Stanley Works
Volume 75 · 75 F.T.C. 1086
Extraction note: this decision's boundaries or caption were hard to read automatically; check the source volume.
Cite this decision
Stanley Works, 75 F.T.C. 1086 (1969). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v075-0114
Report an error in this record (decision id v075-0114)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
by. respondent on March 21, 1969, to strike the brief filed by U.S. Pipe in opposition to respondent’s application because of its length. The Commission’s Rules are silent as to this point, although by inference respondent would supply the omission and limit the brief in opposition to the same length as the application. Further, the length of typewritten documents is a. relative matter and the Commission has taken note of the obvious fact that while respondent employed single spacing with narrow margins, U.S. Pipe used double spacing with correspondingly wide margins so that its brief is of little, if any, greater total length than that submitted by respondent. Thus the Commission can only wonder why such a point was ever raised at all. Commissioner MacIntyre concurring in the result. ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL EXAMINER’S DENIAL OF MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS - Upon consideration. of respondent’s Application For Leave To Appeal From Hearing Examiner’s Order Which Denies Respondent’s Motion To Compel Answers, filed March 7, 1969, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, It is ordered, That the Application For Leave To Appeal be, and it hereby is, denied.
‘Commissioner MacIntyre concurring in the result. THE STANLEY WORKS Docket 8760. Order, May 6, 1969 Order granting hearing examiner’s request for withdrawal of his certification for enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum. ORDER RULING ON THE EXAMINER’S REQUEST ORDERING THE WITHDRAWAL OF A CERTIFICATE FOR ENFORCEMENT OF SUBPOENA This matter is before the Commission upon the hearing examiner’s request, filed April 22, 1969, that the certification with recommendation for enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum directed to Mr. Bernard Friedel, President, David Allison Co., Inc., at the instance of the respondent, be ordered withdrawn. This request is occasioned by the fact that respondent, on April 17, 1969, filed a motion to cease any enforcement proceeding aimed at compliance with the subpoena for the reason that a stipulation with complaint counsel regarding some of the mate-