namely coats with linings which linings were labeled "100% wool" whereas in truth and in fact said wool products contained substantially different fibers and amounts of fibers than as represented.

PAR. 4. Certain of said wool products were further misbranded by respondents in that they were not stamped, tagged, labeled or otherwise identified as required under the provisions of Section 4(a) (2) of the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 and in the manner and form as prescribed by the Rules and Regulations promulgated under said Act.

Among such misbranded wool products, but not limited thereto, was a wool product with a label on or affxed thereto which failed to disclose the percentage of the total fiber weight of the said wool product, exclusive of ornamentation not exceeding 5 per centum of the total fiber weight, of (1) wool; (2) reprocessed wool; (3) reused wool; (4) each fiber other than wool, when said percentage by weight of such fiber was 5 per centum or more; and (5) the aggregate of al1 other fibers. PAR. 5. The acts and practices of the respondents as set forth above were and are in violation of the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 and the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, and constituted, and now constitute, unfair methods of competition and unfair and deceptive acts or practices, in commerce within the intent and meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

PAR. 6. Respondents are now, and for some time last past have been engaged in the introduction, delivery for introduction, sale advertising, and offering for sale, in commerce, and in the transportation or causing to be transported in commerce, and in the importation into the United States, of textile fiber products; and 312 FEDERAL TRADE COMYIISSION DECISIONS Complaint 76 F. T.

have sold, offered for sale, advertised, delivered, transported and caused to be transported, textile fiber products, which have been advertised or offered for sale in commerce; and have sold, offered for sale, advertised, delivered, transported and caused to be transported, after shipment in commerce, textile fiber products, either in their original state or contained in other textile fiber products; as the terms Hcommerce" and "textile fiber product" are defined in the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act. PAR. 7. Certain of said textile fiber products were falsely and deceptively advertised in that respondents in making disclosures or implications as to the fiber content of such textile fiber products in written advertisements used to aid, promote, and assist, directly or indirectly in the sale or offering for sale of said products, failed to set forth the required information as to fiber content as specified by Section 4 (c) of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act and in the manner and form prescribed by the Rules and Regulations promulgated under said Act. Among such textile fiber products, but not jimited thereto, were articles of wearing apparel which were falsely and deceptively advertised by means of a "catalogue" distributed by respondents throughout the United States in that the true generic names of the fibers contained in such textie fiber products were not set forth in said catalogue.

PAR. 8. By means of the aforesaid advertisements and others of similar import and meaning not specifically referred to herein respondents falsely and deceptively advertised textile fiber products in violation of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act in that the said textile fiber products were not advertised in accordance with the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder in the following respects:

A. Fiber trademarks were used in advertising textile fiber products without full disclosure of the fiber content information required by the said Act and the Rules and Regulations thereunder in at least one instance in said advertisement, in violation of Rule 41 (a) of the aforesaid Rules and Regulations. B. Fiber trademarks were used in advertising textile fiber products containing more than one fiber and such fiber trademarks did not appear in the required fiber content information in immediate proximity and conjunction with the generic names of the fibers in plainly legible type or lettering of equal size or conspicuousness in violation of Rule 41 (b) of the aforesaid Rules and Regulations.

NORM THOMPSON OUTFITTERS, INC. , ET AL. 313 310 Complaint C. Fiber trademarks were used in advertising textile fiber products containing only one fiber, and such fiber trademark did not appear, at least once in immediate proximity and conjunction with the generic name of the fiber, in plainly legible and conspicuous type, in violation of Rule 41 (c) of the aforesaid Rules and Regulations.

PAR. 9. The acts and practices of the respondents as set forth in Paragraphs Seven and Eight were, and are, in violation of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act and the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder and constituted, and now constitute unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices, in commerce, under the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Decislon AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Bureau of Textiles and Furs proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondents with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 and the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act; and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of al1 the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission s Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondents have violated the said Acts, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in 9 2.34 (b) of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional fmdings, and enters the following order: Decision and Order 76 F. T. 1. Respondent K orm Thompson Outfitters, Inc. , is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Oregon, with its offce and principal place of business located at I805 KW. Thurman Street, Portland Oregon.

Respondent Bernard A. Alport is an offcer of said corporation and his address is the same as that of said corporation. 2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is Q1.dered That respondents K arm Thompson Outfitters, Inc. , a corporation, and its offcers, and Bernard A. Alport, individually and as an offcer of said corporation, and respondents representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the introduction into commerce, or the offering for sale, sale, transportation, delivery for shipment or shipment, in commerce, of wool products as commerce" and "wool product" are defined in the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 , do forthwith cease and desist from misbranding such products by:

1. Falsely or deceptively stamping, tagging, labeling or otherwise identifying such products as to the character or amount of the constituent fibers contained therein. 2. Failing to securely affx to, or place on, each such product a stamp, tag, label or other means of identification correctly showing in a clear and conspicous manner each element of information required to be disclosed by Section 4 (a) (2) of the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939. It is fur.the?' Q1.dered That respondents K orm Thompson Outfitters, Inc. , a corporation, and its offcers, and Bernard A. Alport, individually and as an offcer of said corporation, and respondents' representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the introduction, delivery for introduction, sale, advertising, or offering for sale, in commerce, or the transportation or causing to be transported in commerce, or the importation into the 1.united States, of any textile fiber product; or in connection with the sale offering for sale, advertising, delivery, transportation, or causing to be transported, of any textile fiber product which has been ad- NORM THOYIPSON OUTFITTERS, INC. , ET AL. 315 310 Dccision and Order vertised or offered for sale in commerce; or in connection with the sale, offering for sale, advertising, delivery, transportation, or causing to be transported, after shipment in commerce, of any textile fiber product, whether in its original state or contained in other textile fiber products, as the terms "commerce" and "textile fiber product" are defined in the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, do forthwith cease and desist from falsely and deceptively advertising textile fiber products by: 1. Making any representations, directly or by implication as to fiber content of any textile fiber product in any written advertisement which is used to aid, promote, or assist, directly or indirectly, in the sale or offering for sale of such textile fiber product, unless the same information required to be shown on the stamp, tag, label, or other means of identification under Section 4 (b) (1) and (2) of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act is contained in the said advertisement, except that the percentages of the fibers present in the textile fiber product need not be stated. 2. Using a fiber trademark in an advertisement without a full disclosure of the required content information in at least one instance in the said advertisement.

3. Using a fiber trademark in advertising textile fiber products containing more than one fiber without such fiber trademark appearing in the required fiber content information in immediate proximity and conjunction with the generic name of the fiber in plainly legible type or lettering of equal size and conspicuousness.

4. Using a fiber trademark in advertising textile fiber products, containing only one fiber without such fiber trademark appearing in the required fiber content information in immediate proximity and conjunction with the generic name of the fiber in plainly legible type or lettering of equal size and conspicuousness.

It is further O1'dered That the respondent corporation shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to each of its operating divisions.

It is furthe1. ordered That the respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order. Complaint 76 F.

← 76 F.T.C. 304 · 76 F.T.C. 316 →