Federal Construction Company, Inc
Volume 75 · 75 F.T.C. 325
deceptive advertisingbait and switchpricing comparisonswarranty
Cite this decision
Federal Construction Company, Inc, 75 F.T.C. 325 (1969). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v075-0032
Report an error in this record (decision id v075-0032)
Cited by 0 later FTC decisions
Cites
Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)
IN THE MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. CONSENT ORDER, ETC. , IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket C-1493. Complaint, Feb. 20, 1969-Decision, Feb. 20, 1969 Consent order requiring a Tulsa, Okla., home improvement company to cease using bait advertising, false pricing and savings claims, deceptive guarantees, falsely alleging connedion with manufacturers, failing to disclose aU terms of its sales contracts, and other deceptive sales practices.
COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that .Federal Construction Company, Inc. , a corporation, and H. Harold Becko, individually and as an offcer of said corporation hereinafter referred to as respondents, have violated the provisions of said Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:
PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Federal Construction Company, Inc. is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Oklahoma, with its principal offce and place of business located at 8178 East 44th Street in the city of Tulsa, State of Oklahoma. Respondent H. Harold Becko is an individual and an offcer of the corporate respondent. He formulates, directs and controls the acts and practices of the corporate respondent, including . . 326 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION m;CISIONS Complaint 75 F.
the acts and practices hereinafter set forth. His address is the same as that of the corporate respondent. Respondents are now trading, and for some time last past have traded, as:
Federal Construction Company, Lifetime Construction Company, General Construction Company, Kaiser Distributors of Tulsa, Aluminum Products, Sterling Homes, Exterior Design Specialists, Globe Aluminum, Plastic Distributors, Alsco, Federal Coatings.
PAR. 2. Respondents are now, and for some time last past have been, engaged in the advertising, offering for sale, sale distribution and installation of residential siding materials to the public.
PAR. 3. In the course and conduct of their business as aforesaid, respondents now cause, and for some time last past have caused, their said products, when sold, to be shipped from their place of business in the State of Oklahoma to purchasers thereof located in various other States of the United States, and maintain, and at all times mentioned herein have maintained a substantial course of trade in said products in commerce, as commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act. PAR. 4. In the course and conduct of their aforesaid business and for the purpose of inducing the purchase of their products respondents have made, and are now making, numerous statements and representations in advertising circulars and other promotional material and in oral statements made by their salesmen and representatives with respect to the nature of their offer their prices, time limitations, guarantees and performance of their products.
Typical and ilustrative of said statements and representations, but not all inclusive thereof, are the following: Save summer special our regular $499 now only 5299 offer good next three days only We warrant in writing for twenty years. Save up to 30% on air-conditioning and heating bills. PAR. 5. By and through the use of the aforesaid statements and representations, and others of similar import and meaning, but not expressly set out herein, separately and in connection with the oral statements and representations of their salesmen and representatives, the respondents have represented, and are now representing, directly or by implication, that: 325 Complaint 1. The offer set forth in said advertisement was a bona fide offer to sell said residential siding material of the kind therein described at the price and on the terms and conditions stated. 2. The offer set forth in said advertisement was for a limited time only.
3. Respondents' siding materials are being offered for sale at special or reduced prices, and that savings are thereby afforded to purchasers from respondents' regular sellng prices. 4. All purchasers of respondents' siding material wil realize a 30 percent savings in their air-conditioning and heating bils. 5. Siding materials sold by respondents wil never require painting or repairing.
G. Respondents' Riding materials and installations are unconditionally guaranteed in every respect without condition or limitation for a period of twenty years or more. 7. Homes of prospective purchasers have been specially selected as model homes for the installation of respondents' products; after installation such homes would be used for demonstration and advertising purposes by respondents; and, that as a result of allowing their homes to be used as models, purchasers would receive allowances, discounts or commissions. 8. Purchasers of respondents' siding installations wil receive enough commissions from referrals of other prospective purchasers to obtain their installation at little or no cost. 9. Respondents or their salesmen are connected or affliated with the Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation or U. Steel Corporation.
10. Monthly payments as set forth in the contracts between respondents and their prospective customers include interest and insurance charges.
PAR. 6. In truth and in fact:
1. The offer set forth above was not a genuine or bona fide offer but was made for the purpose of obtaining leads as to persons interested in the purchase of respondents' products. After obtaining such leads, respondents, their salesmen or representatives would call upon such persons at their homes or wait upon them at respondents' place of business. At such times and places, respondents, their salesmen or representatives would disparage the advertised siding and otherwise discourage the purchase thereof and would attempt to sell, and did sell, different and more expensive residential siding materials. 2. The offer set forth above was not for a limited time only. Complaint 75 F.
Said merchandise was advertised regularly at the represented prices and on the terms and conditions therein stated. 3. Respondents' siding materials are not being offered for sale at special or reduced prices, and savings are not thereby afforded respondents' customers because of a reduction from respondents' regular selling prices. In fact, respondents do not have a regular sellng price but the price at which respondents' products are sold varies from customer to customer depending on the resistance of the prospective purchaser. 4. All purchasers of respondents' residential siding materials will not realize a 30 percent savings in their air-conditioning and heating bils. Few, if any, wil achieve such savings. 5. Residential siding materials sold by respondents wil require painting and repairing.
6. Respondents' residential siding materials and installations are not unconditionally guaranteed in every respect without conditions or limitations for a period of twenty years. Such guarantee as may be provided is subject to numerous terms conditions and limitations, and fails to set forth the nature and extent of the guarantee, the identity of the guarantor and the manner in which the guarantor wil perform thereunder. 7. Homes of prospective purchasers are not specially selected as model homes for the installation of respondents' products; after installations such homes are not used for demonstration or advertising purposes by respondents; and purchasers, as a result of allowing their homes to be used as models, are not granted reduced prices nor do they receive allowances, discounts or commissions.
8. Few, if any, purchasers of respondents' residential siding installation received enough referral commissions to obtain their installation at little or no cost and respondents seldom, if ever pay allowances or commissions in referral sales. 9. Respondents are not connected or affliated with Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation or U.S. Steel Corporation. 10. The monthly payments set forth in the contracts between respondents and their prospective customers do not includc all the interest and insurance charges. In fact, the finance companies later charge additional insurance and interest charges which were not previously included in the monthly payments; and by virtue of said false, misleading and deceptive representations with respect to terms and condition of sale, respondents thereby secure thc execution of partially completed contracts of sale or 325 Decision and Order other instruments which are later completed to include charges and obligations not agreed to by the purchaser. Therefore, the statements and representations as set forth in Paragraphs Four and Five hereof were and are false, misleading and deceptive.
PAR. 7. In the course and conduct of their aforesaid business and at aU times mentioned herein, respondents have been and now are in substantial competition, in commerce, with corporations, firms and individuals in the sale of residential siding materials and other products of the same general kind and nature as that sold by respondents.
PAR. 8. The use by the respondents of the aforesaid false, misleading and deceptive statements, representations and practices has had, and now has, the capacity and tendency to mislead members of the purchasing public into the erroneous and mistaken belief that said statements and representations were and are true and into the purchase of substantial quantities of respondents' products by reason of said erroneous and mistaken belief.
PAR. 9. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondents, as herein aUeged, were and are all to the prejudice and injury of the public and of respondents' competitors and constituted, and now constitute, unfair methods of competition in commerce and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce, in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondents named in the caption hereof, and the respondents having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Bureau of Deceptive Practices proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission would charge respondents with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and The respondents and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondents of aU the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondents that the law 330 EDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Decision and Order 75 J.' has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission s Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondents have violated the said Act, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days, now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in S 2.34(b) of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:
1. Respondent Federal Construction Company, Inc. , is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Oklahoma, with its offce and principal place of business located at 8178 East 44th Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Respondent H. Harold Becko is an individual and an offcer of said corporation and his address is the same as that of said corporation.
2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondents, and the proceeding is in the public interest.
ORDER It is ordered That respondents Federal Construction Company, Inc., a corporation, and its offcers, and H. Harold Becko, individually and as an officer of said corporation, trading under said corporate name or under any trade name or names, and respondents' agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the advertising, offering for sale, sale, distribution or installation of residential siding materials or other home improvement products or services or other products, in commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:
1. Using, in any manner, a sales plan, scheme or device wherein false, misleading or deceptive statements or representations are made in order to obtain leads or prospects for the sale of any merchandise or services. 2. Making representations purporting to offer merchandise for sale when the purpose of the representation is not 325 Decision and Order to sell the olTered merchandise but to obtain leads or prospects for the sale of other merchandise at higher prices. 3. Discouraging the purchase of or disparaging any merchandise or services which are advertised or offered for sale either before or after a contract has been signed for the purchase of such merchandise or services. 4. Representing, directly or by implication, that any merchandise or services are offered for sale when such offer is not a bona fide offer to sell such merchandise or services. 5. Representing, directly or by implication, that respondents' offer of products is limited as to time, or is limited in any other manner: Provided, however That it shall be a defense in any enforcement proceeding instituted hereunder for respondents to establish that any represented limitation as to time or other represented restrictions is actually imposed and in good faith adhered to by respondents. 6. Representing, directly or by implication, that any price for respondents' products is a special or reduced price, unless such price constitutes a significant reduction from an established seIJng price at which such products have been sold in substantial quantities by respondents in the recent regular course of their business; or misrepresenting, in any manner, that any savings or a stated amount of savings are available to purchasers.
7. Representing, directly or by implication, that purchasers of respondents' residential siding materials win realize a 30 percent savings or any other percentage or amount of savings in their air-conditioning or heating billR: PTOvided, however That it shall be a defense in any enforcement proceeding instituted hereundcr for respondents realized the to establish that each such purchaser in fact represented savings.
8. Representing, directly or by implication, that rcsidential siding materials sold by respondents wil never require painting or repairing; or misrepresenting, in any manner, the durability, performance or quality of respondents' products.
9. Representing, directly or by implication, that any of respondents' products or installations are guaranteed unless the nature, extent and duration of the guarantee, the identity of the guarantor and the manner in which the guarantor wil perform thereunder are clearly and conspicuously disclosed. Decision and Order 75 F.
10. Representing, directly or by implication, that the home of any of respondents' customers or prospective customers has been specially selected as a model home to be used or wil be used as a model home, or otherwise, for advertising, demonstration or sales purposes. 11. Representing, directly or by implication, that any allowance, discount or commission is granted by respondents to purchasers in return for permitting the premises on which respondents' products are installed to be used for model homes or demonstration purposes.
12. Representing, directly or by implication, that purchasers are able to obtain respondents' products at little or no cost as a result of the receipt of commissions or compensation from referrals.
13. Falsely representing that purchasers will receive referral commissions or misrepresenting in any manner the amount of referral commissions that purchasers will receive. 14. Representing, directly or by implication, that respondents are connected or affliated with Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation or U. S. Steel Corporation, or misrepresenting, in any manner, the identity of the manufacturer or the source of any of respondents' products or the respondents' business connections or affliations. 15. Inducing or causing purchasers or prospective purchasers of respondents' merchandise to sign blank or partially completed sale contracts, or any other instruments. 16. Failing or refusing to disclose the exact amount of the total purchase price of merchandise, including all interests, credit or service charges, at the time the contract for the sale of such merchandise is executed by the purchaser or purchasers.
17. Failng to deliver a copy of this order to cease and desist to all present and future salesmen or other persons engaged in the sale of respondents' products or services and failing to secure from each such salesman or other person a signed statement acknowledging receipt of said order.
It is further ordered That the respondent corporation shall forthwith distribute a copy of this order to each of its operating divisions.
It is further ordered That the respondents herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, fie with 325 Complaint the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this order.