Henry Haber

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

IN THE l\A TTER OF HENRY HABER TRADING AS HENRY HABER FURS CONSENT ORDER, ETC. , IX REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLA TION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND THE FUR PRODUCTS LABELING ACTS Docket C-1308. Complaint, July 1968-Decis' ion, July, 1968 Consent order requiring a New York City manufacturing furrier to cease deceptively invoicing his fur products and furnishing false guaranties. COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Fur Products Labeling Act, and by virtue of the authority vested in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission having reason to believe that Henry Haber, an jndividual trading as Henry Haber Furs, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Acts and the Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Fur Products Labeling Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public intercst, hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows: PARAGRAPH 1. Respondent Henry Haber is an individual trading as Henry Haber Furs. Respondent is a manufacturer of fur products with his offce and principal place of business located at 134 West 29th Street, New York, J\ew York. PAR. 2. Respondent is now and for some time last past has been engaged in the introduction into commerce, and in the manufacture for introduction .into commerce, and in the sale advertising, and offering for sale in commerce, and in the transportation and distribution in commerce, of fur products; and has Decision and Order 74 F. manufactured for sale, sold, advertised, offered for sale, transported and distributed fur produds which have been made in whole or in part of furs which have been shipped and received in commerce, as the terms "commerce fur" and "fuy product" are defined "in the Fur Products Labeling Act. PAR. 3. Certain of said fur products were falsely and deceptively invoiced by the respondent in that they were not invoiced as required by Section 5 (b) (1) of the Fur Products Labeling Act and the Rules and Regulations promulgated under such Act. Among such falsely and deceptively invoiced fur products, but not limited thereto, were fur products covered by invoices which failed to disclose that the fur contained in the fur products was bleached, dyed, or otherwise artificially colored, when such was the fact.

PAR. 4. Certain of said fur products were fabely and deceptively invoiced in that said fur products were invoiced to show that the fur contained therein was natural, when in fact such fur was pointed, bleached, dyed, tip-dyed or otherwise artificially colored, in violation of Section 5 (b) (2) of the Fur Products Labeling Act.

PAR. 5. Respondent furnished false guaranties that certain of his fur products were not misbranded, falsely invoiced or falsely advertised when respondent in furnishing such guaranties had reason to believe that fur products so falsely guarantied would be introduced, sold, transported or distributed in commerce, in violation of Section 10 (b) of the Fur Products Labeling Act. PAR. 6. The aforesaid acts and practices of respondent, as herein alleged, are in violation of the Fur Products Labeling Act and the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder and constitute unfair methods of competition and unfair and deceptive acts and practices in commerce under the Federal Trade Commission Act.

DECISION AND ORDER The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of the respondent named in the caption hereof, and the respondent having been furnished thereafter with a copy of a draft of complaint which the Bureau of Textiles and Furs proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued by the Commission, would charge respondent with violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Fur Products Labeling Act; and HENRY HABER FURS, ET AL. 131 129 Order The respondent and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission s Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that the respondent has violated the said Acts, and that complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon accepted the executed consent agreement and placed such agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days now in further conformity with the procedure prescribed in 9 2.34 (b) of its Rules, the Commission hereby issues its complaint, makes the following jurisdictional findings, and enters the following order:

1. Respondent Henry Haber is an individual trading as Henry Haber Furs, with his offce and principal place of business located at 134 West 29th Street, New York, New York. 2. The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this proceeding and of the respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest.

ORDER It is o1'dered That respondent Henry Haber, an individual trading as Henry Haber Furs or any other name, and respondent' representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection ,with the introduction or manufacture for introduction, into commerce, or the sale advertising or offering for sale in commerce, or the transportation or distribution in commerce, of any fur product; or in connection with the manufacture for sale, sale, advertising, offering for sale, transportation or distribution of any fur product which is made in whole or in part of fur which has been shipped and received in commerce, as the terms " commerce fur" and "fur product" are defined in the Fur Products Labeling Act, do forthwith cease and desist from falsely or deceptively invoicing any fur product by:

1. Failing to furnish an invoice, as the term "invoice " is defined in the Fur Products Labeling Act, showing in words and figures plainly legible all the information required to Complaint 74 F.

be disclosed by each of the subsections of Section 5 (b) (1) of the Fur Products Labeling Act.

2. Representing, directly or by implication, on an invoice that the fur contained in such fur product is natural when such fur is pointed, bleached, dyed, tip-dyed, or otherwise artificially colored.

It is f1l.thel' onlend That respondent Henry Haber, an individual trading as Henry Haber Furs or any other name, and respondent' s representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other dC'lice, do forthwith cease and desist from furnishing a false guaranty that any fur product is not misbranded, falsely invoiced or falsely advertised when the respondent has reason to believe that such fur product may be introduced, sold, transported, or distributed in commerce. It is fU1'thel' onlej' That the respondent herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon him of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which he has complied with this order.