Consumer Law LibrarySearchBy decadeBy respondentBy topicBy outcomeDataAbout

Consolidated Mortgage Company et al.

Volume 73 · 73 F.T.C. 711

Citation
73 F.T.C. 711
Docket
8723
Decision
not printed in the source
Document type
set aside order
Case type
consumer protection
Industry
mortgage loan
Outcome
set aside
Relief
cease_and_desist
Source
Original volume PDF
Original PDF
This decision as a PDF

deceptive advertisingcredit lending

Cite this decision

Consolidated Mortgage Company et al., 73 F.T.C. 711 (1968). Consumer Law Library, https://consumerlawlibrary.org/decisions/v073-0041

Report an error in this record (decision id v073-0041)

Order status: unknown. Sunset may be extended by the latest qualifying federal-court complaint alleging an order violation; complaints, dismissal/appeal outcomes, and respondent-specific extensions are not fully tracked.

Cited by 0 later FTC decisions

Cites

Text (OCR of the scan at left; may contain errors)

in the policy.

It is further ordered, That the respondent herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order.

IN THE MATTER OF

CONSOLIDATED MORTGAGE COMPANY ET AL.

ORDER DISMISSING AN ORDER IN REGARD TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT

Docket 8723. Complaint, Dec. 8, 1966—Decision, Apr. 19, 1968

Order reopening an order dated February 19, 1968, page 376 herein, against a now dissolved Providence, R.I., mortgage loan company and its officers, and dismissing the complaint and setting aside the order as to the corporate respondent.

ORDER REOPENING AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND SETTING ASIDE ORDER AS TO CORPORATE RESPONDENT

Respondents, on March 18, 1968, filed with the Commission a petition, requesting the Commission to reconsider its opinion and final order issued February 19, 1968, on the grounds that the Commission

CONSOLIDATED MORTGAGE CO. ET AL. 711

699 Order

representation and the insurer does in fact indemnify for residence in such a hospital.

10. Representing to insured individuals who file claims that the policy under which they claim does not cover injuries if the accident from which the injuries resulted was caused by the insured's negligence or intoxication unless the policy is in fact so limited and such limitations are clearly and conspicuously disclosed in the advertising material for the policy. 11. Representing that any policy provides for indemnification against disability or loss due to sickness, disease, accident or death, in any amount or for any period of time, unless a statement of all the conditions, exceptions, restrictions, limitations, costs and possible additional assessments affecting the indemnification actually provided is set forth conspicuously, prominently and in sufficiently close conjunction with the representation or representations as will fully relieve it of all capacity to deceive. 12. Omitting any material limitations in the coverage of any policy in any advertising which purports to describe the coverage in the policy.

It is further ordered, That the respondent herein shall, within sixty (60) days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order.

IN THE MATTER OF

← 73 F.T.C. 696 · 73 F.T.C. 711 →